Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic differentiation ofDrosophila melanogaster populations as assessed by two-dimensional electrophoresis

  • Published:
Biochemical Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seven populations ofDrosophila melanogaster, representing a worldwide distribution, were compared using two-dimensional protein gel electrophoresis. A total of 611 protein spots was scored, which probably represent a sample of over 500 loci that were surveyed. Of the protein spots scored, 521 spots were found to be invariant, but another 90 spots were found to be variable among the populations. Of these variable protein spots, 12 were found to be present in only one population. All the populations, except one, had at least one protein spot restricted to itself. However, the Japanese population had by far the most, with five protein spots restricted to this one population, which has been observed in previous studies of private alleles in oriental populations. The mean genetic similarity (F) found among the seven populations was 0.965, with a range of between 0.956 and 0.977. This is similar to previous reports of lower variation found in population genetic surveys using two-dimensional electrophoresis. It was found that the historical relationships among these populations was somewhat congruent with the geographic distribution of the populations, but as in previous studies, it was not exactly coincident.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, N. L. (1988).Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis. Operation of the ISO-DALT System Large Scale Biology Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. G., and Anderson, N. L. (1978). Analytical techniques for cell fractions. XXI. Two-dimensional analysis of serum and tissue proteins: multiple isoelectric focusing.Anal. Biochem. 85331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquadro, C. F., and Avise, J. C. (1981). Genetic divergence between rodent species assessed by using two-dimensional electrophoresis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 783784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avise, J. C., Arnold, J., Ball, R. M., Bermingham, E., Lamb, T., Neigel, J. E., Reeb, C. A., and Saunders, N. C. (1987). Intraspecific phylogeography: The mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics.Annu. Rev. Syst. Ecol. 18489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthart, M. B., and Singh, R. S. (1988a). Differing amounts of genetic polymorphism in testes of male accessory glands ofDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Biochem. Genet. 26153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthart, M. B., and Singh, R. S. (1988b). Low genic variation in male-reproductive-tract proteins ofDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans.Mol. Biol. Evol. 5167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthart, M. B., and Singh, R. S. (1988c). High level of divergence of male-reproductive-tract proteins, betweenDrosophila melanogaster and its sibling species,D. simulans.Mol. Biol. Evol. 5182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. A., and Milstead, B. (1987). Long-distance migration ofDrosophila. 3. Dispersal ofD. melanogaster alleles from a Maryland orchard.Am. Nat. 13070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dice, L. R. (1941). Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species.Ecology 26297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap.Evolution 39783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guevara, J., Johnston, D. A., Ramagali, L. S., Martin, B. A., Capetillo, S., and Rodriguez, L. V. (1982). Quantitative aspects of silver deposition in proteins resolved in complex polyacrylamide gels.Electrophoresis 3197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, L. R., and Singh, R. S. (1986). Extensive variation and heteroplasmy in size of mitochondrial DNA among geographic populations ofDrosophila melanogaster.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 838813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, H. H. (1984). Improved record keeping and photography of silver-stained two-dimensional electrophoretograms by way of “XRD images.”Clin. Chem. 301981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendy, M. D., and Penny, D. (1982). Branch and bound algorithms to determine minimal evolutionary trees.Math. Biosci. 59277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.-Y., Charles, D., Bronson, D., Griffen, M., and Bennett, L. (1979). Analyses of mouse andDrosophila proteins by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.Mol. Gen. Genet. 174303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh Brown, A. J., and Langley, C. H. (1979). Reevaluation of genic heterozygosity in natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster by two-dimensional electrophoresis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 762381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. (1974).Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margush, T., and McMorris, F. R. (1981). Consensus n-trees.Bull. Math. Biol. 43239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickevich, M. F., and Johnson, M. S. (1976). Congruence between morphological and allozyme data in evolutionary inference and character evolution.Syst. Zool. 25260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickevich, M. F., and Mitter, C. (1981). Treating polymorphic characters in systematics: A phylogenetic treatment of electrophoretic data. In Funk, F. A., and Brooks, D. R. (eds.),Advances in Cladistics Allen Press, Lawrence, Kans., pp. 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. (1972). Genetic distances between populations.Am. Nat. 106283.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell, P. H. (1975). High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis.J. Biol. Chem. 2504007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnishi, S., Leigh Brown, A. J., Voelker, R. A., and Langley, C. H. (1982). Estimation of genetic variability in natural populations ofDrosophila simulans by two-dimensional and starch gel electrophoresis.Genetics 100127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnishi, S., Kawanishi, M., and Watanabe, T. K. (1983). Biochemical phylogenies ofDrosophila: Protein differences detected by two-dimensional electrophoresis.Genetica 6155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, S. (1977). Genetic divergence in closely related sibling speciesDrosophila pseudoobscura, Drosophila persimilis, andDrosophila miranda.Evolution 3114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racine, R. R., and Langley, C. H. (1980). Genetic heterozygosity in a natural population ofMus musculus assessed using two-dimensional electrophoresis.Nature 283855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J. (1990).NTSYS-pc. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System (ver 1.60), Exeter, Setauket, N.Y.

  • Sanderson, M. J. (1989). Confidence limits on phylogenies: The bootstrap revisited.Cladistics 5113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. S., and Rhomberg, L. R. (1987a). A comprehensive study of genic variation in natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. I. Estimates of gene flow from rare alleles.Genetics 115313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. S., and Rhomberg, L. R. (1987b). A comprehensive study of genic variation in natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. II. Estimates of heterozygosity and patterns of geographic differentiation.Genetics 117255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. S., Hickey, D. A., and David, J. (1982). Genetic differentiation between geographically distant populations ofDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 101235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. S., Choudhary, M., and David, J. (1987). Contrasting patterns of geographic variation in the cosmopolitan speciesDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Biochem. Genet. 2527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, R. R. (1973).Numerical Taxonomy W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Sneath, P. H. A. (1963).Principles of Numerical Taxonomy W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, G. S. (1988a). The effects of culture media on the two-dimensional electrophoretic pattern ofDrosophila virilis.Dros. Inf. Serv. 6774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, G. S. (1988b). Molecular evolution among someDrosophila species groups as indicated by two-dimensional electrophoresis.J. Mol. Evol. 27250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, G. S. (1991). Molecular evolution and phylogeny of theDrosophila virilis species group as inferred by two-dimensional electrophoresis.J. Mol. Evol. 33 (in press).

  • Swofford, D. L. (1990).PAUP. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (ver 3.0n), Ill. Nat. Hist. Surv., Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, P. A., and Dickinson, W. J. (1988). The use of regulatory patterns in constructing phylogenies.Syst. Zool. 3797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitt, G. S. (1987). Species differences in isozyme tissue patterns: their utility for systematic and evolutionary analysis. In Rattazzi, M. C., Scandalios, J. G., and Whitt, G. S. (eds.),Isozymes: Current Topics in Biological and Medical Research, Vol. 10 Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spicer, G.S., Fleming, J.E. Genetic differentiation ofDrosophila melanogaster populations as assessed by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Biochem Genet 29, 389–401 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00554145

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00554145

Key words

Navigation