Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the sensitivity of the indirect, antibody-conjugated and the triple-bridge immunoperoxidase methods for immunohistochemical detection of carcinoembryonic antigen

  • Published:
Histochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A comparison between two immunoperoxidase staining procedures, a triple-bridge and an indirect, antibody-conjugated method, was made to determine the relative sensitivity of each technique in the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in routine tissue sections. The enzyme-antibody conjugates for the indirect procedure were prepared according to the method of Nakane and Kawaoi (1974). The indirect, antibody-conjugated method, proved to be slightly more sensitive than the triple-bridge by two criteria. First, CEA could be localized using higher dilutions of the primary antiserum by the indirect technique, and secondly, tissues were shown to stain for CEA in specimens with lower tissue CEA levels by the indirect procedure than by the triple-bridge method. The preparation of enzyme-antibody conjugates is a relatively simple procedure and, in addition, the conjugates will remain stable when kept frozen or at 4°C. Background staining due to non-specific interaction of the conjugate with the tissue can be eliminated easily by incubation with normal serum. These results indicate that the indirect, antibody-conjugated method can be used to enhance the staining of CEA in routine tissue sections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burns J (1975) Background staining and sensitivity of the unlabelled antibody enzyme (PAP) method. Comparison with the peroxidase labeled antibody sandwich method using formalin-fixed paraffin embedded material. Histochemistry 43:291–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg DM, Sharkey RM, Primus FJ (1976) Carcinoembryonic antigen in histopathology: Immunoperoxidase staining of conventional tissue sections. J Natl Cancer Inst 57:11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyderman E, Neville M (1977) A shorter immunoperoxidase technique for the demonstration of the carcinoembryonic antigen and other cell products. J Clin Pathol 30:138–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason TE, Phifer RF, Spicer SS, Swallow RA, Dreskin RB (1969) An Immunoglobulin-enzyme bridge method for localizing tissue antigens. J Histochem Cytochem 17:563–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakane PK, Pierce GB Jr (1966) Enzyme-labelled antibodies: Preparation and application for the localization of antigens. J Histochem Cytochem 14:920–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakane PK, Pierce GB Jr (1967) Enzyme-labeled antibody for the light and electron microscopic localization of tissue antigens. J Cell Biol 33:307–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakane PH, Kawaoi A (1974) Peroxidase-labeled antibody. A new method of conjugation. J Histochem Cytochem 22:1084–1091

    Google Scholar 

  • Primus FJ, Wang RH, Sharkey RM, Goldenberg DM (1975) Detection of the carcinoembryonic antigen in tissue sections by immunoperoxidase. J Immunol Methods 8:267–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Primus FJ, Newman ES, Hansen HJ (1977) Affinity in radioimmunoassay of antibody cross-reactive with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and colon carcinoma antigen-III (CCA-III) J Immunol 118:55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Primus FJ, Sharkey RM, Hansen HJ, Goldenberg DM (1978) Immunoperoxidase detection of carcinoembryonic antigen: An overview. Cancer 42:1540–1545

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberger LA, Hardy PH Jr, Cuculis JJ, Meyer HG (1970) The unlabeled antibody enzyme method for immunohistochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem 18:315–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberger LA (1974) Immunocytochemistry. Pentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus W (1976) First International symposium on Immunoenzymatic Techniques. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • van Nagell JR Jr, Donaldson ES, Gay EC, Sharkey RM, Rayburn P, Goldenberg DM (1978) Carcinoembryonic antigen in ovarian epithelial cystadenocarcinomas. Cancer 41:2335–2340

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagener C, Csazar H, Totovic V, Breuer H (1978) A highly sensitive method for the demonstration of carcinoembryonic antigen in normal and neoplastic colonic tissue. Histochemistry 58:1–11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by NIH contract NCI-NO1-CB-84257

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharkey, R.M., Primus, F.J. & Goldenberg, D.M. Comparison of the sensitivity of the indirect, antibody-conjugated and the triple-bridge immunoperoxidase methods for immunohistochemical detection of carcinoembryonic antigen. Histochemistry 66, 35–42 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00493243

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00493243

Keywords

Navigation