Summary
Mutants of Saccharomyces uvarum, 5D-cyc with increased tolerance to ethanol have been isolated by a continuous selection technique which allows the culture itself to determine the intensity of selection via a feedback control circuit. The output of CO2 from a continuous culture of the yeast was monitored using an infrared analyser and the signal from that analyser fed to a potentiometric controller which regulated the introduction of a concentrated ethanol solution into the culture vessel. The frequency of ethanol addition to the culture thus increased as the tolerance of the organisms improved.
The use of this system permitted the selection of mutants of yeast which were viable in the presence of 12% w/v ethanol and which showed higher fermentation rates (as measured by CO2 production) than the wild-type in the presence of 10% w/v ethanol and above. The technique of continuous selection with feedback should be generally applicable to the isolation of mutants of any microorganism to improved tolerance to any inhibitory condition of either its physical or chemical environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown SW, Oliver SG, Harrison DEF, Righelato RC (1981) Ethanol inhibition of yeast growth and fermentation: Differences in the magnitude and complexity of the effect. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 11:151–155
Ismail AA, Ali AMM (1971) Selection of high ethanol-yielding Saccharomyces I. Ethanol tolerance and the effect of training in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hansen. Folia Microbiol 16:346–349
Ismail AA, Ali AMM (1971) Selection of high ethanol-yielding Saccharomyces II. Genetics of ethanol tolerance. Folia Microbiol 16:350–354
Von Meyenberg HK (1969) Energetics of the budding cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during glucose limited aerobic growth. Arch Mikrobiol 66:289–303
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, S.W., Oliver, S.G. Isolation of ethanol-tolerant mutants of yeast by continuous selection. European J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16, 119–122 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00500738
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00500738