Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetics of BW 825C: A new antihistamine

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The new H1-receptor antagonist BW 825C and triprolidine (2.5 and 5 mg) were administered to 12 healthy male volunteers in a double blind placebo controlled, balanced, crossover design. Histamine antagonism was measured by assessment of flare and weal areas after intradermal injection of histamine. The 2 compounds were approximately equipotent in blocking the flare and weal response to intradermal histamine and had a similar duration of action. Triprolidine impaired performance of vigilance and reaction time (p<0.05) compared with placebo while BW 825C did not. Drowsiness measured using visual analogue scales followed both triprolidine treatments, but not BW 825C. BW825C had a plasma half-life (t1/2) of 1.7±0.2 h and triprolidine of 4.6±4.3 h. The peak plasma level of BW 825C was approximately 6 times that of triprolidine. It was concluded that BW 825C might be a clinically active H1-antagonist with reduced sedative side-effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bye CE, Clubley ME, Henson T, Peck AW, Smith SA, Smith SE (1979) Changes in the human light reflex as a measure of the anticholinergic effects of drugs. A comparison with other measures. Europ J Clin Pharmacol 15: 21–25

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Angelis RL, Kearney MF, Welch RM (1977) Determination of triprolidine in human plasma by quantitative TLC. J Pharm Sci 66: 841

    Google Scholar 

  3. Findlay JWA, Butz RF, Coker GG, De Angelis RL, Welch RM (1980) Pharmacokinetics of triprolidine in animals and man as measured by a new radioimmunoassay. Pharmacologist 22: 267

    Google Scholar 

  4. Findlay JWA, Butz RF, Coker GG, De Angelis RL, Welch RM (1984) Triprolidine radioimmunoassay: disposition in animals and man. J Pharm Sci (in press)

  5. Fowle ASE, Hughes DTD, Knight GJ (1971) The evaluation of histamine antagonists in man. Europ J Clin Pharmacol 3: 215–220

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hart J, Hill HM, Bye CE, Wilkinson RT, Peck AW (1976) The effects of low doses of amylobarbitone sodium and diazepam on human performance. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3: 289–298

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herxheimer A (1958) A comparison of some atropine like drugs in man with particular reference to their end organ specificity. Brit J Pharmacol 13: 184–192

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leighton HJ, Butz RF, Findlay JWA (1983) BW 825C: a potent antihistamine with low sedation potential. Pharmacologist 25: 163

    Google Scholar 

  9. Metzler CM, Elfring GL, McEwen AJ (1974) A package of computer programs for pharmacokinetic modeling. Biometrics 30: 562

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nicholson AN, Stone BM (1982) Performance studies with the H1-histamine receptor antagonists astemizole and terfenadine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 13: 199–202

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bond A, Lader M (1974) The use of analogue scales in rating of subjective feelings. Br J Med Psychol 47: 211–218

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peck AW, Fowle ASE, By C (1975) A comparison of triprolidine and clemastine on histamine antagonism and performance tests in man. Implications for the mechanism of drug induced drowsiness. Europ J Clin Pharmacol 8: 455–463

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilkinson RT (1970) Methods for research on sleep deprivation and sleep function. Int Psychiatr Clin 7: 369–382

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, A.F., Hamilton, M.J., Liao, S.H.T. et al. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetics of BW 825C: A new antihistamine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 28, 197–204 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00609692

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00609692

Key words

Navigation