Skip to main content
Log in

How performatives really work: A reply to searle

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Austin, J. L.: 1962,How to do Things with Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K.: 1975, ‘Performatives Are Statements Too’,Philosophical Studies 28, 229–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K.: 1984, ‘Default Reasoning: Jumping to Conclusions and Knowing When to Think Twice’,Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65, 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K.: 1987,Thought and Reference, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. and R. M. Harnish: 1979,Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1957, ‘Meaning’,Philosophical Review 66, 377–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, R. M.: 1976, ‘Two Consequences of Transparent Subject Position’,Philosophical Studies 30, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, R. M.: 1991, ‘Performatives are Default Reflexive Standardized Indirect Speech Acts’, presented atThe Budapest Conference on Metapragmatic Terms.

  • Searle, J. R.: 1969,Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R.: 1975, ‘Indirect Speech Acts’, in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.),Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R.: 1989, ‘How Performatives Work’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 535–558.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bach, K., Harnish, R.M. How performatives really work: A reply to searle. Linguist Philos 15, 93–110 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635834

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635834

Keywords

Navigation