Skip to main content
Log in

CT of the postoperative lumbar spine: the value of intravenous contrast

  • Originals
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Sixty-five patients with recurrent radicular complaints after operation for lumbar disc herniation underwent CT examination before and after intravenous contrast application (volume: 1.5–2.0 ml/kg body weight; flow rate: 0.35 ml/s). Postsurgical hypertrophic scar tissue showed definite contrast enhancement, whereas disc herniation remained unenhanced. Intravenous contrast application is recommended in patients previously operated upon for disc herniation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cameron R (1962) Inflammation and repair. In: Robbins StL (ed) Textbook of pathology. Saunders, Philadelphia London pp 61–87

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carrera GF, Williams AL, Haughton VM (1980) Computed tomography in sciatica. Radiology 137: 433–437

    Google Scholar 

  3. Claussen C, Grumme Th, Treisch J, Lochner B, Kazner E (1982) Die Diagnostik des lumbalen Bandscheibenvorfalls. Fortschr Röntgenstr 136:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hamperl H (1968) Lehrbuch der allgemeinen Pathologie und der pathologischen Anatomie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mall JC, Kaiser JA, Heithoff KB (1983) Postoperative spine. In: Newton ThH, Potts DG (eds) Computed tomography of the spine and spinal cord. Clavadel Press, San Anselmo 187–204

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pfadenhauer K, Ebeling U, Bergleiter R, Stocter P (1983) Zuverlässigkeit der Computertomographie bei der Diagnostik von Rezidivbeschwerden nach lumbalen Bandscheibenoperationen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 139:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schubiger O, Valavanis A (1982) CT differentiation between recurrent disc herniation and postoperative scar formation: the value of contrast enhancement. Neuroradiology 22: 251–254

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teplick JG, Haskin ME (1984) Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the postoperative lumbar spine: improved identification of recurrent disk herniation, scar, arachnoiditis, and distitis. Am J Roentgenol 143:845–855

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weiss Th, Treisch J, Claussen C, Banzer D (1983) Irrtumsmöglichkeiten und Schwierigkeiten in der computertomographischen Diagnostik lumbaler Bandscheibenvorfälle. Fortschr Röntgenstr 138:54–60

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weiss Th, Treisch J, Kazner E, Claussen C, Schörner W, Fiegler W (1984) Intravenöse Kontrastmittelgabe bei der Computertomographie (CT) der operierten Lendenwirbelsäule. Fortschr Röntgenstr 141:30–34

    Google Scholar 

  11. Williams AL, Haughton VM, Syvertsen A (1980) Computed tomography in the diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus. Radiology 135:95–99

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiss, T., Treisch, J., Kazner, E. et al. CT of the postoperative lumbar spine: the value of intravenous contrast. Neuroradiology 28, 241–245 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00548198

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00548198

Key words

Navigation