Skip to main content
Log in

Specificity of embryonic lethal mutations in Drosophila analyzed in germ line clones

  • Published:
Roux's archives of developmental biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Only a small fraction of the known mutations causing death to homozygous Drosophila produce gross morphological defects during embryogenesis. We have examined fourteen such loci on the X-chromosome to determine: 1) whether the requirement for their respective activities is restricted to embryogenesis; and 2) whether the embryonic phenotype in mutant embryos is affected by the dosage of wild-type alleles in the mother. For two alleles per locus germ line clones were produced during larval development by irradiating females heterozygous for the lethal mutation and a dominant female sterile (ovoD). Only one of the 14 loci (armadillo) is required during development of the germ cell to make morphologically normal eggs. Mutations at two other loci, (bazooka and Notch), allow normal oogenesis but cause major reductions in the viability of genetically normal (i.e., heterozygous) progeny. The majority of the loci (11/14) are not required in the germ line for either oogenesis or embryogenesis. However, in three cases (extradenticle, faintoid and lethal myospheroid), germ line homozygosity results in a readily detectible enhancement of embryonic phenotype over that observed in embryos derived from heterozygous mothers still possessing one wild type allele. The same six loci which show the most substantial effects on germ line homozygosity (arm, baz, N, exd, ftd and mys) also show an amelioration of the mutant phenotypes when maternal dosage is increased to wild type levels by using attached-X females. Four of these same loci (arm, baz, N and exd were cell lethal in imaginal discs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson KV, Lengyel JA (1981) Changing rates of DNA and RAN synthesis in Drosophila embryos. Dev Biol 82:127–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Busson D, Gans YWF, Komilopoulou M, Masson M (1983) Genetic analysis of three dominant female sterile mutations located on the X-chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 105:309–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos-Ortega JA, Jiminez F (1980) The effect of X-chromosome deficiencies in neurogenesis in Drosophila. In: Development and neurobiology of development, Siddiqi O, Babu P, Hall LM, Hall JC (eds) Plenum Press, New York, p 201–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EH (1976) Gene Activity in Early Development. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Bellido A, Robbins LG (1983) Viability of female germ-line cells homozygous for zygotic lethals in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 103:235–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Bellido A, Moscoso Del Prado J, Botas J (1983) The effect of aneuploidy on embryonic development in Drosophila melanogaster. Gen Genet 192:253–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen JP, Wieschaus EF (1985) The localized requirements for a gene affecting segmentation in Drosophila: Analysis of larvae mosaic for runt Dev Biol 109:321–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen JP, Wieschaus EF (1985) Localized requirements for gene activity in segmentation of Drosophila embryos: analysis of armadillo fused, giant and upd mutations in mosaic embryos. Wilhelm Roux's Archive [in press]

  • Haynie JL (1983) The maternal and zygotic roles of the gene Polycomb in embryonic development in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 100:399–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez F, Campos-Ortega JA (1982) Maternal effects of zygotic mutants affecting early neurogenesis in Drosophila. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 191:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens G, Wieschaus E, Nüsslein-Vollhard C, Kluding H (1984) Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Zygotic loci on third chromosome. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 193:283–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerridge S, Dura JM (1982) Lethal bithorax complex mutations of Drosophila melanogaster show no germline maternal effects. Dev Genet 3:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence PA, Johnston P, Struhl G (1983) Different requirements for homeotic genes in the soma and germline of Drosophila. Cell 35:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley DL, Grell EH (1968) Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst, Washington Publ 627

  • McKnight SL, Miller OL Jr (1976) Ultrastructural patterns of RNA synthesis during early embryogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 8:305–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Morata G, Ripoll P (1975) Minutes: mutants of Drosophila autonomously affecting cell division rate. Dev Biol 42:211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer J van der (1977) Optical clean and permanent wholemount preparation for phase-contrast microscopy of cuticular structures of insect larvae. Dros Inform Serv 52:160

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman S, Wright TF (1981) A histological and ultrastructural analysis of developmental defects produced by the mutations lethal (1) myospheroid in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 86:393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Nüsslein-Volhard C (1977) A rapid method for screening eggs from single Drosophila females. Dros Inform Serv 52:166

    Google Scholar 

  • Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E (1980) Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287:795–801

    Google Scholar 

  • Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E, Kluding E (1984) Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster. I Zygotic loci on the second chromosome. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 193:267–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrimon N, Engstrom L, Mahowald AP (1984) The effects of zygotic lethal mutations on female germ line functions in Drosophila. Dev Biol 105:404–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripoll R (1977) Behaviour of somatic cells homozygous for zygotic lethals in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 86:357–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieschaus E, Szabad J (1978) The development and function of the female germ line in Drosophila melanogaster: a cell lineage study. Dev Biol 68:29–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieschaus E, Marsh JL, Gehring WJ (1978) fs(1)K10: A germ line-dependent female sterile mutation causing abnormal chorion morphology in Drosophila melanogaster. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 184:75

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieschaus E, Audit C, Masson M (1981) A clonal analysis of the roles of somatic and germ line during oogenesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol 88:92–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieschaus E, Nüsslein-Volhard C, Jürgens G (1984) Mutations affecting the pattern of the larvae cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster III. Zygotic loci on the X-chromosome. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 193:296–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieschaus E, Nüsslein-Volhard C, Kluding H (1984) Kruppel, a gene whose activity is required early in the zygotic genome for normal embryonic segmentation. Dev Biol 104:172–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright TRF (1960) Phenogenetics of the embryonic mutant, lethal myospheroid in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Zool 143:77–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalokar M, Erk I (1977) Phase-partition fixation and staining of Drosophila eggs. Stain Tech 52:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Zusman SB, Wieschaus EF (1985) Requirements for zygotic gene activity during gastrulation in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 111:359–371

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wieschaus, E., Noell, E. Specificity of embryonic lethal mutations in Drosophila analyzed in germ line clones. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 195, 63–73 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00444042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00444042

Key words

Navigation