Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in complicated cholelithiasis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From January 1990 to December 1992, 129 patients presenting complicated cholelithiasis were included in a prospective study to assess the feasibility and efficiency of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There were 84 females (65%) and 45 males (35%). Mean age was 60 years (range from 23 to 88). There were 90 acute cholecystitis (70%), 14 empyema (11%), 14 cholecystitis on scleroatrophic gallbladder (11%), and 11 mucocele (9%) cases. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been successfully performed in 106 cases (82%)(group I). In this group of patients, morbidity and mortality were 4.7% and 0.9% (n=1), respectively. Mean hospital stay was 4.7 days after uneventful postoperative course. Two patients required reoperation for complications (1.8%). Twenty-three patients (18%) required enforced conversion to laparotomy after unsuccessful laparoscopic procedure (group II). Mean hospital stay was significantly higher in group II (10.8 days,P=0.0001). There was no difference between the two groups according to sex, previous surgery, or indications. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be attempted and successfully realized in complicated cholelithiasis without morbidity increase. Main advantages of this procedure are a shorter hospital stay and a better recovery period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berci G, Sackier JM, Paz-Partlow M (1991) Routine or selected intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 161: 355–360

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cameron JL, Gadacz TR (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 1: 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, Trede M, Troidl (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 385–387

    Google Scholar 

  4. Domergue J, Fabre JM, De Seguin Ch, Lepage B, Baumel H (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute and non-acute cholecystolithiasis. Res Surg 3: 147–149

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edlung G, Ljungdahl M (1990) Acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Am J Surg 159: 414–416

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fabre JM, Prezmyslaw P, De Seguin Ch, Lepage B, Balmes M, Baumel H, Domergue J (1992) Evaluation of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patients with simple and complicated cholecystolithiasis. World J Surg 16: 113–117

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fabre JM, Fagot H, Domergue J, Guillon F, Lepage B, De Seguin Ch, Balmes M, Baumel H (1992) Cholecystectomie coelioscopique dans la lithiase vesiculaire simple et compliquee à propos de 392 cas. Ann Chir 46: 330–334

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Graham SM, Scovill WA, Imbembo AL, Bailey RW (1992) Laparoscopic cholangiography: results and indications. Ann Surg 215: 209–216

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flowers JL, Bailey R, Scovill WA, Zucker KA (1991) The Baltimore experience with laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 161: 388–392

    Google Scholar 

  10. Franklin ME, Vancaillie TG, Daniel C (1992) Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy applicable to patients with acute cholecystitis? J Laparoendosc Surg 2: 159–163

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gutman C (1990) Changing trends in surgery for acute cholecystitis. World J Surg 14: 567–570

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hermann RE (1990) Surgery for acute and chronic cholecystitis. Surg Clin North Am 70: 1263–1275

    Google Scholar 

  13. Larson GM, Vitale GC, Casey J, Evans JS, Gilliam G, Heuser L, McGee G, Rao M, Scherm MJ, Voyles R (1992) Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients. Surgery 163: 221–226

    Google Scholar 

  14. Olsen DO (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 339–344

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg 213: 8–12

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL (1993) Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 217: 233–236

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sackier JM, Berci G, Phillips E, Carroll B, Shapiro S, PazPartlow M (1991) The role of cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 126: 1021–1026

    Google Scholar 

  18. The Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. New Engl J Med 324: 1073–1078

    Google Scholar 

  19. Testas P, Chollet JM, De Watteville JC (1990) Essai d'évaluation de la cholecystectomie par abord coelioscopique. A propos de 2266 malades. Chirurgie 116: 844–847

    Google Scholar 

  20. Trede M, Schaupp W (1990) Support for cholecystectomy — the “gold standard” of gallstone therapy. Chirurg 61: 365–369

    Google Scholar 

  21. Varma JS, King PM (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a safe and effective treatment for severe acute cholecystitis. Br Med J 305: 394–396

    Google Scholar 

  22. Voyles CR, Petro AB, Meena AL, Haick AJ, Koury AM (1991) A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 365–370

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fabre, J.M., Fagot, H., Domergue, J. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in complicated cholelithiasis. Surg Endosc 8, 1198–1201 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00591050

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00591050

Key words

Navigation