Summary
Most empirical methods of subsidence prediction are based on the prior knowledge of the maximum possible subsidence, Smax, for a particular coalfield. The subsidence profile and other associated parameters along a desired line may be derived, in most cases, as a function of S max. These methods are site specific and are not based upon the rational concepts of mechanics. Purely mechanistic methods, on the other hand, could not find wide application because of their limitations in representing the complex behaviour of a rockmass.
Therefore a semi-empirical method of calculation of S max or S, which is an improvement over the empirical method reported elsewhere (Bahuguna et al., 1991a), has been derived from combining the mechanistic and empirical approach. The effects of various parameters are studied by numerical modelling. These qualitative results are then used to influence the development of a more general semiempirical method. The method has been tested for 125 coal mine workings in India and 22 mines of the North Appalachian basin. The method is easily adaptable to other countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bahuguna, P.P., Singh, B., Srivastava, A.M.C. and Saxena, N.C. (1991a) An empirical method for calculation of maximum subsidence, In Rock Mechanics as a Multi Disciplinary Science, J.C. Roegiers (ed.), Proceedings of the 32nd US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Oklahoma, July 1991, pp. 801–9.
Bahuguna, P.P., Srivastava, A.M.C. and Saxena, N.C. (1991b) A critical review of mine subsidence prediction methods, Mineral Science Technology, 13, 369–82.
Beckett, L.A. and Madrid, R.S. (1988) mulsim/bm—A structural analysis computer program for mine design, Information Circular 9168, US Bureau of Mines, p. 302.
Crouch, S.L. (1976) Analysis of stresses and displacements around underground excavations: an application of the displacement discontinuity method. Geomechanics Report to the National Science Foundation, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota, p. 267.
McNabb, K.E. (1987) Three-dimensional numerical modelling of surface subsidence induced by underground mining, Technical Report No. 146, Division of Geomechanics, CSIRO, Australia, p. 20.
Saxena, N.C. (1989) Working paper, Central Mining Research Station, Dhanbad, India, 1989.
Sheorey, P.R. (1989) Personal communication, 1989.
Singh, B. (1973) Continuum characterisation of jointed rock masses. II. Significance of low shear modulus, International Journal of Rock Mechanics, Mining Science and Geomechanics, 10 (4), 337–49 (abstract).
Sinha, K.P. (1979) Displacement discontinuity technique for analysing stresses and displacements due to mining in seam deposits. PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota, p. 311.
Tandanand, S. and Powell, L.R. (1984) Influence of lithology on longwall mining subsidence, Mining Engineering, 36 (12), 1666–71.
TsurLavie, Y., Denekamp, S.A. and Fainstein, G. (1984) Geometry of subsidence associated with longwall mining, In Ground Movements and Structures, J.D. Geddes (ed), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference at University of Wales, Institute of Science & Technology, Vol. 3, Cardiff, July 1984, pp. 324–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bahuguna, P.P., Singh, B., Srivastava, A.M.C. et al. Semi-empirical method for calculation of maximum subsidence in coal mines. Geotech Geol Eng 11, 249–261 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00466367
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00466367