Skip to main content
Log in

Heat loss calculation in thermal simulation

  • Published:
Transport in Porous Media Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An appraisal is presented for four different methods that are usually incorporated in thermal simulators to estimate the rate of heat loss to surroundings. The methods are the analytical solution using a superposition theorem, the analytical solution using a numerical approximation to the convolution integral, the semi-analytical solution, and the numerical solution. This appraisal includes expressing the equations in a form that can be incorporated into a fully implicit simulator, computer programming complexity, and the computer CPU time and memory storage requirements. A steam flood problem is used for the comparison, and the gas recovery, oil recovery, and heat loss performances for a reservoir in one and two dimensions are presented.

It is found that the numerical solution is sensitive to grid size in the overburden, the semi-analytical solution is the simplest to program but its prediction is the least accurate, the analytical solution is the most expensive, whereas the analytical-numerical solution combines both accuracy and acceptable storage requirements, and therefore, it is recommended for use in thermal simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

area [m2]

a m :

mth value of a function defined by Equation (15)

B m :

mth convolution integral defined by Equation (14)

b :

constant

c :

specific heat capacity [J/(kg · K) ]

I :

function defined by Equation (22) or (25)

i :

index for time

K :

thermal conductivity [J/(m · d · K)]

k :

upper limit form=14 or 25

l :

penetration depth [m]

N o :

number of grid blocks in overburden

N b :

number of boundary blocks through which heat loss takes place

N max :

maximum number of anticipated time steps

n :

number of time steps

p :

parameter defined by Equation (20)

Q L :

cumulative heat loss

q :

parameter defined by Equation (21)

q L :

instantaneous rate of heat loss [J/d]

¯q L :

average rate of heat loss [J/d]

q *L :

function defined by Equations (7), (10), (12), (23) or (30) [J/d]

T :

temperature in overburden [K]

T o :

initial temperature [K]

T r :

temperature of reservoir boundary block [K]

t :

time [d]

Z :

distance in overburden [m]

α :

thermal diffusivity [m2/d]

γ:

boundary between reservoir and overburden

δt :

time step=t n1−t n[d]

δT :

temperature difference=T n1−T n[K]

ρ :

density of overburden rock [kg/m3]

θ :

T (Z, t)−T o [K]

θ r :

T r(t)−T o [K]

0:

initial condition

i :

time level

L :

loss

m :

index

max:

maximum

n, n+1:

old and new time levels

r :

reservoir at boundary

v :

iteration number

References

  1. Abou-Kassem, J. H., Investigation of grid orientation in a two-dimensional, compositional, threephase steam model, PhD thesis, University of Calgary, 1981.

  2. Souza, A. L. S., Pedrosa, O. A. Jr., and Marchesin, D., A new approach for calculating formation heat losses,Proc. 2nd Internat. Symp. for Enhanced Oil Recovery, Maracaibo, Venezuela, 1987.

  3. Vinsome, P. K. W. and Westerveld, J.,J. Can. Pet. Tech. 19(4), 87 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coats, K. H., George, W. D., Chu, C., and Marcum, B. E.,AIME Trans. 257, 573 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shutler, N. D.,AIME Trans. 249, 405 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weinstein, H. G., Wheeler, J. A., and Woods, E. G.,Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 17(1), 65 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chase, C. A. and O'Dell, P. M.,AIME Trans. 252, 200 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weinstein, H. G.,Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 14(2), 152 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grabowski, J. W. and Aziz, K., A preliminary investigation of in-situ combustion by the method of collocation,Proc. Canada-Venezuela Oil Sands Symposium, Edmonton, Alberta, 1977.

  10. Ferrer, J. and Farouq Ali, S. M.,J. Can. Pet. Tech. 16(1), 78 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coats, K. H.,Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 18(5), 269 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coats, K. H.,Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 20(6), 533 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rubin, B. and Buchanan, W. L.,Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 25(2), 202 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aziz, K., Ramesh, A. B., and Woo, P. T.,J. Pet. Tech. 39(12), 1576 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ito, Y., A one-dimensional computer model for simulating oil recovery by steamflooding, MS Thesis, University of Calgary, 1977.

  16. Hansamuit, V., Compositional simulation of steam injection using continuous mixtures, PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University, 1990.

  17. Abou-Kassem, J. H. and Aziz, K.,Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 24(1), 65 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansamuit, V., Abou-Kassem, J.H. & Farouq Ali, S.M. Heat loss calculation in thermal simulation. Transp Porous Med 8, 149–166 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00617115

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00617115

Key words

Navigation