Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Parametrized sum individuals for plural anaphora

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asher, Nicholas: 1993,Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon and Robin Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon: 1987, ‘Noun Phrases, Generalized Quantifiers, and Anaphora’, in P. Gärden-fors (ed.),Generalized Quantifiers. Linguistic and Logical Approaches, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elworthy, David A. H.: 1995, ‘A Theory of Anaphoric Information’,Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 297–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Garrett: 1980, ‘Pronouns’,Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, Brendan: 1987, ‘The Readings of Plural Noun Phrases in English’,Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1990, ‘Dynamic Montague Grammar’, in L. Kál-lmán and L. Pólos (eds.),Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Logic and Linguistics, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1991, ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic’,Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1982, ‘The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases in English’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published 1988, New York, Garland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1983a, ‘File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness’, in R. Bäuerle, Chr. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp. 164–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1983b, ‘On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions’,Proceedings of the West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics II, 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1990, ‘E-type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora’,Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre Tract 135, Amsterdam. Also in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.) (1984), Truth, Representation and Information, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 277–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle: 1993,From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1992, ‘Definite NPs aren't Quantifiers’,Linguistic Inquiry 23, 156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon, Nirit: 1990, ‘Uniqueness’,Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 273–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Lauri: 1974, ‘Presuppositions and Linguistic Context’,Theoretical Linguistics 1, 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Lauri: 1976, ‘Discourse Referents’, in J. McCawley (ed.),Syntax and Semantics 7. Notes from the Linguistic Underground, Academic Press, New York, pp. 363–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, Peter: 1989, ‘On the Readings of Plural Noun Phrases’,Linguistic Inquiry 9, 177–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, Chr. Schwarze, A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1984, ‘Plural’, Published 1992 in D. Wunderlich and A. von Stechow (eds.),Semantik. Ein Internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, De Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1987, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.),Generalized Quantifiers: Logical and Linguistic Approaches, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moxey, L. M. and A. J. Sanford: 1987, ‘Quantifers and Focus’,Journal of Semantics 5, 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, Reinhard: 1993, ‘A Compositional Discourse Representation Theory’,Proceedings of the 9th Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 467–486.

  • Partee, Barbara: 1984, ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’,Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Stanley, Mark Gawron and John Nerbonne: 1991, ‘The Absorption Principle and Etype Anaphora’. in J. Barwise, J. M. Gawron, G. Plotkin and S. Tutiya (eds.),Anaphora and Quantification in Situation Semantics, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 335–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Craige: 1987,Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Rooth, Mats: 1987, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics, and Situation Semantics’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.),Generalized Quantifers. Linguistic and Logical Approaches, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scha, Remko: 1981, ‘Distributive, Collective and Cumulative Quantification’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Mathematical Centre Tract 135, Amsterdam. Reprinted in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.) (1984), Truth, Representation and Information, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sells, Peter: 1985, ‘Restrictive and Non-Restrictive Modification’,CSLI Report 85-28.

  • Stalnaker, Robert: 1973, ‘Presuppositions’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Robert: 1974, ‘Pragmatic Presupposition’, in M. K. Munitz and P. K. Unger(eds.),Semantics and Philosophy, New YorkUniversity Press, pp. 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Robert: 1978, ‘Assertion’, in P. Cole (ed.),Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, Martin: 1990, ‘A Dynamic Predicate Logic for Plurals’, in M. Stokhof and L. Torenvliet (eds.),Proceedings of the Seventh Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI, Amsterdam, pp. 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sandt, Rob: 1992, ‘Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution’,Journal of Semantics 9, 333–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, Henk: 1993,A Theory of Aspectuality. The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeevat, Henk: 1989, ‘A Compositional Approach to Discourse Representation Theory’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 95–131.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin, 78712, Austin, TX, USA

    Manfred Krifka

Authors
  1. Manfred Krifka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krifka, M. Parametrized sum individuals for plural anaphora. Linguist Philos 19, 555–598 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00632708

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00632708

Keywords

Search

Navigation