Skip to main content
Log in

Activity patterns of the common vole, Microtus arvalis — Automatic recording of behaviour in an enclosure

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The activity behaviour of the common vole, Microtus arvalis was studied in an enclosure during a one-year cycle. The number of voles varied between 2 and 25 specimens. Emergence from burrows, running through pathways and visits at a feeding site were automatically recorded by passage counters which we developed for use in the field. The results can be summarized as follows:

  1. 1.

    The voles were day-active throughout the year — no change of the activity phase was observed. A significant proportion of activity at daytime was due to foraging trips to the feeding site, but the voles were active in the pathway-system, too. At night only a few short visits to the feeding site were recorded and almost no activity in the pathways was detectable.

  2. 2.

    In addition to the day-activity recorded by the passage counters we observed other activities like burrowing and storage almost exclusively at daytime, especially at dawn and dusk.

  3. 3.

    During daylight hours the voles were active on the surface in a synchronized short-term activity rhythm of about two hours.

  4. 4.

    This clear-cut activity pattern was changed for two reasons only: by juveniles beginning to venture from their burrows and by wet and cold weather conditions.

  5. 5.

    The activity pattern of voles kept in a cage within the enclosure was in accordance with previous investigations — the caged voles exhibited a distinct short-term rhythm of feeding bouts during daylight hours and showed extensive wheel-running activity at night. Thus they had maximum locomotor activity at a time, during which the voles in the enclosure were only occasionally active on the surface. Including previous results we assume from our investigations that voles are primarily day-active organisms. Although the short-term rhythm is closely related to metabolic demands there is evidence that its basic function is not to forage but to emerge for regular control of the territory. The hypothesis is put forward that short-term activity on the surface, which is synchronized with the activity of the population, might be advantageous to maintain territories. In continuation it is suggested that specimen which defend their territories effectively are most likely to survive at high densities in population cycles. Therefore the complex temporal structure of the voles' activity pattern might be favoured by selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown LE (1956) Field experiments on the activity of the small mammals Apodemus, Clethrionmys and Microtus Proc Zool Soc London 126:549–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL, Finerty JP (1980) Vole population cycles: a case for kin-selection? Oecologia (Berl) 45:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Daan S, Aschoff J (1980) Short term rhythms in activity. In: J. Aschoff (ed.) Handbook of Behavioural Neurobiology, Vol 5 Biological Rhythms (in press)

  • Daan S, Slopsema S (1978) Short-term rhythms in foraging behaviour of the common vole, Microtus arvalis J comp Physiol 127:215–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkinaro E (1969) Der Phasenwechsel der lokomotorischen Aktivität bei Microtus agrestis (L), M arvalis (Pall) and M oeconomus (Pall) Aquilo (Ser Zool) 8:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkinaro E (1973) Short-term rhythm of locomotor activity within the 24-h-period in the Norwegian lemming, Lemmus lemmus, and water vole, Arvicola terrestris. Aquilo (Ser Zool) 14:46–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank F (1954) Beiträge zur Biologie der Feldmaus, Microtus arvalis (Pallas). Teil I: Gehegeversuche Zool Jb (Syst) 82:354–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WJ (1937) Activity and home range of the field mouse, Microtus pennysylvanicus. Ecology 18:255–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield DM (1935) A natural history study of Microtus californicus. J Mammal 16:261–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenagy GJ (1976) The periodicity of daily activity and its seasonal changes in free-ranging and captive kangaroo rats. Oecologia (Berl) 24:105–140

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKock LL, Rohn I (1971) Observations on the use of the exercise-wheel in relation to the social rank and hormonal conditions in the Bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus), and the Norway lemming (Lemmus lemmus). Z Tierpsychol 29:180–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann U (1976a) Short-term and circadian rhythms in the behaviour of the vole, Microtus agrestis (L.). Oecologia (Berl) 23:185–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann U (1976b) Stochastic principles in the temporal control of activity behaviour. Int J Chronobiol 4:223–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossing T (1975) Measuring small locomotory activity with passage — counters. Oikos 26:237–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostermann K (1956) Zur Aktivität heimischer Muriden und Gliriden. Zool Jb (Physiol) 66:355–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommersberg CW (1979) Gehege- und Freilanduntersuchungen zum tagesperiodischen Verhalten der Feldmaus (Microtus arvalis P). Staatsexamensarbeit Universität zu Köln

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehmann, U., Sommersberg, C.W. Activity patterns of the common vole, Microtus arvalis — Automatic recording of behaviour in an enclosure. Oecologia 47, 61–75 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00541777

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00541777

Keywords

Navigation