Abstract
A study of the oxidation of directionally solidified Co-W alloys were performed at 750, 900, and 1050°C. The study involved a comparison of the oxidation behavior of directionally solidified and as-cast alloys along with the oxidation behavior of the pure components. The study incorporated both thermogravimetric kinetic measurements and morphological studies of the oxides as a function of both temperature and time. Differences were noticed in both the oxidation rate and the oxide morphology and were attributed to differences in alloy microstructure. The directionally solidified Co-W alloy was found to be more spall resistant but also oxidized more rapidly than the conventionally as-cast alloy. Both alloys were more oxidation resistant than the pure components.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. J. Aliprando and S. R. Shatynski, inNew Developments and Applications in Composites, D. Uhlmann-Wilsdorf and W. C. Harrigan, eds. (Metallurgical Society of AIME, New York, 1979), pp. 31–39.
Metals Handbook, Vol. 8 (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1973).
W. W. Webb, J. T. Norton, and C. Wagner,J. Electrochem. Soc. 103, 107 (1956).
M. E. El-Dahshan, D. P. Whittle, and J. Stringer,Corros. Sci. 16, 77 (1976).
S. Mrowec and Prybylski,Oxid. Met. 11, 365 (1977).
B. Phillips, L. Chang, and M. G. Scroger,Trans. TMS-AIME 233, 1220 (1965).
A. Preece and G. Lucas,J. Inst. Met. 81, 219 (1953).
E. A. Gulbransen and W. S. Wysong,Trans. TMS-AIME 125, 611 (1948).
T. Millner and J. Neugebauer,Nature 163, 601 (1949).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aliprando, J.J., Shatynski, S.R. The oxidation of a directionally solidified cobalt-tungsten eutectic alloy. Oxid Met 15, 455–469 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603537
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603537