Skip to main content
Log in

Relative body fat and anthropometric prediction of body density of male athletes

  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two hundred and seven male members of South Australian representative squads in 18 sports (¯X±s = 24.2±4.7 years) were tested in order to provide descriptive data on relative body fat (% BF), develop a population specific equation and cross-validate existing equations.

Measurements were taken of 10 circumferences, 2 diameters and 8 skinfolds; body density (BD) was measured by underwater weighing with the residual volume (RV) being determined by He dilution. The overall mean BD was 1.0761 g · cm−3 (s=0.0085 g·cm−3; range = 1.0465–1.0968 g·cm−3) which corresponded to 10.0% BF according to Siri (s=3.7%; range=1.3–23.0%). The games players (n=129) registered an overall mean of 10.3% BF (s=3.7%; range=2.2–23.0%). There were significant differences (p<0.05) for % BF between the lacrosse players (¯X=12.3%) and both the Australian Rules footballers (¯X=8.0%) and track and field athletes (¯X=8.7%).

A stepwise multiple regression on 185 subjects yielded the following equation, which had anR of 0.787:

BD=1.078865 -0.000419 (∑ abdominal, medial calf, front thigh and juxta-nipple skin-folds in mm)+0.000948 (neck circumference in cm)-0.000266 (age in decimal years)-0.000564 (ankle circumference in cm).

Only those predictors which resulted in a significantly increased correlation (p⩽0.05) were included. The standard error of estimate of 0.00537 g · cm−3 was equivalent to 2.3% BF at the mean. This equation was satisfactorily cross-validated against the BD of a separate sample (n=22) from the same population. However, cross-validation of 11 previously published equations indicated that they have limited applicability to State representative sportsmen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carter JEL (1980) The Heath-Carter somatotype method. San Diego State University, San Diego, pp 2.3–2.4

    Google Scholar 

  • Durnin JVGA, Taylor A (1960) Replicability of measurements of density of the human body as determined by underwater weighing. J Appl Physiol 15:142–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Durnin JVGA, Womersley J (1974) Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr 32:77–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth HL, Sinning WE (1973) The anthropometric estimation of body density and lean body weight of male athletes. Med Sci Sports 5:174–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Haisman MF (1970) The assessment of body fat content in young men from measurements of body density and skin-fold thickness. Hum Biol 42:679–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson AS, Pollock ML (1978) Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. Br J Nutr 40:497–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson AS, Pollock ML, Gettman LR (1978) Intertester reliability of selected skinfold and circumference measurements and percent fat estimates. Res Quart 49:546–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Katch FI, McArdle WD (1973) Prediction of body density from simple anthropometric measurements in college-age men and women. Hum Biol 45:445–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys A, Brožek, J (1953) Body fat in adult man. Physiol Rev 33:245–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman TG (1981) Skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness: a review. Hum Biol 53:181–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock ML, Hickman T, Kendrick Z, Jackson A, Linnerud AC, Dawson G (1976) Prediction of body density in young and middle-aged men. J Appl Physiol 40:300–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock ML, Ayres J, Ward A, Jackson A, Linnerud AC (1978) Measurement and prediction of body density in elite runners. In: Landry F, Orban WAR (eds) Biomechanics of sports and kinanthropometry, book 6. Symposia Specialists Inc, Florida, pp 313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross WD, Marfell-Jones MJ (1982) Kinanthropometry. In: MacDougall JD, Wenger HA, Green HJ (eds) Physiological testing of the elite athlete. Mutual Press Ltd, Canada, pp 75–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Siri WE (1961) Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. In: Brokzek J, Henschel A (eds) Techniques for measuring body composition. National Academy of Sciences National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp 223–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan AW (1967) Estimation of body fat in young men. J Appl Physiol 23:311–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JF, Mansfield ER (1984) Body composition prediction in university football players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 16:398–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickkiser JD, Kelly JM (1975) The body composition of a college football team. Med Sci Sports 7:199–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmore JH, Behnke AR (1969) An anthropometric estimation of body density and lean body weight in young men. J Appl Physiol 27:25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmore JH, Haskell WL (1972) Body composition and endurance capacity of professional football players. J Appl Physiol 33:564–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers RT, Whittingham NO, Norton KI, La Forgia J, Ellis MW, Crockett A (1987) Relative body fat and anthropometric prediction of body density of female athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 56:169–180

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by a grant from the Menzies Foundation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Withers, R.T., Craig, N.P., Bourdon, P.C. et al. Relative body fat and anthropometric prediction of body density of male athletes. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol. 56, 191–200 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00640643

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00640643

Key words

Navigation