Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative experimental study on nerve repair

  • Published:
Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In order to overcome the disadvantages of the classic epior perineural nerve suture techniques, attempts have been made to secure nerve endings by a variety of measures, as exemplified by the use of artificial and biological glues. The use of a fibrinogenthrombin adhesive to seal nerve endings is an easy, time-saving method at surgery and provides excellent coaptation of the severed nerve fascicles with minimal iatrogenic trauma. However, the problem remains of excessive connective tissue proliferation at the junction site or of premature loss of tensile strenght before proper nerve healing occurs. The combination of the biological glue with the tubulization technique, associated with a fascicular and/or interfascicular nerve junction, may overcome the disadvantages associated with previous nerve repairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beck E, Ducken F, Vogel A, Ernst M (1962) Der Einfluß des Fibrinstabilisierenden Faktors (FSF) auf Funktion und Morphologie von Fibroblasten in vitro. Z Zellforsch 57:327–346

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker CM, Gueuning CO, Graff GL (1984) Sutures of fibrin glue for divided rat nerves. J Reconst Microsurg 1:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berger A, Meissl G, Samii M (1970) Experimentelle Erfahrungen mit Kollagenfolien über nahtlose Nerven Anastomosen. Acta Neurochir 23:141–149

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boedts D, Bouckaert JI (1985) Nerve anastomosis: suturing and sealing. In: Portmann M (ed) Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Facial Nerve, Bordeaux, 1984. Masson, New York, pp 523–526

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bruhn HD, Christophers E, Pohl J, Schoel G (1980) Regulation der Fibroblastenproliferation durch Fibrinogen (Fibrin, Fibronectin und Faktor XIII). In: Schimpf K (ed) Fibrinogen, Fibrin und Fibrinkleber. Schattauer, Stuttgart New York, pp 217–226

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chiu D, Janecka IP, Krizet T (1980) Autogenous vein graft as a conduit for nerve regeneration. Surg Forum 31:550–551

    Google Scholar 

  7. Colin W, Donoff RB (1984) Nerve regeneration through collagen tube. J Dent Res 63:987–993

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duspiva W, Blümel G, Haas-Denk S, Wriedt-Lübbe I (1977) Eine neue Methode der Anastomosierung durchtrennter peripherer Nerven. Langenbecks Arch Chir [Suppl] 289:100–104

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fisch U (1972) Die Verletzungen der Nervus Facialis bei laterobasalen Schädelfrakturen. Med Mitt Melsungen 46/116:165–175

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knoche H, Schmitt G (1976) Autoradiographische Untersuchungen über den Einfluß des Faktors XIII auf die Wundheilung im Tierexperiment. Arzneimittelforschung 26:547–551

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuderna H (1981) Ergebnisse und Erfahrungen in der klinischen Anwendung des Fibrinklebers bei der Wiederherstellung durchtrennter peripherer Nerven. In: Cotte H, Martini AK (ed) Implante und Transplantate in der plastischen und Wiederherstellungschirurgie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 96–100

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuderna H, Dinges H, Redl H (1973) Nervenklebung. Dtsch Z Mund-Kiefer-Gesichts-Chir 3:32–35

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuderna H, Dinges H, Redl H (1980) Die Fibrinklebung in der Mikrochirurgie der peripheren Nerven. Hefte Unfallheilkd 148:822–825

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matras H, Braun F, Lassman H, Ammerer HP, Mamoli B (1973) Plasma clot welding of nerves (experimental report). J Maxillofac Surg 1:236–247

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miehlke A (1973) Surgery of the facial nerve. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Munich/Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  16. Millesi H (1968) Zum Problem der Überbrückung von defekten peripherer Nerven. Wien Med Wochenschr 118: 182–187

    Google Scholar 

  17. Millesi H (1977) Facial nerve suture. In: Fisch U (ed) Facial nerve surgery. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery. Zurich, 1976. Kugler Amstelveen, pp 209–215

  18. Millesi H, Berger A, Meissl G (1972) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Heilung durchtrennter peripherer Nerven. Chir Plast 1: 174–206

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nomura S (1967) Observations on the operation method for the repair of the peripheral nerve injuries (in Japanese). Seikei Geka (Orthopaedic Surgery) 18:1242–1254. Quoted by Yamamoto and Fisch [24]

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rice DH, Berstein FD (1984) The use of autogenous vein for nerve grafting. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 92:410–412

    Google Scholar 

  21. Turowski G, Schaadt M, Berthels M, Diel G, Poliwoda H (1980) Unterschiedlicher Einfluß von Fibrinogen und Faktor XIII auf das Wachstum von Primärund Kulturfibroblasten. In: Schimpf K (Hrsg) Fibrinogen, Fibrin und Fibrinkleber. Schattauer, Stuttgart New York, pp 227–237

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vuursteen PJ (1985) Nerve repair and regeneration. In: Portmann M (ed) Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Facial Nerve, Bordeaux, 1984. Masson, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wriedt-Lübbe I, Kuderna H, Denk G, Schlag G, Blümel G (1976) Fibrinolyse-autographische Untersuchungen traumatisch durchtrennter Nerven vor der Rekonstruktion. Kongressbericht Oesterr Ges Chir, Salzburg

  24. Yamamoto E, Fisch U (1974) Experiments on facial nerve suturing, ORL 36:193–204

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boedts, D. A comparative experimental study on nerve repair. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 244, 1–6 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00453481

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00453481

Key words

Navigation