Summary
The new H1-receptor antagonist BW 825C and triprolidine (2.5 and 5 mg) were administered to 12 healthy male volunteers in a double blind placebo controlled, balanced, crossover design. Histamine antagonism was measured by assessment of flare and weal areas after intradermal injection of histamine. The 2 compounds were approximately equipotent in blocking the flare and weal response to intradermal histamine and had a similar duration of action. Triprolidine impaired performance of vigilance and reaction time (p<0.05) compared with placebo while BW 825C did not. Drowsiness measured using visual analogue scales followed both triprolidine treatments, but not BW 825C. BW825C had a plasma half-life (t1/2) of 1.7±0.2 h and triprolidine of 4.6±4.3 h. The peak plasma level of BW 825C was approximately 6 times that of triprolidine. It was concluded that BW 825C might be a clinically active H1-antagonist with reduced sedative side-effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bye CE, Clubley ME, Henson T, Peck AW, Smith SA, Smith SE (1979) Changes in the human light reflex as a measure of the anticholinergic effects of drugs. A comparison with other measures. Europ J Clin Pharmacol 15: 21–25
De Angelis RL, Kearney MF, Welch RM (1977) Determination of triprolidine in human plasma by quantitative TLC. J Pharm Sci 66: 841
Findlay JWA, Butz RF, Coker GG, De Angelis RL, Welch RM (1980) Pharmacokinetics of triprolidine in animals and man as measured by a new radioimmunoassay. Pharmacologist 22: 267
Findlay JWA, Butz RF, Coker GG, De Angelis RL, Welch RM (1984) Triprolidine radioimmunoassay: disposition in animals and man. J Pharm Sci (in press)
Fowle ASE, Hughes DTD, Knight GJ (1971) The evaluation of histamine antagonists in man. Europ J Clin Pharmacol 3: 215–220
Hart J, Hill HM, Bye CE, Wilkinson RT, Peck AW (1976) The effects of low doses of amylobarbitone sodium and diazepam on human performance. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3: 289–298
Herxheimer A (1958) A comparison of some atropine like drugs in man with particular reference to their end organ specificity. Brit J Pharmacol 13: 184–192
Leighton HJ, Butz RF, Findlay JWA (1983) BW 825C: a potent antihistamine with low sedation potential. Pharmacologist 25: 163
Metzler CM, Elfring GL, McEwen AJ (1974) A package of computer programs for pharmacokinetic modeling. Biometrics 30: 562
Nicholson AN, Stone BM (1982) Performance studies with the H1-histamine receptor antagonists astemizole and terfenadine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 13: 199–202
Bond A, Lader M (1974) The use of analogue scales in rating of subjective feelings. Br J Med Psychol 47: 211–218
Peck AW, Fowle ASE, By C (1975) A comparison of triprolidine and clemastine on histamine antagonism and performance tests in man. Implications for the mechanism of drug induced drowsiness. Europ J Clin Pharmacol 8: 455–463
Wilkinson RT (1970) Methods for research on sleep deprivation and sleep function. Int Psychiatr Clin 7: 369–382
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, A.F., Hamilton, M.J., Liao, S.H.T. et al. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetics of BW 825C: A new antihistamine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 28, 197–204 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00609692
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00609692