Skip to main content
Log in

Defect identification and sizing by the ultrasonic satellite-pulse technique

  • Published:
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shape and size are the most important defect characteristics that need to be determined for the reliable prediction of the remaining service lifetime of a defective structure or part. The analytical and supporting experimental results presented in this paper concern a general, pattern recognition-based, ultrasonic defect identification and sizing method. The satellite-pulse technique (SPT) is based on the interpretation, in terms of defect types (shapes) and dimensions, of the separation in time of arrival between the readily detected specularly reflected pulse and its generally ignored tip-diffracted or tangentially scattered “satellite” contained in the received waveform. Calibration procedures were also developed that enable the ultrasonic examiner to read the time scale of the oscilloscope for equivalent crack depth or void diameter as appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Hoeller, W. Gebhardt, and W. Mueller,Materialpruefung 22:32 (1980) (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. J. Gruber, Development of relationships between defect characteristics and signal parameters, Final Report 17-9210, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Tex. (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. T. Khuri-Yakub, G. S. Kino, and Y. Murakami, Ultrasonic wave scattering for defect characterization applied to ceramic materials, Paper presented at 38th American Society for Nondestructive Testing Conference, Denver, Colo., October (1978).

  4. A. Freedman,Acustica 12:61 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Freedman,Acustica 12:10 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. M. Johnson,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59:1319 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. J. Rudgers,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 45:900 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Sachse,Mater. Eval. 35:83 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. H. Pao and Y. Varadan, inProceedings of the 1977 ARPA/AFML Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Report No. AFML-TR-78-55, pp. 92–98 (1978).

  10. Y. H. Pao and W. J. Sachse,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56:1478 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Bifulco and W. Sachse,Ultrasonics 13:113 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Sachse and C. T. Chian,Mater. Eval. 33:81 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. E. Beissner and G. L. Burkhardt, The quantitative characterization of flaws by ultrasonic scattering, Final Technical Report 15-9150, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Tex. (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. C. McMaster (ed.),Nondestructive Testing Handbook (Ronald Press, New York 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. S. Sharpe (ed.),Research Techniques in Nondestructive Testing (Academic Press, New York, 1977), Chaps. 1 and 2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Seydel,Computerized Enhancement of Ultrasonic Nondestructive Testing Data, Doctoral dissertation (University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. B. Keller,J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52:116 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. D. Achenbach, A. K. Gautesen, and H. McMaken, inProceedings of the 1977 ARPA/AFML Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Report No. AFML-TR-78-55, pp. 102–107 (1978).

  19. C. H. Wells and F. E. Gelhaus, inProceedings of 1980 Review of Nondestructive Evaluation Programs (Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Ca. 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. D. Koryachenko,Soviet J. NDT 11:69 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. J. Gruber, inAbstract Proceedings of the 1980 Annual Meeting of the German Society of Nondestructive Testing in Goettingen, May 12–14 (1980) (in German).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gruber, G.J. Defect identification and sizing by the ultrasonic satellite-pulse technique. J Nondestruct Eval 1, 263–276 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571807

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571807

Key words

Navigation