Summary
Yeasts cells (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) were immobilized by occlusion in pectin gel, no significant changes in their biological activity being observed. The ethanol production rate was found to be negatively affected by the diameter of the beads when the cell concentration in them was high. The fermentative activity was only slightly modified by pectin concentration. Cells maintained their growth capacity and the beads could be reutilized several times in succesive batch fermentations. After freeze-drying and storage at room temperature the beads retained both their morphological and mechanical characteristics as well as 93% of their initial fermentative activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbot BJ (1977) Immobilized cells. In: Perlman D (ed) Annual reports on fermentation processes, vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 205–233
Dubowski KM (1961) An o-toluidine method for body fluid glucose determination. 13th Annual Meeting of the American Association Clinical Chemistry, New York
Gulaya VE, Turková J, Jirku V, Frydrychová A, Coupek J, Ananchenko SN (1979) Immobilization of yeast cells onto hydroxyalkyl methacrylate gels modified by spacers of different lengths. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 8:43–47
Jack TR, Zajic JE (1977) The immobilization of whole cells. Adv Biochem Eng 5:125–145
Kolot FB (1980) New trends in yeast technology-immobilized cells. Process Biochem 15:2–8
Ohlson S, Larsson PO, Mosbach K (1979) Steroid transformation by living cells immobilized in calcium alginate. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 7:103–110
Towle GA, Christensen O (1973) Pectin. In: Whistler RC (ed). Industrial gums, 2nd ed. Academic Press, USA, p 447
Williams D, Munnecke DM (1981) The production of ethanol by immobilized yeast cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 23:1813–1825
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Navarro, A.R., Rubio, M.C. & Callieri, D.A.S. Production of ethanol by yeasts immobilized in pectin. European J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17, 148–151 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00505879
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00505879