Abstract
Shape and size are the most important defect characteristics that need to be determined for the reliable prediction of the remaining service lifetime of a defective structure or part. The analytical and supporting experimental results presented in this paper concern a general, pattern recognition-based, ultrasonic defect identification and sizing method. The satellite-pulse technique (SPT) is based on the interpretation, in terms of defect types (shapes) and dimensions, of the separation in time of arrival between the readily detected specularly reflected pulse and its generally ignored tip-diffracted or tangentially scattered “satellite” contained in the received waveform. Calibration procedures were also developed that enable the ultrasonic examiner to read the time scale of the oscilloscope for equivalent crack depth or void diameter as appropriate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Hoeller, W. Gebhardt, and W. Mueller,Materialpruefung 22:32 (1980) (in German).
G. J. Gruber, Development of relationships between defect characteristics and signal parameters, Final Report 17-9210, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Tex. (1979).
B. T. Khuri-Yakub, G. S. Kino, and Y. Murakami, Ultrasonic wave scattering for defect characterization applied to ceramic materials, Paper presented at 38th American Society for Nondestructive Testing Conference, Denver, Colo., October (1978).
A. Freedman,Acustica 12:61 (1962).
A. Freedman,Acustica 12:10 (1962).
D. M. Johnson,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59:1319 (1976).
A. J. Rudgers,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 45:900 (1969).
W. Sachse,Mater. Eval. 35:83 (1977).
Y. H. Pao and Y. Varadan, inProceedings of the 1977 ARPA/AFML Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Report No. AFML-TR-78-55, pp. 92–98 (1978).
Y. H. Pao and W. J. Sachse,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56:1478 (1974).
F. Bifulco and W. Sachse,Ultrasonics 13:113 (1975).
W. Sachse and C. T. Chian,Mater. Eval. 33:81 (1975).
R. E. Beissner and G. L. Burkhardt, The quantitative characterization of flaws by ultrasonic scattering, Final Technical Report 15-9150, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Tex. (1976).
R. C. McMaster (ed.),Nondestructive Testing Handbook (Ronald Press, New York 1963).
R. S. Sharpe (ed.),Research Techniques in Nondestructive Testing (Academic Press, New York, 1977), Chaps. 1 and 2.
J. Seydel,Computerized Enhancement of Ultrasonic Nondestructive Testing Data, Doctoral dissertation (University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, 1973).
J. B. Keller,J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52:116 (1962).
J. D. Achenbach, A. K. Gautesen, and H. McMaken, inProceedings of the 1977 ARPA/AFML Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Report No. AFML-TR-78-55, pp. 102–107 (1978).
C. H. Wells and F. E. Gelhaus, inProceedings of 1980 Review of Nondestructive Evaluation Programs (Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Ca. 1980).
V. D. Koryachenko,Soviet J. NDT 11:69 (1975).
G. J. Gruber, inAbstract Proceedings of the 1980 Annual Meeting of the German Society of Nondestructive Testing in Goettingen, May 12–14 (1980) (in German).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gruber, G.J. Defect identification and sizing by the ultrasonic satellite-pulse technique. J Nondestruct Eval 1, 263–276 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571807
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571807