Skip to main content
Log in

Application of DNA fingerprinting to population study of chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra)

  • Published:
Biochemical Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hypervariable minisatellite DNA probes 33.15 and 33.6, originally developed for studies in human populations, were used to study genetic variation in chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra). The mean number of bands per individual was 25 for probe 33.15 and 15 for probe 33.6. The average band frequency was 0.33 for both probes. The mean similarity was 0.44, greater than that reported for human and natural populations and close to values found in domestic populations of mammals. This lack of variability could be related to the bottleneck suffered by the population due to large-scale hunting after the Spanish Civil War. Levels of variability are high compared with variability at the level of protein markers, so the use of minisatellite DNA is recommended for future population studies in this species. We did not find large genetic differences between subpopulations, indicating that the population is genetically homogeneous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armour, J. A., and Jeffreys, A. J. (1992). Biology and applications of human minisatellite loci.Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. S., Gilbert, D. A., Weinrich, M. T., Lambertsen, R., Calambokidis, J., McArdle, B., Chambers, G. K., and O'Brien, S. J. (1993). Population characteristics of DNA fingerprints in humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae).J. Hered. 84281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, T., Hanotte, O., Bruford, M. W., and Cairns, E. (1991). Multilocus and single locus minisatellite analysis in population biological studies. In Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A. J., and Wolff, R. (eds.),DNA Fingerprinting Approaches and Applications Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp. 154–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Gouyon, B., Julier, C., Avner, P., Georges, M., and Lathrop, M. (1991). Human variable number of tandem repeat probes as a source of polymorphic markers in experimental animals. In Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A. J., and Wolff, R. (eds.),DNA Fingerprinting Approaches and Applications Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp. 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges, M. S., Lequarré, A. S., Castelli, M., Hanset, R., and Vassart, G. (1988). DNA fingerprinting in domestic animals using four different minisatellite probes.Cytogenet. Cell. Genet. 47127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. A., Lehman, N., O'Brien, S. J., and Wayne, R. K. (1990). Genetic fingerprinting reflects population differentiation in the California Channel Island fox.Nature 344764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanotte, O., Bruford, M. W., and Burke, T. (1992). Multilocus DNA fingerprints in gallinaceous birds: General approach and problems.Heredity 68481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, A. J., and Morton, D. B. (1987). DNA fingerprints of dogs and cats.Anim. Genet. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V., and Thein, S. L. (1985a). Hypervariable “minisatellite” regions in human DNA.Nature 31667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V., Thein, S. L., (1985b). Individual specific “fingerprints” of human DNA.Nature 31676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V., Thein, S. L., Weatherall, D. J., and Ponder, B. A. J. (1986). DNA “fingerprints” and segregation analysis of multiple markers in human pedigrees.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 3911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, A. J., Royle, N. J., Patel, I., Armour, J. A., MacLeod, A., Collick, A., Gray, I. C., Neumann, R., Gibbs, M., Crosier, M.,et al. (1991). Principles and recent advances in human DNA fingerprinting. InDNA Fingerprinting Approaches and Applications Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. S., Lessells, C. M., and Krebs, R. J. (1991). Helpers-at-the-nest in European bee-eaters (Merops apieaster): A genetic analysis. In Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A. J., and Wolff, R. (eds.),DNA Fingerprinting Approaches and Applications Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp. 169–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1990). The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting.Mol. Biol. Evol. 7478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1991). Analysis of population genetics structure by DNA fingerprinting. In Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A. J., and Wolff, R. (eds.),DNA Fingerprinting Approaches and Applications Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp. 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., and Hartl, G. B. (1986). Genetic variation in two alpine populations of chamois,Rupicapra rupicapra L.Z. Säugetierkunde 51114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. S., Sargeant, L. L., King, T. J., Mattick, J. S., Georges, M., and Hetzel, D. J. (1991). The conservation of dinucleotide microsatellites among mammalian genomes allows the use of heterologous PCR primer pairs in closely related species.Genomics 10654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mörsch, G., and Leibenguth, F. (1994). DNA fingerprinting in roe deer using the digoxigenated probe (GTG)5.Anim. Genet. 2525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nascetti, G., Lovari, S., Lanfranchi, P., Berducou, C., Mattiucci, S., Rossi, L., and Bullini, L. (1985). Revision of Rupicapra genus. III. Electrophoretic studied demonstrating species distinction of chamois populations of the Alps from those of the Apennines and Pyrenees. In Lovari, S. (ed.),Biology and Management of Mountain Ungulates Croom-Helm, Pondon, pp. 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nores, C., and Vazquez, V. M. (1987).La conservación de los vertebrados terrestres asturianos Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Urbanismo, Centro de Publicaciones, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, J. M., King, P. W., Lovari, S., and Bauchau, V. (1989). Genetic variation in the Alpine chamois with special reference to the subspeciesRupicapra rupicapra cartusiana.Z. Säugetierkunde 54243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, J. M., Albon, S. D., Guinness, F. E., Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Dover, G. A. (1992). Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal.Behav. Ecol. 366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989).Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, J. C., Gilbert, D. A., Ceci, J. D., Yuhki, N., and O'Brien, S. J. (1992). Estimation of heterozygosity for single-probe multilocus DNA fingerprints.Mol. Biol. Evol. 9729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz, D. (1989). Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers.Nucleic Acids Res. 176463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. C., Graves, J. A., Murray, N. D., and Sherwin, W. B. (1991). Conservation genetics of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). II. Limited variability in minisatellite DNA sequences.Biochem. Genet. 29355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommelen, G. J., Den Daas, J. H., Vijg, J., and Uitterlinden, A. G. (1993). DNA profiling of cattle using micro- and minisatellite core probes.Biochem. Genet. 24235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetton, J. H., Carter, R., Parkin, D. T., and Walters, D. (1987). Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA fingerprinting.Nature 327147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pérez, T., Albornoz, J., Garcia-Vazquez, E. et al. Application of DNA fingerprinting to population study of chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra). Biochem Genet 34, 313–320 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00553903

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00553903

Key words

Navigation