Abstract
Normative variance functions can be used to accurately predict sampling exigencies, but such empirically derived formulae are continuous functions that can predict levels of sampling precision that cannot logically occur in discrete population samples. General formulae are presented that allow calculation of upper and lower boundary constraints on levels of sampling precision. These boundary constraints would only have a significant influence on sampling design where populations are so sparse that samples consist mainly of presence-absence data. A previously published empirical equation for the prediction of requisite sample number for the estimation of a freshwater benthos population correctly shows that using a small sampler can result in an up to 50-fold reduction in the amount of sediment processed, regardless of these constraints. A previously published empirical equation for the prediction of sampling variance, based on over 3000 sets of replicate samples of marine benthos populations, suggests that the use of small samplers over large ones requires the processing of between one-half and one-twentieth of the sediment for the same level of precision. It is concluded that discussions of sampling optimization should be based on knowledge of real sampling costs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Downing, J. A. (1979). Aggregation, transformation, and the design of benthos sampling programs. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 36: 1454–1463 [See also corrected Table 7 in: Corrections to recent publications. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sciences 37: p. 1333 (1980)]
Downing, J. A., Cyr, H. (1985). Quantitative estimation of epiphytic invertebrate populations. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sciences 42: 1570–1579
Elliott, J. M. (1971). Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Scient. Publs Freshwat. biol. Ass. 25: 1–160
Kosler, A. (1968). Distributional patterns of the eulitoral fauna near the isle of Hiddensee (Baltic Sea, Rugia). Mar. Biol. 1: 266–268
Lussenhop, J. (1974). Victor Hensen and the development of sampling methods in ecology. J. Hist. Biol. 7: 319–337
McIntyre, A. D., Elliott, J. M., Ellis, D. V. (1984). Design of sampling programmes. In: Holme, N. A., McIntyre, A. D. (eds.) Methods for the study of marine benthos. Blackwell, Oxford, p. 1–26 (IBP Handbk No. 16, 2nd ed.)
Morin, A. (1985). Variability of density estimates and the optimization of sampling programs for stream benthos. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sciences 42: 1530–1534
Omori, M., Ikeda, T. (1984). Methods in marine zooplankton ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Riddle, M. J. (1989). Precision of the mean and the design of benthos sampling programmes: caution advised. Mar. Biol. 103: 225–230
Taylor, L. R. (1984). Assessing and interpreting the spatial distributions of insect populations. A. Rev. Ent. 29: 321–357
Taylor, W. D. (1980). Comment on “Aggregation, transformations and the design of benthos sampling programs”. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sciences 37: 1328–1329
Vézina, A. F. (1988). Sampling variance and the design of quantitative surveys of the marine benthos. Mar. Biol. 97: 151–155
Wildish, D. J. (1978). Sublittoral macro-infaunal grab sampling reproducibility and cost. Tech. Rep. Fish. mar. Serv. Can. 770: 1–14
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by J. Mauchline, Oban
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Downing, J.A. Precision of the mean and the design of benthos sampling programmes: caution revised. Mar. Biol. 103, 231–234 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00543352
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00543352