Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring global change: Comparison of forest cover estimates using remote sensing and inventory approaches

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Satellite-based remote sensing offers great potential for frequent assessment of forest cover over broad spatial scales, however, calibration and validation using ground-based surveys are needed. In this study, forest cover estimates for the United States from a recently developed land surface cover map generated from satellite remote sensing data were compared to state-level inventory data from the U.S. National Resources Planning Act Timber Database. The land cover map was produced at the U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center and is based on imagery from the AVHRR sensor (spatial resolution ∼1.1 km). Vegetation type was classified using the temporal signal in the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index derived from AVHRR data. Comparisons revealed close agreement in the estimate of forest cover for extensively forested states with large polygons of relatively similar vegetation such as Oregon. Larger forest cover differences were observed in other states with some regional patterns in the level of agreement apparent.

Comparisons in inventory- and remote sensing-based estimates of current forested area with potential vegetation maps indicated the magnitude of past land use change and the potential for future changes. The remote sensing approach appears to hold promise for conducting surveys of forest cover where inventory data are limited or where rates of vegetation change, due to human or climatic factors, are rapid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Box, E.O., Holben, B.N., and Kalb, V.: 1989. ‘Accuracy of the AVHRR Vegetation Index as a Predictor of Biomass, Primary Productivity and Net CO2 Flux’, Vegetatio 80, 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P.J.: 1983, ‘Multispectral Remote Sensing for the Estimation of Green Leaf Area Index’, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 309, 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre, F.H. (Ed.): 1980, Forest Cover Types of the United States and Canada, Soc. Amer. Foresters, Washington, DC., 148 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedney, D.R., Bassett, P.M., and Mei, M.A.: 1986, Timber Resource Statistics for Non-Federal Forest Land in Southwest Oregon, USDA Forest Service Resource Bulletin PNW-138, Portland, Or, 26 pp.

  • Goward, S.M., Markham, B., Dye, D.G., Dulaney, W., and Yang, J.: 1991, ‘Normalized Difference Vegetation Index Measurements from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer’, Remote Sens. Environ. 35, 257–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, R.A., Hobbie, J.E., Melillo, J.M., Moore, B., Peterson, B.J., Shaver, G.R., and Woodwell, G.M.: 1983, ‘Changes in the Carbon Content of Terrestrial Biota and Soils between 1860 and 1980: Net Releases of CO2 to the Atmosphere’, Ecol. Monog. 53, 235–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, R.A.: 1991, ‘Tropical Deforestation and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide’, Clim. Change 19, 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, L.R., Cook, E.A., and Graham, R.L.: 1989a, ‘A Technique for Extrapolating and Validating Forest Cover across Large Regions: Calibrating AVHRR Data with TM Data’, Int. J. Remote Sensing 10, 1805–1812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, L.R., Graham, R.L., and Cook, E.A.: 1989b, ‘Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing to Forested Ecosystems’, Lands. Ecol. 3, 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchler, A.W.: 1964, Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States, Amer. Geogr. Soc., Spec. Publ. 36, 110 pp.

  • Lashof, D.A.: 1989, ‘The Dynamic Greenhouse: Feedback Processes That May Influence Future Concentrations of Atmospheric Trace Gases and Climate Change’, Clim. Change 14, 213–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveland, T.R., Merchant, J.W., Ohlen, D.O., and Brown, J.F.: 1991, ‘Development of a Land-Cover Characteristics Database for the Conterminous U.S.’, Photogram. Eng. Rem. Sens. 57, 1453–1463.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, T.M., Martin, M.E., Aber, J.D., Melillo, J.M., Nadelhoffer, K.J., and Dewey, B.: 1991, ‘Comparison of Wet Chemistry and Near Infrared Reflectance Measurements of Carbon-Fraction Chemistry and Nitrogen Concentration of Forest Foliage’, Can. J. For. Res. 21, 1689–1693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N.: 1991, ‘Tropical Forests: Present Status and Future Outlook’, Clim. Change 19, 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, W.M., Peng, T.-H., Emanuel, W.R., King, A.W., Dale, V.H., and DeAngelis, D.L.: 1990, ‘The Global Carbon Cycle’, Am. Scientist 78, 310–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepley, J., and Green, K.: 1991, ‘Old Growth Forest — How Much Remains?’, Geog. Info. Syst. 1, 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, J.R.G., and Justice, C.O.: 1988, ‘Selecting the Spatial Resolution of Satellite Sensors Required for Global Monitoring of Land Transformations’, Int. J. Remote Sensing 9, 187–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, J., Justice, C., Li, W., Gurney, C., and McManus, J.: 1991, ‘Global Land Cover Classification by Remote Sensing: Present Capabilities and Future Possibilities’, Remote Sens. Environ. 35, 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C.J., Townshend, J.R.G., and Goff, T.E.: 1985, ‘African Land-Cover Classification Using Satellite Data’, Science 227, 369–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C.J., Townshend, J.R.G., Goff, T.E., and Holben, B.N.: 1986, ‘Continental and Global Scale Remote Sensing of Land Cover’, In: Trabalka, J.R. and Reichle, D.E. (Eds.) The Changing Carbon Cycle: A Global Analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 221–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, K.L., Oswald, D.D., Powell, D.S.: 1989, Forest Statistics of the United States, USDA Forest Service Res. Bull., PNW-RB-168, 106 pp.

  • Wessman, C.A., Aber, J.D., Peterson, D.L., and Melillo, J.M.: 1988, ‘Remote Sensing of Canopy Chemistry and Nitrogen Cycling in Temperate Forest Ecosystems’, Nature 335, 154–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M.: 1988, ‘The Death and Rebirth of the American Forest: Clearing and Reversion in the United States, 1900–1980’, In Richards, J.F. and Tucker, R.P. (Eds.) World Deforestation in the Twentieth Century, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute (WRI): 1990, World Resources 1990–91, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 383 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, D.P., Koerper, G., Gucinski, H. et al. Monitoring global change: Comparison of forest cover estimates using remote sensing and inventory approaches. Environ Monit Assess 26, 295–305 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00547506

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00547506

Keywords

Navigation