Summary
The well-established association between myopia and superior intelligence in the general population was investigated in a group of intellectually gifted children and their less gifted full siblings to determine whether the relationship of myopia to psychometric intelligence is consistent with the hypothesis of pleiotropy, i.e., both characteristics are affected by the same gene or set of genes. Failure to find a difference in degree of myopia, assessed as a metric variable, between intellectually gifted and nongifted siblings would contradict pleiotropy. A variety of possible causal pathways, both genetic and environmental, have been hypothesized in the literature to explain the relationship between intelligence and myopia, and these still cannot be ruled out. It is theoretically noteworthy, however, in view of the independent evidence for the considerable heritability of both intelligence and myopia, that the highly significant gifted-nongifted sibling difference in myopia found in the present study is consistent with the hypothesis that intelligence and myopia are related pleiotropically.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashton GC (1985a) Nearwork, school achievement, and myopia. J Biosoc Sci 17:223–233
Ashton GC (1985b) Segregation analysis of ocular refraction and myopia. Hum Hered 35:232–239
Baldwin WR (1981) A review of statistical studies of relations between myopia and ethnic, behavioral and physiological characteristics. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 58:516–527
Bear JC, Richler A, Burke G (1981) Nearwork and familial resemblances in ocular refraction: a population study in Newfoundland. Clin Genet 19:462–472
Benbow CP (1986) Physiological correlates of extreme intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia 24:719–725
Benbow CP, Benbow RN (1984) Biological correlates of high mathematical reasoning ability. In: DeVries GJ, DeBruin JPC, Uylings HBM, Corner MA (eds) Sex differences in the brain —their relation between structure and function. Prog Brain Res 61: 469–490
Cohn H (1883) Die Hygiene des Auges in den Schulen. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Vienna
Cohn H (1986) The hygiene of the eye in schools. English transl edited by WP Turnball Simpkin, Marshall, London
Douglas JWB, Ross JM, Simpson HR (1967) The ability and attainment of short-sighted pupils. J R Stat Soc 130:479–503
Dunphy EB (1970) The biology of myopia. N Engl J Med 283:796–800
Francois J (1961) Heredity in ophthalmology. Mosby, St Louis, Mo
Furusho T (1957) Studies on the genetic mechanism of short-sightedness. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1:185–190
Grosvenor T (1970) Refractive state, intelligence test scores, and academic ability. Am J Optom 47:355–361
Guyton DL (1982) The American Optical SR-IV programmed subjective refractor: principles of design and operation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 59:800–814
Heron E, Zytoskee A (1981) Visual acuity and test performance. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 58:176
Hirsch MJ (1959) The relationship between refractive state of the eye and intelligence test scores. Am J Optom 36:12–21
Jablonski W (1922) Zur Vererbung der Myopie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 68:560–573
Jensen AR (1980) Uses of sibling data in educational and psychological research. Am Educ Res J 17:153–170
Karlsson JL (1973) Genetic relationship between giftedness and myopia. Hereditas 73:85–88
Karlsson JL (1974) Concordance rates for myopia in twins. Clin Genet 6:142–146
Karlsson JL (1975) Influence of the myopia gene on brain development. Clin Genet 8:314–318
Karlsson JL (1976) Genetic factors in myopia. Acta Genet Med Gemelol (Roma) 25:292–294
Lowe RF (1949) The eyes in mongolism. Br J Ophthalmol 33:131–174
McManus IC, Mascie-Taylor CGN (1983) Biosocial correlates of cognitive abilities. J Biosoc Sci 15:289
Paul SM (1986) The advanced Raven's progressive matrices: normative data for an American University population and an examination of the relationship with Spearman's g. J Exp Educ 54:95–100
Plomin R (1988) The nature and nurture of cognitive abilities. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, vol 4. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Post RH (1962) Population differences in vision acuity: a review, with speculative notes on selection relaxation. Soc Biol 9:189–212
Richler A, Bear JC (1980) Refraction, nearwork and education: a population study in Newfoundland. Acta Ophthalmol 58:468–478
Rosner M, Belkin M (1987) Intelligence, education and myopia in males. Arch Opthalmol 105:1508–1511
Scarr S, Carter-Saltzman L (1982) Genetics and intelligence. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Handbook of human intelligence. Cambridge University Press, New York
Scheffé H (1959) The analysis of variance. Willey, New York
Scholz D (1970) Die Beziehungen zwischen Myopie und Schulerfolg, Wachstum und sozialen Faktoren. Öff Gesundheitswesen 32: 530–535
Sorsby A, Fraser GR (1964) Statistical note on the components of ocular refraction in twins. J Med Genet 1:47–49
Sorsby A, Benjamin B, Davey JB, Sheridan M, Tanner JM (1957) Emmetropia and its abberations. MRC Spec Rep Ser 293:1–42
Sorsby A, Sheridan M, Leary GA (1962) Refraction and its components in twins. MRC Spec Rep Ser 303:1–43
Sorsby A, Leary GA, Fraser GR (1966) Family studies on ocular refraction and its components. J Med Genet 3:269–273
Spitz HH (1986) The raising of intelligence. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Terman LM (1925) Genetic studies of genius, vol 1: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif
Waardenburg PJ, Franceschetti A, Klein D (1963) Genetics and ophthalmology, vol 2. Royal Van Gorcum, Arsen
Wallman J, Gottlieb MD, Rojaram V, Fugate-Wentzek LA (1987) Local retinal regions control local eye growth and myopia. Science 237:73–77
Wold KC (1949) Hereditary myopia. Arch Ophthalmol 42:225–237
Young FA (1958) An estimate of the hereditary component of myopia. Am J Optom 35:337–345
Young FA (1963) Reading, measures of intelligence and refractive errors. Am J Optom 40:257 (cited in Ashton 1985a)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohn, S.J., Cohn, C.M.G. & Jensen, A.R. Myopia and intelligence:a pleiotropic relationship?. Hum Genet 80, 53–58 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451456
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451456