Abstract
Significance testing, parameter estimation and sensitivity calculations for γ-ray telescopes are discussed for single ‘on-off” astronomical observations. Four widely used significance test methods are examined by Monte-Carlo simulations. The Maximum Likelihood Ratio Method is found to consistently over-estimate the significance of an observation by a few percents whereas the Fisher's Exact Test is shown to be slightly conservative and always under-estimates the significance by about the same amount when the reported significance is about 3σ and therefore it is preferred for γ-ray astronomy applications. Two methods for constructing a confidence interval and an upper limit for γ-ray source counts are discussed. It is found that the method based on the Smooth Transformation provides slightly better estimations. A new formula for the calculation of the sensitivity of a γ-ray telescope is presented, in contrast to the widely accepted one, and their statistical meanings are explained in detail.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AnscombeF.J. (1948) Biometrika, 35, 246–254
BestD.J. (1975) Austral. J. Statist., 17(1), 29–33
BickelJ.P., DoksumK.A. (1977) Mathematical Statistics: Basic Ideas and Selected Topics, pp228, San Francisco: Holden-Day
BrownleeK.A. (1965) Statistical Theory and Methodology in Science and Engineering (Second Edition), New York: John Wiley & Sons
CherryM.L., ChuppE.L., DunphyP.P., ForrestD.J., RyanJ.M. (1980) The Astrophysical Journal, 242, 1257–1265
D'AgostinoR.B., ChaseW., BelangerA. (1988) The American Statistician, 42(3), 198–202
DetreK., WhiteC. (1970) Biometrics, 26, 851–854
DowthwaiteJ.C., GibsonA.I., HarrisonA.B., KirkmanI.W., LottsA.P., MacraeJ.H., OrfordK.J., TurverK.E., WalmsleyM. (1983) Astron. Astrophys., 126, 1–6
HastingsN.A., PeacockJ.B. (1975) Statistical Distributions, London: Butterworths
HearnD. (1969) Nucl. Instr. Methods, 70, 200
HillierR. (1984) Gamma-Ray Astronomy, p50, Oxford: Clarendon Press
HoelP.G. (1945) Ann. Math. Statist., 16, 362–368
HuffmanM.D. (1984) Applied Statistics, 33, 224–226
HuffmanM.D. (1985) Comm. Statist.-Theor. Meth., 14(12), 3063–3074
LehmannE.L. (1959) Testing Statistical Hypotheses, New York: Wiley
LiT.P., MaY.Q. (1983) The Astrophysical Journal, 272, 317–324
NagleD.E., GaisserT.K., ProthereoR.J. (1988) Ann. Rev. Part. Sci., 38, 609–657
O'MongainE. (1973) Nature, 241, 376
PrzyborowskiJ., WilenskiH. (1940) Biometrika, 31, 313–323
ShiueW.K., BainL.J. (1982) Appl. Statist., 31(2), 130–134
SichelH.S. (1973) Appl. Statist., 22, 50–58
Staubert, R. (1985) Proceed. 19th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., San Diego paper OG 9.5-10, 437
TocherK.D. (1950) Biometrika, 38, 130–144
UptonG.J.G. (1982) Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A, 145, 86–105
Wheaton, W.A., Jacobson, A.S., Ling, J.C., Mahoney, W.A. (1987) Contribution to the Workshop on Nuclear Spectroscopy of Astrophysical Sources, JPL Astrophysics Preprint, No. 88-171
Zhang, S.N., Ramsden, D., Lloyds-Evans, J. (1989) Submitted to Experimental Astronomy
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, S.N., Ramsden, D. Statistical data analysis for gamma-ray astronomy. Exp Astron 1, 145–163 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00462037
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00462037