Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cytophotometric evidence of variation in genome size of desmognathine salamanders

  • Published:
Histochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The amount of DNA per haploid genome, the C-value, is often directly correlated with nuclear and cell volume, but inversely correlated with cell replication rate. Also, rates of cellular growth sometimes appear to be correlated with organismal developmental rates and life history patterns. Among vertebrates, salamanders exhibit the greatest variation in genome size. In the present study we have examined interspecific and intraspecific variation in blood cell DNA levels in the genus Desmognathus, which shows greater variation in life history traits than any other salamander genus. Specimens of Desmognathus quadramaculatus, D. Monticola, D. ochrophaeus and D. wrighti were collected from nature at two localities in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Estimates of genome size in pg of DNA were obtained from blood smears by DNA-Feulgen cytophotometry, using erythrocyte nuclei of Xenopus laevis as an internal reference standard of 6.35 pg DNA per cell. C-values of Desmognathus are the smallest in the order Caudata. Although significant variation in DNA levels was found among the four species, the differences were small, and do not support previously proposed relationships between C-value and life-history variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison DC, Ridolpho PF, Rasch EM, Rasch RW, Johnson TS (1981) Increased accuracy of absorption cytophotometric DNA values by control of stain intensity. J Histochem Cytochem 29:1219–1228

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann K (1968) A cytochemical kinetic investigation of the Feulgen hydrolysis of fixed chromatin. Histochemie 16:287–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann K (1970) Feulgen slope determinations of urodele nuclear DNA amounts. Histochemie 22:289–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann K, Goin OB, Goin CJ (1972) Nuclear DNA amounts in vertebrates. In: Smith HH (ed) Evolution of genetic systems. Gordon and Breach, New York, pp 419–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan HG (1967) The organization of genetic units in chromosomes. J Cell Sci 2:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith T (1978) Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the C-value paradox. J Cell Sci 34:217–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith T (1980) r- and K-tactics in the evolution of protist developmental systems: cell and genome size, phenotype diversifying selection, and cell cycle patterns. Bio Systems 12:43–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith T (1982) Skeletal DNA and the evolution of genome size. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 11:273–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith T (1985a) Eukaryote gene numbers, non-coding DNA and genome size. In: Cavalier-Smith T (ed) The evolution of genome size. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 69–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith T (1985b) Cell volume and the evolution of eukaryotic genome size. In: Cavalier-Smith T (ed) The evolution of genome size. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 105–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawid IB (1965) Deoxyribonucleic acid in amphibian eggs. J Mol Biol 12:581–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle WF, Sapienza C (1980) Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature 284:601–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans GM, Rees H, Snell CL, Sun S (1972) Relationship between nuclear DNA amount and the duration of the mitotic cycle. Chromosomes Today 3:24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall JG (1981) Chromosome structure and the C-value paradox. J Cell Biol 91:3s-14s

    Google Scholar 

  • Goin OB, Goin CJ, Bachmann K (1968) DNA and amphibian life history. Copeia 1968:532–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso JA, Woodard JW (1967) DNA synthesis and mitosis in erythropoietic cells. J Cell Biol 33:645–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey DA (1982) Selfish DNA: a sexually transmitted nuclear parasite. Genetics 101:519–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Tukey JW (1985) Exploring data tables, trends, and shapes. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p 527

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner HA, Macgregor HC (1983) C-value and cell volume: their significance in the evolution and development of amphibians. J Cell Sci 63:135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezer J, Sessions SK (1979) Chromosome variation in the plethodontid salamander, Aneides ferreus. Chromosoma 71:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemann SW (1982) Single copy DNA sequence evolution and genome organization in the genus Desmognathus (Amphibia: Urodela: Plethodontidae). Ph.D. Dissertation, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, p 129

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson A (1984) Neohtological inferences of evolutionary pattern and process in the salamander family Plethodontidae. In: Hecht MK, Wallace B, Prance GT (eds) Evolutionary biology, vol 17. Plenum Press, New York, pp 119–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessler MA (1953) The nature and specificity of the Feulgen nucleal reaction. Int Rev Cytol 2:231–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin B (1974) Gene expression, vol 2. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 467

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, p 203

    Google Scholar 

  • Macgregor HC (1984) The evolutionary consequences of major genomic changes in Amphibia. In: Bennett MD, Gropp A, Wolf U (eds) Chromosomes today, vol 8. George Allen and Unwin, London, pp 256–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuno S, Macgregor HC (1974) Chromosomes, DNA sequences and evolution in salamanders of the genus Plethodon. Chromosoma 48:239–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore GP (1984) The C-value paradox. Bio Science 34:425–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Morescalchi A (1975) Chromosome evolution in the caudate Amphibia. In: Dobzhansky T, Hecht MK, Steere WC (eds) Evolutionary biology, vol 8. Plenum Press, New York, pp 339–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmo E (1973) Quantitative variations in the nuclear DNA and phylogenesis of the Amphibia. Caryologia 26:43–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmo E (1974) Further data on the genome size in the urodeles. J Bool Zool 41:29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmo E (1983) Nucleotype and cell size in vertebrates: a review. Basic Appl Histochem 27:227–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmo E (1984) Genomic composition of reptiles: evolutionary perspectives. J Herpet 18:20–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmo E, Morescalchi A (1975) Evolution of the genome and cell sizes in salamanders. Experientia 31:804–806

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmo E, Morescalchi A (1978) Genome and cell sizes in frogs: a comparison with salamanders. Experientia 34:44–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ JA (1961) Studies of the local distribution, life history, and population dynamics of the salamander genus Desmognathus in Virginia. Ecol Monog 31:189–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Orgel LE, Crick FHC (1980) Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature 284:604–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch EM (1974) The DNA content of sperm and hemocyte nuclei of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Chromosoma 45:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch EM (1985) DNA “standards” and the range of accurate DNA estimates by Feulgen absorption microspectrophotometry. In: Cowden RR, Harrison FW (eds) Advances in microscopy. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 137–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessions SK (1985) Cytogenetics and evolution of salamanders. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuter BJ, Thomas JE, Taylor WD, Zimmerman AM (1983) Phenotypic correlates of genomic DNA content in unicellular eukaryotes and other cells. Am Nat 122:26–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. WH Freeman, San Francisco, p 859

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiebaud CH, Fischberg M (1977) DNA content in the genus Xenopus. Chromosoma 59:253–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CA Jr (1971) The genetic organization of chromosomes. Annu Rev Genet 5:237–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley SG (1968) Size-fecundity relationships and their evolutionary implications in five desmognathine salamanders. Evolution 22:806–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley SG (1973) Life histories and natural selection in populations of the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Ecology 54:3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley SG (1980) Life histories and comparative demography of two salamander populations. Copeia 1980:806–821

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Western Carolina University, 28723, Cullowhee, North Carolina, USA

    M. K. Hally, H. R. Mainwaring & R. C. Bruce

  2. Department of Biophysics, East Tennessee State University, 37601, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA

    E. M. Rasch

Authors
  1. M. K. Hally
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. M. Rasch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. R. Mainwaring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. C. Bruce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hally, M.K., Rasch, E.M., Mainwaring, H.R. et al. Cytophotometric evidence of variation in genome size of desmognathine salamanders. Histochemistry 85, 185–192 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00494802

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00494802

Keywords

Search

Navigation