Summary
Isolated hepatocytes prepared from rats pretreated with diethylnitrosamine (0.5 mg/kg DENA/day p.o.) are less sensitive to phalloidin poisoning. They take up lower amounts of both phallotoxins and bile acids than controls. The degree of inhibition depends on the period of pretreatment.
References
Agostini, B., Hofmann, W.: Morphology of phalloidin intoxication. In: Membrane alterations as basis of liver injury (H. Popper, L. Bianchi, W. Reutter, eds.), pp. 277–292. Lancaster, U.K.: MTP Press Ltd. 1977
Agostini, B., Wieland, Th., Ivankovic, S., Hofmann, W.: Phalloidin tolerance in rats with liver carcinoma induced by diethylnitrosamine. Naturwissenschaften 63, 438 (1976)
Agostini, B., Ivankovic, S., Hofmann, W.: Different response to phalloidin in rats with various hepatomas. Naturwissenschaften 64, 650 (1977)
Grundmann, E., Petzinger, E., Frimmer, M., Boschek, C.B.: A possible reason for the phalloidin tolerance of hepatoma cells. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 305, 253–259 (1978)
Kroker, R., Anwer, M.S., Hegner, D.: The lack of active bile acid transport in AS-30D ascites hepatoma cells. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 303, 299–301 (1978)
Petzinger, E., Ziegler, K., Frimmer, M.: Inhibition of 3H-Demethylphalloin uptake in isolated rat hepatocytes under various experimental conditions. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 307, 275–281 (1979)
Ziegler, K., Petzinger, E., Grundmann, E., Frimmer, M.: Decreased sensitivity of isolated hepatocytes from baby rats, from regenerating and from poisoning livers to phalloidin. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 306, 295–300 (1979)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ziegler, K., Petzinger, E. & Frimmer, M. Decreased phalloidin response, phallotoxin uptake and bile acid transport in hepatocytes prepared from wistar rats treated chronically with diethylnitrosamine. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 310, 245–247 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00499918
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00499918