Skip to main content
Log in

Auditory frequency selectivity and tinnitus

  • Published:
Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In the majority of cases tinnitus has a high pitch and can be matched rather precisely to an objective high frequency sound. However, it is well known that tinnitus can be masked by different tones without any frequency selectivity. We wondered whether objective tones matched to tinnitus would show a more significant deterioration of frequency selectivity than could be expected from any associated hearing loss. Psychoacoustic tuning curves were obtained using simultaneous pure-tone masking and revealed a broadening of frequency selectivity. In cases of comparable bilateral hearing losses with unilateral tinnitus, the broadening associated with the tinnitus was particularly conspicuous. This broadening strongly suggests that tinnitus originates in the cochlea, although some involvement of central pathways may also occur. Tinnitus-induced broadening of frequency selectivity as a possible sign of cochlear origin deserves further consideration in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cazals Y, Bourdin M (1983) Etude acoustique des acouphènes. Rev Laryngol 104:433–438

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cazals Y, Li XQ, Aurousseau C, Didier A (1988) Acute effects of noradrenalin related vasoactive agents on the ototoxicity of aspirin: an experimental study in the guinea pig. Hear Res 36:89–96

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dauman R, Cazals Y, Aran JM (1988) Frequency selectivity: reliability of electrocochleographic measures with isointensity masking. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 105:50–55

    Google Scholar 

  4. Douek E (1987) Tinnitus following surgery. In: Feldmann H (ed) Proceedings of the Third International Tinnitus Seminar, Münster 1987. Harsch Verlag, Karlsruhe, pp 64–69

    Google Scholar 

  5. Douek E, Reid J (1968) The diagnostic value of tinnitus pitch. J Laryngol Otol 82:1039–1041

    Google Scholar 

  6. Evans EF, Borerwe TA (1982) Ototoxic effects of salycilates on the responses of single cochlear nerve fibers and on cochlear potentials. Br J Audiol 16:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feldmann H (1971) Homolateral and contralateral masking of tinnitus by noise-bands and by pure-tones. Audiol 10:138–144

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feldmann H (1988) Pathophysiology of tinnitus. In: Kitahara M (ed) Tinnitus: pathophysiology and management. IgakuShoin, Tokyo, pp 7–35

    Google Scholar 

  9. Florentine M, Buus S, Sharf B, Zwicker E (1980) Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Speech Hear Res 23:646–669

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hawkins JE Jr (1979) Ototoxicity. In: Maran AG, Stell PM (eds) Clinical otolaryngology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 92–9911

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kiang NYS, Liberman MCh, Sewell WF, Guinan JJ (1984) Single unit clues to cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 22:171–182

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller MH, Jakinetz JR (1984) Noise exposure, hearing loss, speech discrimination and tinnitus. J Laryngol Otol [Suppl] 9:74–76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mongan E, Kelly P, Nies K, Porter WW, Paulus HF (1973) Tinnitus as an indicator of therapeutic serum salicylate levels. JAMA 226:142–145

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sasaki CT, Kauer JS, Babitz L (1980) Differential [14C] 2 Deoxyglucose uptake after deafferentation of the mammalian auditory pathway — a model for examining tinnitus. Brain Res 194:511–516

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spoendlin H (1987) Inner ear pathology and tinnitus. In: Feldmann H (ed) Proceedings of the Third International Tinnitus Seminar, Münster 1987. Harsch Verlag, Karlsruhe, pp 42–51

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stelmachowicz PG, Jesteadt W (1984) Psychophysical tuning curves in normal-hearing listeners: test reliability and probe level effects. J Speech Hear Res 27:396–402

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tyler RS, Conrad-Armes D (1984) Masking of tinnitus compared to masking of pure tones. J Speech Hear Res 27:106–111

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vernon J (1988) Measurement of tinnitus: an update. In: Kitahara M (ed) Tinnitus: pathophysiology and management. Igaku-Shoin, Tokyo, pp 36–52

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wightman FL, McGee T, Kramer M (1977) Factors influencing frequency selectivity in normal and hearing impaired listeners. In: Evans E, Wilson JP (eds) Psychophysics and physiology of hearing. Academic Press, London, pp 295–306

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zwicker E (1974) On a psychoacoustical equivalent of tuning curves. In: Zwicker E, Terhardt (eds) Facts and models of hearing. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 132–141

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zwicker E (1987) Masking in normal ears — psychoacoustical facts and physiological correlates. In: Feldmann H (ed) Proceedings of the Third International Tinnitus Seminar, Münster 1987. Harsch Verlag, Karlsruhe, pp 214–223

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dauman, R., Cazals, Y. Auditory frequency selectivity and tinnitus. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 246, 252–255 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00463566

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00463566

Key words

Navigation