Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical value of combined contrast and radionuclide arthrography in suspected loosening of hip prostheses

  • Current Problem Cases
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Combined contrast and radionuclide arthrography was performed in 71 cemented, non-cemented and hybrid hip arthroplasties for diagnosis of component loosening. In 31 cases, either one or two prosthesis component were clearly loose upon clinical and radiological diagnosis, with subsequent intraoperative confirmation. The other 40 cases had doubtful component loosening, with discrepancy between clinical and radiological findings, and were investigated for clarification. Contrast and radionuclide arthrograms were compared with sequential plain radiographs and their ability to indicate component loosening was evaluated. The combined contrast and radionuclide arthrograms proved in 90.9% of the cases whether a loose component existed as confirmed by intraoperative findings. They had a high sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy for both the acetabular and the femoral component. Sensivity and predictive accuracy were remarkably precise in comparison to those of plain radiographs on the acetabular side. In nearly all patients with contradictory clinical and radiological findings, conclusive diagnosis was possible on the basis of the contrast and radionuclide arthrograms. Coinciding positive results in both contrast and radionuclide arthrograms were verified in each operated case. The combination of contrast and radionuclide arthrography is an useful method to diagnose doubtful looseing of hip arthroplasty components, especially in addition to routine sequential plain radiographs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdel-Dayem HM, Barodawala YK, Papademetriou T (1982) Scintigraphic arthrography: comparison with contrast arthrography and future applications. Clin Nucl Med 7:516–522

    Google Scholar 

  2. Enderle A (1973) Follow-up of 334 total hip replacements. In: Chapehal G (ed) Arthroplasty of the hip. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 145–152

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hendrix RW, Wixson RL, Rana NA (1983) Arthrography after total hip arthroplasty: a modified technique used in the diagnosis of pain. Radiology 148:647

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maus TP, Berquist TH, Bender CE (1987) Arthrographic study of painful total hip arthroplasty: refined criteria. Radiology 167:721

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miniaci A, Bailey WH, Bourne RB, McLaren AC, Rorabeck CH (1990) Analysis of radionuclide arthrograms, radiographic arthrograms, and sequential plain radiographs in assessment of painful hip arthroplasty. Arthroplasty 5:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murray WR, Rodrigo JJ (1975) Arthrography for the assessment of pain after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 57:1060–1065

    Google Scholar 

  7. O'Neil DA, Harris WH (1984) Failed total hip replacement: assessment by plain radiographs, arthrograms, and aspiration of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66:540–546

    Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips WC, Kattapuram SV (1982) Prosthetic hip replacement: plain films and arthrography for component loosening. AJR 138:677

    Google Scholar 

  9. Resnik CS, Fratkin MJ, Cardea JA (1986) Arthroscintigraphic evaluation of the painful total hip prosthesis. Clin Nucl Med 11:242–244

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenthall L, Aldis AE, Hill RO (1985) Combined radionuclide and radiocontrast arthrography for evaluating hip arthroplasty. Eur J Nucl Med 10:531–534

    Google Scholar 

  11. Salvati EA, Freiberger RH, Wilson PD (1971) Arthrography for complications of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 53:701–709

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schicha H, Perner K, Voth E, Reith HG, Willert HG, Emrich D (1986) Cementless implantation of Zweymueller-Endler total endoprostheses of the hip — clinical, radiological and scintigraphic follow-up for 2 years. Nucl Med 25:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  13. Swan JS, Braunstein EM, Wellmann HN, Capello W (1991) Contrast and nuclear arthrography in loosening of uncemented hip prosthesis. Skeletal Radiol 20:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  14. Uri G, Wellmann H, Capello W, Robb J, Greenman G (1984) Scintigraphic and X-ray arthrographic diagnosis of femoral prosthesis loosening: concise communication. Nucl Med 25:661–663

    Google Scholar 

  15. Willert HG, Lintner F (1987) Morphologie des Implantatlagers bei zementierten und nichtzementierten Gelenkimplantaten. Langenbecks Arch Chir 372:447–455

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Köster, G., Munz, D.L. & Köhler, H.P. Clinical value of combined contrast and radionuclide arthrography in suspected loosening of hip prostheses. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 112, 247–254 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451886

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451886

Keywords

Navigation