Abstract
The electrochemical characteristics of the Cu (II)/Cu (I) and the Cu (I)/Cu (0) couples at platinum, carbon, mercury and copper have been studied in acetonitrile-water (AN-H2O) mixtures. All the electrode processes are moderately fast with mercury the fastest but slower on platinum and carbon paste in that order. A slow chemical step precedes oxidation of Cu (I) to Cu (II) on allectrodes in solutions of high AN content. The slow step may be partial removal of AN from the solvated Cu (I) ion prior to electron transfer. Electrode processes are faster in chloride ions than in sulfate ion solutions. Reduction of Cu (I) in AN−H2O is quite slow on glassy carbon. Adsorption of AN on platinum and carbon influences the processes. Diffusion coefficients in sulfate solutions are in the order, Cu (I) (AN−H2O)>Cu (II)(AN−H2O)>Fe (III)(H2O) and 2-hydroxy-cyanoethane (2-HCE) strongly decreases the mobility of Cu (I) when added to H2O. The relevance of the measurements to hydrometallurgical processes is considered. CuSO4 in 30% v/v AN−H2O is a ‘faster’ oxidant than the common oxidant Fe2(SO4)3 in H2O because of the greater mobility and faster electron acceptance from a corroding surface of Cu (II). Only in solutions of very high nitrile content is the reduction potential of CuSO4 as high as that of Fe2(SO4)3 in H2O.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. J. Parker, W. E. Waghorne, D. E. Giles, J. H. Sharp, R. Alexander, and D. M. Muir, U. S. Pat. 3,865, 744 (Feb. 1975), Br. Pat. 1381666 (1975).
A. J. Parker,Search 4, 426 (1973) and A. J. Parker and D. M. Muir,Hydrometallurgy 6, 239 (1981).
A. J. Parker and D. M. Muir,Min. Mag., 537 (1976).
D. M. Muir, A. J. Parker, J. H. Sharp, and W. E. Waghorne,Hydrometallurgy 1, 61 (1975).
D. M. Muir, A. J. Parker, J. H. Sharp, and W. E. Waghorne,Hydrometallurgy 1, 155 (1975).
I. D. MacLeod, D. M. Muir, A. J. Parker, and P. Singh,Aust. J. Chem. 30, 1423 (1977).
A. J. Parker, D. A. Clarke, R. A. Couche, G. W. Miller, R. I. Tilley, and W. E. Waghorne,Aust. J. Chem. 30, 1661 (1977).
A. J. Parker, D. M. Muir, D. E. Giles, R. Alexander, E. O'Kane, and J. Avraamides,Hydrometallurgy 1, 169 (1975).
D. M. Muir, A. J. Parker, D. E. Giles,Hydrometallurgy 2, 127 (1976).
J. Pang, I. M. Ritchie, and D. E. Giles,Electrochimica Acta 20, 923 (1975).
A. J. Parker, R. L. Paul, and G. P. Power,Aust. J. Chem. 34, 13 (1981).
J. L. Anderson, and I. Shain,Anal. Chem. 48, 1274 (1976).
J. O'M. Bockris and M. Eyno,Trans. Farad. Soc. 58, 1187 (1962).
D. S. Polcyn and I. Shain,Anal. Chem. 38, 370 (1966).
D. G. Peters and S. A. Cruser,J. Electroanal. Chem. 9, 27 (1965).
R. S. Nicholson and I. Shain,Anal. Chem. 36, 706 (1964).
R. N. Adams,Electrochemistry at Solid Electrodes (Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1969).
D. B. Hibbert, H. Sugiarto, and A. C. C. Tseung,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans I 8, 1973 (1978).
M. Eigen,Pure and Applied Chem. 6, 105 (1963).
H. A. Kozlowska, B. MacDougall, and B. E. Conway,J. Electroanal. Chem. 39, 287 (1972).
F. H. Beyerlein and R. S. Nicholson,Anal. Chem. 44, 1647 (1972).
G. Kortüm,Treatise on Electrochemistry (Elsevier. London, 1965).
N. White and F. Lawson,J. Electroanal. Chem. 26, 113 (1970).
T. Berzins and P. Delahay,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75, 555 (1953).
S. E. Manahan and R. T. Iwamoto,J.Electroanal. Chem. 14, 213 (1967).
R. S. Nicholson,Anal. Chem. 37, 1351 (1965).
G. Mamantov, D. L. Manning, and J. M. Dale,J. Electroanal. Chem. 9, 253 (1965).
J. A. Harrison and H. R. Thirsk, inElectroanalytical Chemistry, A. J. Bard, ed., Vol. 5. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1975).
N. White and F. Lawson,J. Electroanal. Chem. 25, 409 (1970).
R. G. Bates, inSolute-solvent Interactions, J. F. Coetzee and C. D. Ritchie, eds., (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1969).
J. A. Lanning and J. Q. Chambers,Anal. Chem. 45, 1010 (1973).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Macleod, I.D., Parker, A.J. & Singh, P. Electrochemistry of copper in aqueous acetonitrile. J Solution Chem 10, 757–774 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00649487
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00649487