Abstract
Clinical biomedical research, the traditional research orientation of quality of life (QOL) researchers, is chiefly concerned with disease processes and assessing the impact of therapeutic interventions on improving health status and QOL outcomes. This paper suggests, however, that the biomedical paradigm limits utility of QOL research findings in terms of its ability to shape health policy and improve health-related QOL in populations at risk. This paper proposes that health services research (HSR) and other health research paradigms can be used to assess QOL from multiple perspectives. HSR and QOL research can be mutually beneficial. The models for understanding health services utilized in HSR may assist in defining major determinants of QOL and the interaction of QOL with its environment. Conversely, QOL measures may be used to establish the relevance of HSR to people's well-being. The paper first defines the domain of HSR and the domain of quality of life. In order to understand their relationship, we consider what a model or paradigm for each might be, and how they would overlap. Finally, a merging of conceptual frameworks is proposed, linking QOL research to HSR and other health research. Ultimately, expanding the QOL paradigm beyond the biomedical model will promote two objectives. First, it will permit research findings to contribute more fully to shaping national health policy by considering the broader community and the delivery system factors which influence QOL. Second, researchers will be more aware of a broader range of factors affecting patients and will incorporate this in their research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Institute of Medicine. Health Services Research.Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1979: 13–31.
Donabedian A. Models for organizing the delivery of personal health services and criteria for evaluating them. Milbank Memorial Fund Q 1992; 50: 103–54.
Donabedian A. Aspects of Medical Care Administration. Cambridge: Howard University Press, 1973.
Scott WR. Organizations-Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.
Thompson JD. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1967.
Hollandsworth JG. Evaluating the impact of medical treatment on the quality of life. Cancer 1984; 53(Suppl): 2327.
De Haes JCJM. Quality of life: conceptual and theoretical considerations. In: Watson M, Greer S, Thomas C, eds. Psychosocial Oncology. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1988: 61–70.
Cella DF, Cherin EA. Quality of life during and after cancer treatment. Comprehensive Ther 1988; 14(5): 69–75.
Cella DF, Tulsky DS. Quality of life in cancer: Definition, purpose, and method of assessment. Cancer Invest 1993; 11(3), 327–36.
Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Int Med 1993; 118: 622–9.
Aaronson NK. Quality of life: what is it? How should it be measured? Oncology 1988; 2: 69–74.
De Haes JCJM, Van Knippenberg FCE. The quality of life of cancer patients: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 1985; 20: 809–17.
Andrews FM, Withey SB. Social Indicators of Well-being: Americans' Perception of Life Quality. New York: Plenum, 1976.
Campbell A. Subjective measures of wellbeing. Am Psychol 1974; 31: 117–24.
Campbell A. The Sense of Well-being in America: Recent Patterns and Trends. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.
Wilcox LD et al. Social Indicators and Societal Monitoring: An Annotated Bibliography. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1972.
Kar SB, ed. Health Promotion Indicators and Actions. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1989.
Barofsky I. Quality of life assessment. Evolution of the concept. In: Ventafridda, et al., eds. Assessment of Quality of Life and Cancer Treatment. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (Biomedical Division), 1986.
Breslow L. A quantitative approach to the World Health Organization definition of health: physical, mental, and social well-being. Internatl J Epidemiol 1972; 1: 347–55.
World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. In: Basic Documents. Geneva: World Health Organziation, 1948.
Ware JE. The assessment of health status. In: Aiken L, Mechanic D, eds. Applications of Social Science to Clinical Medicine and Health Policy. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1986.
Greenfield S, Nelson EC. Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Med Care 1992; 30(Suppl 5): MS23–41.
Stewart AL. Conceptualizing and Measuring Quality of Life in Older Populations. In: Abeles R, Gift H, Orry M, eds. Ageing and Quality of Life. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1993.
Fowler FJ, Wennberg JE, Timothy RP, Barry MJ, Mulley AG, Hanley D. Symptom status and quality of life following prostatectomy. JAMA 1988; 259(20): 3018–22.
Testa MA. Quality of life during antihypertensive therapy: techniques for clinical assessment and evaluation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1987; 23: 9S-13S.
Wenger NK. Quality of life issues in hypertension: consequences of diagnosis and considerations in management. Am Heart J August 1988; 628–32.
Julius S. Quality of life during antihypertensive treatment. Postgrad Med 1988; 33–9.
Hume AL. Applying quality of life data in practice: considerations for antihypertensive therapy. J Family Practice 1989; 28(4): 403–11.
Tarlov AR, Ware JE, Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M. The medical outcomes study: an application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 1989; 262(7): 925–30.
Kravitz RL, Greenfield S, Rogers W et al. Differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and systems of care. JAMA 1992; 267(12): 1617–23.
Perloff JD, Kletke PR, Neckerman KM. Physicians' decision to limit Medicaid participation: determinants and policy implications. J Health Politics Policy Law 1987; 12: 221–35.
US Department of Health and Human Services. National Health Interview Survey. Hyattsville, MD. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics.
Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD et al. Functional Status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA 1989; 262: 295–930.
Ware JE. Measuring patient function and well-being: some lessons from the medical outcomes study. In: Heithoff KA, Lohr KN, eds. Effectiveness and Outcomes in Health Care, Proceedings of the Invitational Conference by the Institute of Medicine, Division of Health Care Services. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1990: 107–19.
Cleary PD. Using patient reports of outcomes to assess effectiveness of medical care. In: Heithoff KA, Lohr KN, eds. Effectiveness and Outcomes in Health Care, Proceedings of the Invitational Conference by the Institute of Medicine, Division of Health Care Services: Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1990: 152–59.
Tolsma DD, Koplan JP. Health Behaviors and Health Promotion. In: Last JM, Wallace RB, eds. Public Health and Preventive Medicine. San Mateo, CA: Appleton and Lange, 1992: 701–14.
Gellert GA. The importance of quality of life research for health care reform in the USA and the future of public health. 37. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 357–61.
Patrick DL, Bergner M. Measurement of Health Status in the 1990s. In: Breslow L, Fielding JE, Lave LB. Annu Rev Public Health 1990; 11: 165–83.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andersen, R.M., Davidson, P.L. & Ganz, P.A. Symbiotic relationships of quality of life, health services research and other health research. Qual Life Res 3, 365–371 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451728
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451728