Skip to main content
Log in

Assertion, denial, and the Liar Paradox

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arnauld, A., La Logique ou L'Art de Penser, 1662.

  • Austin, J., How to Do Things With Words, Oxford University Press, London, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K., ‘Categories, Negation, and the Liar Paradox’ in R.L. Martin (ed.) The Paradox of the Liar, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G., ‘Negation’, in M. Black and P. T. Geach (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Blackwell, Oxford, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M., The Language of Morals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S., ‘Outline of a Theory of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy (1975) 690–716.

  • Martin, R. L., ‘Reply to Hugly and Sayward’, Analysis 39 (1979) 169–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. L. and Woodruff, P., ‘On Representing ‘True-in-L’, in L’, Philosophia 5 (1975) 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routley, R., Meyer, R. K. et al., Relevant Logics and Their Rivals, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra (forthcoming).

  • Skyrms, B., ‘International Aspects of Semantical Self-Reference’, in R. L. Martin (ed.) (forthcoming).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parsons, T. Assertion, denial, and the Liar Paradox. J Philos Logic 13, 137–152 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00453019

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00453019

Keywords

Navigation