Summary
Cytology of the laryngeal mucosa proved to be a suitable method for diagnosing low-grade and intermediate dysplasia, but it did not allow any distinction between high-grade dysplasia and invasive cancer. In our experience, the use of this method should be restricted to a few conditions, such as the persistance of recurrent dysplasias and certain extended lesions from which biopsies give a high risk for scarring and permanent hoarseness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bichler E, Spöndlin H (1979) Behandlung von Larynxpachydermien mit aromatischem Retinoid (Ro 10-9359). Arch Otorhinolaryngol 225: 9–14
Bichler E, Rauchegger H (1982) Behandlung von Larynxpachydermien mit aromatischem Retinoid (Ro 10-9359). Weitere Ergebnisse. HNO 30: 290–292
Franz B, Neumann OG (1978) Leukoplakien des Kehlkopfes. Histologisch-zytologische Klassifizierung. Laryngol Rhinol 57: 428–433
Franz B, Wetzel M (1980) Zytologie des frühinvasiven Larynxcarcinomes. Laryngol Rhinol 59: 401–405
Kleinsasser O (1968) Mikrolaryngoskopie und endolaryngeale Mikrochirurgie. Schattauer, Stuttgart New York
Lehmann W, Pidoux JM, Widmann JJ (1981) Larynx. In: Franceschinis R, Lualdi P (eds) Microlaryngoscopy and histopathology. Inpharzam Medical Publications, Cadempino, Switzerland
Koss LG (1968) Diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases. Lippicott, Philadelphia
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bichler, E., Mikuz, G. & Zingerle, N. A comment on laryngeal cytology. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 241, 209–211 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00454356
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00454356