Skip to main content
Log in

Electrophysiological evaluation of chloroform-induced inner ear damage

  • Published:
Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Local placement of chloroform in either the external or the middle ear has been previously reported to induce a chemical labyrinthectomy. In order to examine the value of this effect as a research tool, we injected chloroform into the middle ears of guinea pigs and rats. Cochlear damage was assessed by electrocochleography (ECochG) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) audiometry. Both species developed complete deafness within a few hours after instillation of the chloroform. The deafness was permanent in the guinea pigs, whereas there was a partial recovery of auditory function in the rats. The survival rate of the auditory nerve fibers was estimated by measuring the ABR evoked by electrical stimulation via the scala tympani (EABR). A normal EABR recruitment pattern suggested that the main chloroform effect was located peripheral to the afferent axons. In conclusion, chloroform must be considered a severely ototoxic agent when applied locally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown-Sequard M (1881) Nouveaux faits relatifs a l'action du chloroforme applique a la peripherie du systeme nerveux (peau et conduit auditif externe). C R Seances Soc Biol 32:383–384

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis H (1976) Principles of electrical responses audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 85:28

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liberman CM, Simmons DD (1985) Applications of neuronal labeling techniques to the study of the peripheral auditory system. JASA 78:212–319

    Google Scholar 

  4. Noel F, Schwarz DWF, Hu K (1986) A procedure of vestibular decompensation for clinical diagnosis. 1. Animal experiments. J Otolaryngol 15:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schaefer KB, Meyer DL (1974) Compensation of vestibular lesions. In: Kornhuber HH (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VI/2. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 463–492

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schwarz DWF (1986) Physiology of the vestibular system. In: Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM, Harker LA, Krause CJ, Schuller DE (eds) Otolaryngology — head and neck surgery, vol IV. Mosby, St Louis, pp 2679–2721

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith L, Simmons FB (1983) Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 92:19–23

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Honert C, Stypulskowski PH (1983) Evidence of two spike initiation sites on the electrically stimulated nerve in cat. Abstracts of the 6th ARO Midwinter Meeting, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St Petersburg Beach, Fla, p 27

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Hu Ke is on academic leave from the Department of Otolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.

Supported by Pacific Otolaryngology Foundation and Medical Research Council, Canada

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, K., Schwarz, D.W.F. Electrophysiological evaluation of chloroform-induced inner ear damage. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 244, 222–228 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00455310

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00455310

Key words

Navigation