Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recombinant immunoblot in the serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis

Comparison with indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Medical Microbiology and Immunology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recombinant immunoblot was developed for detection of IgM and IgG antibodies in patients with Lyme borreliosis. The recombinant antigens were the chromosomal-encodedBorrelia burgdorferi proteins p100, the flagellin and an internal flagellin fragment thereof as well as the plasmid-encoded outer surface proteins A (OspA) and C (OspC). A panel of 144 sera from patients with Lyme borreliosis (erythema migrans,n = 31; neuroborreliosis state II,n = 60; Lyme arthritis,n = 24 and acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans,n =19) have been investigated and the results have been compared to the immunofluorescence absorption test (IFA-ABS) and to two different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays [the flagellin ELISA and a newly developed ELISA (OGP-ELISA)]. The two ELISAs were comparable in sensitivity, whereas the IFA-ABS was less sensitive for IgM antibody but equally sensitive for IgG antibody detection. Immunoblot analysis revealed that IgG antibodies are mainly reactive with p 100 and the internal flagellin fragment (sensitivity 51% and 32%, respectively) and rarely with OspC (14%). All patients with late Lyme borreliosis had IgG antibodies against the p100. IgM antibodies were predominantly directed against OspC (43%) and in a lower extent against the internal flagellin fragment and p100 (15% and 13%, respectively). The complete flagellin was not useful due to a high number of unspecific reactions with control sera and the OspA was only exceptionally reactive in Lyme borreliosis patients. The sensitivity of IgM antibody detection could be increased in cases with early Lyme borreliosis from 46% to 65% when the OspC blot was performed in addition to the flagellin ELISA, or from 56% to 65% when performed in addition to the OGP-ELISA. The recombinant blot is, therefore, a valuable diagnostic test to increase sensitivity of early antibody detection and is regarded as a valuable confirmatory test also in late disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackermann R, Kabatzki J, Boisten HP, Steere AC, Grodzicki RL, Hartung S, Runne U (1984) Spirochäten-Ätiologie der Erythema-chronicum-migrans-Krankheit. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 109:92–97

    Google Scholar 

  2. Assous MV, Postic D, Paul G, Nevot P, Baranton G (1993) Western blot analysis of sera from Lyme borreliosis patients according to the genomic species of the Borrelia strains used as antigens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 12:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barbour AG, Garon CF (1987) Linear plasmids of the bacteriumBorrelia burgdorferi have covalently closed ends. Science 237:409–411

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barbour AG, Schrumpf ME (1986) Polymorphisms of major surface proteins ofBorrelia burgdorferi, Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg 263:83–91

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barbour AG, Burgdorfer W, Grunwald E, Steere AC (1983) Antibodies of patients with Lyme disease to components of the Ixodes dammini spirochete. J Clin Invest 72:504–515

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bruckbauer H, Preac-Mursic V, Fuchs R, Wilske B (1992) Cross-reactive proteins ofBorrelia burgdorferi. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 11:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burgdorfer W, Barbour AG, Hayes SF, Benach JL, Grunwald E, Davis JP (1982) Lyme disease — a tick-borne spirochetosis? Science 216:1317–1319

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coleman JL, Benach JL (1987) Isolation of antigenic components from the Lyme disease spirochete: their role in early diagnosis. J Infect Dis 155:756–765

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coleman JL, Benach JL (1992) Characterization of antigenic determinants ofBorrelia burgdorferi shared by other bacteria. J Infect Dis 165:658–666

    Google Scholar 

  10. Craft EC, Grodzicki RL, Steere AC (1984) Antibody response in Lyme disease: evaluation of diagnostic tests. J Infect Dis 149:789–795

    Google Scholar 

  11. Craft JE, Fischer DK, Shimamoto GT, Steere AC (1986) Antigens ofBorrelia burgdorferi recognize during Lyme disease. J Clin Invest 78:934–939

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dressler F, Whalen JA, Reinhardt BN, Steere AC (1993) Western blotting in the serodiagnosis of Lyme disease. J Infect Dis 167:392–400

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fawcett PT, Rose C, Gibney KN, Chase CA, Kiehl B, Doughty RA (1993) Detection of antibodies to the recombinant P39 protein ofBorrelia burgdorferi using enzyme immunoassay and immunoblotting. J Rheumatol 20:734–738

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fikrig E, Huguenel ED, Berland R, Rahn DW, Hardin JA, Flavell RA (1992) Serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease using recombinant outer surface proteins A and B and flagellin. J Infect Dis 165:1127–32

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fuchs R, Soutschek E, Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V (1990) Identification and molecular characterisation of an immunogenic protein (p100) ofBorrelia burgdorferi. IVth International Conference on Lyme Borreliosis, June 18–21, Stockholm. Programm and Abstracts, Book B:5/W-L-4

  16. Fuchs R, Jauris S, Lottspeich F, Preac-Mursic V, Wilske B, Soutschek E (1992) Molecular analysis and expression of aBorrelia burgdorferi gene encoding a 22 kDa protein (pC) inEscherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 6:503–509

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gassmann GS, Jacobs E, Deutzmann R, Göbel UB (1991) Analysis of theBorrelia burgdorferi GeHo fla Gene and antigenic characterization of its gene product. J Bacteriol 173:1452–1459

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grodzicki RL, Steere AC (1988) Comparison of immunoblotting and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using different antigen preparations for diagnosing early Lyme disease. J Infect Dis 157:790–797

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hansen K, Hindersson P, Pedersen NS (1988) Measurement of antibodies to theBorrelia burgdorferi flagellum improves serodiagnosis in Lyme disease. J Clin Microbiol 26:338–346

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jauris-Heipke S, Fuchs R, Motz M, Preac-Mursic V, Schwab E, Soutschek E, Will G, Wilske B (1993) Genetic heterogeneity of the genes coding for the outer surface protein C (OspC) and the flagellin ofBorrelia burgdorferi. Med Microbiol Immunol 182:37–50

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson RC, Schmid GP, Hyde FW, Steigerwald AG, Brenner DJ (1984)Borrelia burgdorferi sp.nv.: etiologic agent of Lyme disease. Int J Syst Bacteriol 34:436–497

    Google Scholar 

  22. Karlsson M (1990) Western immunoblot and flagellum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. J Clin Microbiol 28:2148–2150

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krause A, Burmester GR, Rensing A, Schoerner C, Schaible UE, Simon MM, Herzer P, Kramer MD, Wallich R (1992) Cellular immune reactivity to recombinant OspA and flagellin fromBorrelia burgdorferi in patients with Lyme borreliosis. J Clin Invest 90:1077–1084

    Google Scholar 

  24. LeFebvre RB, Perng G-C, Johnson RC (1990) The 83-kilodalton antigen ofBorrelia burgdorferi which stimulates immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG responses in infected hosts is expressed by a chromosomal gene. J Clin Microbiol 28:1673–1676

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ma B, Christen B, Leung D, Vigo-Pelfrey C (1992) Serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis by Western immunoblot: reactivity of various significant antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi. J Clin Microbiol 30:370–376

    Google Scholar 

  26. Magnarelli LA, Miller JN, Anderson JF, Riviere GR (1990) Cross-reactivity of nonspecific treponemal antibody in serologic tests for Lyme disease. J Clin Microbiol 28:1276–1279

    Google Scholar 

  27. Peters H (1992) A new ELISA for borrelia-specific IgG using a computer-aided single point antibody quantification method. Abstracts of the Vth International Conference on Lyme Borreliosis, May 30 – June 2, Arlington, Va. Programm and Abstracts: A13a/72

  28. Peters H, Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V, Jirous J, Ruth K (1990) Differences between B. burgdorferi strains affect the reliability of serological tests for Lyme-Borreliosis. Abstracts of the IVth International Conference on Lyme Borreliosis, June 18–21, Stockholm. Programm and Abstracts, Book A: 115/TU-P-71

  29. Rasiah C, Schlitz E, Reichert J, Vogt A (1992) Purification and characterization of a tryptic peptide ofBorrelia burgdorferi flagellin, which reduces cross-reactivity in immunoblots and ELISA. J Gen Microbiol 138:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sadziene A, Wilske B, Ferdows MS, Barbour AG (1993) The cryptic ospC gene ofBorrelia burgdorferi B31 is located on a circular plasmid. Infect Immun 61:2192–2195

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sayahtaheri-Altaie S, Meier FA, Dalton HP (1993) Identification of species-specific, non-cross-reactive proteins ofBorrelia burgdorferi. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 16:43–51

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schmitz JL, Powell CS, Folds JD (1993) Comparison of seven commercial kits for detection of antibodies toBorrelia burgdorferi. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 12:419–424

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schwartz I, Wormser GP, Schwartz JJ, Cooper D, Weissensee P, Gazumyan A, Zimmermann E, Goldberg NS, Bittker S, Campbell GL, Pavia CS (1992) Diagnosis of early Lyme disease by polymerase chain reaction amplification and culture of skin biopsies from erythema migrans skin lesions. J Clin Microbiol 30:3082–3088

    Google Scholar 

  34. Simpson WJ, Burgdorfer W, Schrumpf ME, Karstens RH, Schwan TG (1991) Antibody to a 39-kilodaltonBorrelia burgdorferi antigen (P39) as a marker for infection in experimentally and naturally inoculated animals. J Clin Microbiol 29:236–243

    Google Scholar 

  35. Steere AC (1989) Medical progress — Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 321:586–596

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stiernstedt GT, Granström M, Hederstedt B, Sköldenberg B (1985) Diagnosis of spirochetal meningitis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and indirect immunofluorescent assay in serum and cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol 21:819–825

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wilske B, Schierz G, Preac-Mursic V, Weber K, Pfister HW, Einhäupl K (1984) Serological diagnosis of erythema migrans disease and related disorders. Infection 12:231–337

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V, Schierz G, von Busch K (1986) Immunochemical and immunological analysis of EuropeanBorrelia burgdorferi strains. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [A] 263:92–102

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V, Schierz G, Gueye W, Herzer P, Weber K (1988) Immunochemical analysis of the immune response in late manifestations of Lyme borreliosis. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [A] 267:549–558

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V, Schierz G, Kühbeck R, Barbour AG, Kramer M (1988) Antigenic variability ofBorrelia burgdorferi. Ann NY Acad Sci 539:126–143

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V, Schierz G, Liegl G, Gueye W (1989) Detection of IgM and IgG antibodies toBorrelia burgdorferi using different strains as antigen. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [Suppl] 18:299–309

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V, Fuchs R, Bruckbauer H, Hofmann A, Zumstein G, Jauris S, Soutschek E, Motz M (1990) Immunodominant proteins ofBorrelia burgdorferi; implications for improving serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. In: Neu HC (ed) New antibacterial strategies. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp47–63

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wilske B, Bader L, Pfister HW, Preac-Mursic V (1991) Diagnostik der Lyme-Neuroborreliose (Nachweis der intrathekalen Antikörperbildung). Fortschr Med 109:441–446

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wilske B, Barbour AG, Bergström S, Burman N, Restrepo BI, Rosa PA, Schwan T, Soutschek E, Wallich R (1992) Antigenic variation and strain heterogeneity inBorrelia spp. Res Microbiol 143:583–596

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V, Göbel UB, Graf B, Jauris S, Soutschek E, Schwab E, Zumstein G (1993) An OspA serotyping system forBorrelia burgdorferi based on reactivity with monoclonal antibodies and OspA sequence analysis. J Clin Microbiol 31:340–350

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V, Jauris S, Hofmann A, Pradel I, Soutschek E, Schwab E, Will G, Wanner G (1993) Immunological and molecular polymorphisms of OspC, an immunodominant major outer surface protein ofBorrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun 61:2182–2191

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zöller L, Burkard S, Schäfer H (1991) Validity of Western immunoblot band patterns in the serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. J Clin Microbiol 29:174–182

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zumstein G, Fuchs R, Hofmann A, Preac-Mursic V, Soutschek E, Wilske B (1992) Genetic polymorphism of the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (OspA) ofBorrelia burgdorferi. Med Microbiol Immunol 181:57–70

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max von Pettenkofer Institut für Hygiene und Medizinische Mikrobiologie der Universität München, Pettenkoferstrasse 9a, D-80336, München, Germany

    B. Wilske, V. Fingerle, A. Hofmann, G. Lehnert & V. Preac-Mursic

  2. Medizinische Poliklinik der Universität München, Pettenkoferstrasse 8a, D-80336, München, Germany

    P. Herzer

  3. Behringwerke AG, D-35001, Marburg, Germany

    H. Peters

  4. Klinikum Großhadern, Neurologische Klinik der Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, D-81377, München, Germany

    H. W. Pfister

  5. Mikrogen GmbH, Westendstrasse 125/G, D-80339, München, Germany

    E. Soutschek

  6. Dermatologist in private practice, Rosenstrasse 6, D-80331, München, Germany

    K. Weber

Authors
  1. B. Wilske
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Fingerle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Herzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Hofmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. Lehnert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H. Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. H. W. Pfister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. V. Preac-Mursic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. E. Soutschek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. K. Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilske, B., Fingerle, V., Herzer, P. et al. Recombinant immunoblot in the serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Med Microbiol Immunol 182, 255–270 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00579624

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00579624

Keywords

Search

Navigation