Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Woodstove emission measurement methods: Comparison and emission factors update

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On February 26, 1988, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency promulgated Standards of Performance for residential wood heaters, or woodstoves. Over the past several years, a number of field studies have been undertaken to determine the actual level of emission reduction achieved by new technology woodstoves in everyday use. These studies have required the development and use of particulate and gaseous emission sampling equipment compatible with operation in private houses. Since woodstoves are tested for certification in the laboratory using EPA Methods 5G and 5H, it is of substantial interest to determine the correlation between these regulatory methods and the in-house equipment. Two in-house sampling systems have been used most widely. One is an intermittent, pump-driven particulate sampler which collects particulate and condensable organics on a filter and organic adsorbent resin. Oxygen concentration is measured by a sensor in the sample line. The sampler is controlled by a data logger which also records other parameters of interest. The second system uses an evacuated cylinder as the motive force. Particulate and condensable organics are collected in a condenser and dual filter. The sampler operates continuously whenever the stack temperature is above the set point. Average stack gas concentrations are measured from the evacuated cylinder at the conclusion of the sampling period. Both samplers were designed to operate unattended for 1-week periods. A large number of tests have been run comparing Methods 5G and 5H to both of the field samplers. This paper presents these comparison data and determines the relationships between laboratory certification sampling methods and field samplers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 40 CFR: 1985, Ch. 1, ‘Air Pollution Control; Regulation of Polycyclic Organic Matter Under the Clean Air Act; Proposed Rule’,Federal Register, February 13, 5579–5583.

  2. 40 CFR: 1985, Part 60, ‘Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources; Residential Wood Combustion; Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking’,Federal Register, August 2, 31503–31506.

  3. 40 CFR: 1988, Part 60, ‘Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources; New Residential Wood Heaters’,Federal Register, February 26, 5860–5926.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors: 1990, Volume I: ‘Stationary Point and Area Sources’, AP-42, Supplement C (GPO 055-000-00369-6), September.

  5. Burnet, P.G.: 1987, ‘The Northeast Cooperative Woodstove Study’, Volume I, EPA-600/7-87-026a, and Volume II — Technical Appendix, EPA-600/7-87-026b (NTIS PB88-140769 and-140777, respectively), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, November.

  6. Houck, J.E., Simons, C.A., Burnet, P.G., and Merrill, R.G.: 1986, ‘A System to Obtain Time Integrated Woodstove Emission Samples’, InProceedings: 1986 EPA/APCA Symposium on Measurement of Toxic Air Pollutants, Raleigh, April, EPA-600/9-86-013 (NTIS PB87-182713).

  7. Simons, C.A., Christiansen, P.D., Pritchett, L.C., and Beyerman, G.A.: 1987, ‘Whitehorse Efficient Woodheat Demonstration’, Prepared for the City of Whitehorse, 2121 Second Av., Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada, Y1A 1C2, September.

  8. Simons, C.A., Christiansen, P.D., Houck, J.E., and Pritchett, L.C.: 1989, ‘Woodstove Emission Sampling Methods Comparability Analysis andIn-situ Evaluation of New Technology Woodstoves’, EPA-600/7-89-002 (NTIS DE89-001551), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, January.

  9. Barnett, S.G.: 1990, ‘Field Performance of Advanced Technology Woodstoves in Glens Falls, NY, 1988–89’, Volume I, EPA-600/7-90-019a, and Volume II, Technical Appendices, EPA-600/7-90-019b (NTIS PB91-125641 and -125658, respectively), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, October.

  10. Jaasma, D.R. and Champion, M.R.: 1989, ‘Field Performance of Woodburning Stoves in Crested Butte During the 1988–89 Heating Season’, Prepared for the Town of Crested Butte, Crested Butte, CO, June.

  11. Jaasma, D.R., Gundappa, M., Champion, M.R., and McCrillis, R.C.: 1991, ‘Field Performance of Woodburning Stoves in Crested Butte, Colorado’, inProceedings: 84th Annual Meeting, AWMA, Paper No. 91–130.1, Vancouver, June.

  12. Barnett, S.G.: 1990, ‘In-Home Evaluation of Emission Characteristics of EPA-Certified High Technology Non-Catalytic Woodstoves in Klamath Falls, Oregon, 1990’, Prepared for the Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology, Energy Mines and Resources Canada, DSS File No. 14SQ.23440-9-9230. June 1.

  13. Dernbach, S.: 1990, ‘Woodstove Field Performance in Klamath Falls, Oregon’, Prepared for the Wood Heating Alliance, April 18.

  14. Simons, C.A. and Jones, S.K.: 1991, ‘Performance Evaluation of the Best Existing Stove Technology (BEST) Hybrid Woodstove and Catalytic Retrofit Device’, Prepared for the State or Oregon, Department of Environmental Quality, 811 SW Sixth Street, Portland, OR 97204.

  15. Barnett, S.G., Roholt, R., and Houck, J.: 1990, ‘1. Field Performance of Best Existing Stove Technology (BEST) Hybrid Woodstoves in their Second Year of Use. 2. Evaluation of a Modified Evacuated Cylinder Particulate Emission Sampler (MECS)’, Prepared for the State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, August 3.

  16. Barnett, S.G. and Roholt, R.B.: 1990, ‘In-Home Performance of Certified Pellet Stoves in Medford and Klamath Falls, Oregon’, Prepared for the Department of Energy and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, DOE/BP-04143-1, August.

  17. Oregon Administrative Rules: 1984, Chapter 340, Division 21, -100-190.

  18. Jaasma, J.R., Champion, M.C., and Shelton, J.W.: 1990, ‘Woodstove Smoke and CO Emissions: Comparison of Reference Methods with the VPI Sampler’,J. Air & Waste Management Assoc. 40, 886–871.

    Google Scholar 

  19. ‘Woodstove Test Method and Fuel Comparison Study — EPA Method 5G vs VPI, Modified EPA Method 28 vs Cordwood, RTP, North Carolina, and Crested Butte, Colorado, 1989’, EPA-WHA-Special Study, Prepared for Dennis Holzschuh, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emission Measurements Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, May 18, 1990.

  20. Cottone, L.E. and Messer, E.: 1986, ‘Test Method Evaluations and Emissions Testing for Rating Wood Stoves’, EPA-600/2-86-100 (NTIS PB87-119897), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, October.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 27711, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, U.S.A.

    Robert C. Mccrillis

  2. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 24061, Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A.

    Dennis R. Jaasma

Authors
  1. Robert C. Mccrillis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dennis R. Jaasma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mccrillis, R.C., Jaasma, D.R. Woodstove emission measurement methods: Comparison and emission factors update. Environ Monit Assess 24, 1–12 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00568795

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00568795

Keywords

Search

Navigation