Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Possibilities and limitations of weighted averaging

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A statistical analysis of a weighted averaging procedure for the estimation of small signals buried in noise (Hoke et al. 1984a) is given. The weighting factor used by this method is in inverse proportion to the variance estimated for the noise. It is shown that, compred to conventional averaging, weighted averaging can improve the signal-to-noise ratio to a high extent if the variance of the noise changes as a function of time. On the other hand, uncritical application of the method involves the danger that the signal amplitude is underestimated. How serious this effect is depends on the number of degrees of freedom available for the estimation of the weighting factor. The effect can be neglected, if this number is sufficiently increased by means of an appropriate preprocessing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gevins AS (1984) Analysis of the electromagnetic signals of the human brain: Milestones, obstacles, and goals. IEEE Trans BME-31:833–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoke M, Ross B, Wickesberg RE, Lütkenhöner B (1984a) Weighted averaging — theory and application to electric response audiometry. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 57:484–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoke M, Wickesberg RE, Lütkenhöner B (1984b) Time- and intensity-dependent low-pass filtering of auditory brain stem responses. Audiology 23:195–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth DE (1969) The art of computer programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading Menlo Park London Don Mills, Vol. 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke NJD, de Weerd JPC, Strackee J (1983) Some criteria for the estimation of evoked potentials. Biol Cybern 48:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantev Ch, Lütkenhöner B, Hoke M, Lehnertz K (1985) Comparison between simultaneously recorded auditory evoked magnetic fields and potentials elicited by ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural tone-burst stimulation (submitted for publication to Audiology)

  • de Weerd JPC (1981) A posteriori time-varying filtering of averaged evoked potentials. Biol Cybern 41:211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen AD (1971) Detection of signals in noise. Academic Press, New York San Francisco London

    Google Scholar 

  • Woody CD (1967) Characterization of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neuroelectric signals. Med Biol Eng 5:539–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu KB, McGillem CD (1983) Optimum filters for estimating evoked potential waveforms. IEEE Trans BME-30:730–737

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Experimentelle Audiologie, HNO-Klinik der Universität Münster, D-4400, Münster, Federal Republic of Germany

    B. Lütkenhöner, M. Hoke & Ch. Pantev

Authors
  1. B. Lütkenhöner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Hoke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ch. Pantev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lütkenhöner, B., Hoke, M. & Pantev, C. Possibilities and limitations of weighted averaging. Biol. Cybern. 52, 409–416 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449599

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449599

Keywords

Search

Navigation