Abstract
The awareness of the effects of transboundary pollution has increased the necessity to use comparable methods and to initiate joint studies between countries in environmental monitoring. In freshwater fish monitoring a number of different methods have been used, strongly reducing the possibilities to comparative assessments between countries. In 1990, a workshop on freshwater fish sampling was initiated in order to develop and intercalibrate methods used in freshwater fish studies in the Nordic countries. During a three year period, a new type of multi-mesh gillnet to be used for fish monitoring in Norway, Finland and Sweden have been developed. Comparative studies and gillnet-selectivity assessments show that these new multi-mesh gillnets better describe the actual population structure of European perch (Perca fluviatilis), roach (Rutilus rutilus) and Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) than do the traditional gillnet series used in the Nordic countries. Ageing of fish is central in most environmental studies, however, the comparability of analyses performed at different laboratories may be low. Comparative age analyses between the three countries have been performed for a number of fish species. The results of ageing E. perch, whitefish (Coregonus sp.) and roach indicate that differences between laboratories can be reduced by intercalibration. In the future, the workgroup will be focused on a further development of joint methods within studies of freshwater fish and on joint intemordic assessments on species distribution, abundance and life history characteristics in relation to airborne pollutants and liming.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appelberg, M., Degerman, E. and Nyberg, P.: 1989, British Library, Science Reference and Information Service. 1989, 143–165.
Beamish, R. J. and McFarlane, G. A.: 1983, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 112:735–743.
Beamish, R. J. and McFarlane, G. A.: 1987, Paper presented at the International Symposium on Age and Growth of Fish, Des Moines IOWA, June 9–12, 1985. Iowa State University Press/AMES, 15–42.
Degerman, E., Nyberg, P. and Appelberg, M.: 1988, Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 64, 91–100.
Gulland, J. A., Harding, D.: 1961, J. Cons. ht. Explor. Mer. 26, 215–222.
Helser, T. E., Condrey, R. E. and Geaghan, J. P.: 1991, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48, 487–492.
Jensen, J. W.: 1986, J. Fish. Bid. 28, 637–646.
Kleiven, E.: 1995, Nordic Journal of Fresh water Research (submitted).
Rask, M., Maimio, J. Forsius, M. Posch, M. and Vuorinen, P. J.: 1995, Environ. Biol. of Fishes 42, 51–63.
Regier, H. A. and Robson, D. S.: 1966, J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 23, 423–454.
Rosseland, B. O., Sevaldrud, I. H., Svalaskog, D. and Muniz, I. P: 1980, Ecological impact of Acid Precipitation, SNSF- Project.Oslo-Ås. 336–337.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Appelberg, M., Berger, H.M., Hesthagen, T. et al. Development and intercalibration of methods in nordic freshwater fish monitoring. Water Air Soil Pollut 85, 401–406 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00476862
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00476862