Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Variation in the airborne fungal spore population of the Tuscarawas Valley II

A comparison of arboreal and nonarboreal microenvironments

  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For years the medical profession has recognized a relationship between fungal airspora and the incitement of respiratory allergies. An evaluation of outdoor fungal airspora on an eastern Ohio campus during June 1988 revealed significant differences in quality and quantity with respect to microenvironments. Type of vegetation, diurnal periodicities, and daily weather conditions affected the airspora at each site. Shaded lawns within groves and windbreaks, unshaded lawns, and asphalt-covered parking lots presented varying dynamics for fungal spore liberation. Unshaded lawns produced airspora most abundantly during morning and least abundantly during afternoon. Arboreal sites produced airspora most prolifically at midday. A deciduous sycamore grove produced fewer afternoon airspora than evergreen pine and arborvitae stands. Evening airspora at all vegetated sites increased after experiencing afternoon troughs. Frequently encountered molds included Cladosporium spp., brightly pigmented sterile mycelia, and Alternaria spp.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bulmer GS. Fungi and fungus allergy. In: Creip LH, ed. Clinical immunology and allergy. 2nd ed. New York: Gruen & Stratton, Inc., 1969; 351–377.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Doory Y, Domson JF, Howard WA, Sly RM. Airborne fungi and pollens of the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area. Ann Allergy 1980; 45: 360–367.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Doory Y, Domson JF, Best J. Further studies of the airborne fungi and pollens of the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area. Ann Allergy 1982; 49: 265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beaumont F, Kauffman HF, van der Mark TH, Sluiter HJ, de Vries K. Volumetric aerobiological survey of conidial fungi in the north-east Netherlands. Allergy 1985; 40: 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Levitin E, Horowitz L. A one-year survey of the airborne molds of Tulsa, Oklahoma. I. Outdoor survey. Ann Allergy 1978; 41: 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kramer CL, Eversmeyer MG. Uniformity of airspora concentrations. In: EXS 51: Advances in aerobiology. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag, 1987; 313–317.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nussbaum F. Variation in the airborne fungal spore population of the Tuscarawas Valley with respect to microenvironment, time of day and date. Ohio J Sci 1990; 90:77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lopez M, Salvaggio JE. Mold-sensitive asthma. Clin Rev Allergy 1985; 3: 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chatigny MA, Macher JM, Burge HA, Solomon WR. Sampling airborne microorganisms and aeroallergens. In: Hering SV, ed. Air sampling instruments for evaluation of atmospheric contaminants. 7th ed. Cincinnati: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1989; 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lacey J, Dutkiewicz J. Isolation of actinomycetes and fungi from mouldy hay using a sedimentation chamber. J Appl Bacteriol 1976; 41: 315–319.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beneke ES, Rogers AL. Medical mycology manual with human mycoses monograph. 4th ed. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Co., 1980; 28.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ambrose HW, Ambrose KP. A handbook of biological investigation. 4th ed. Winston-Salem: Hunter Textbooks Inc., 1987; 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gregory PH, Hirst JM. The summer air-spora at Rothamsted in 1952. J Gen Microbiol 1957; 17: 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eicker A. Non-parasitic mycoflora of the phylloplane and litter of Panicum coloratum. Trans Br Mycol Soc 1976; 67: 275–281.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kelly SG, Post FJ, Microbiology techniques. Belmont CA: Star Publishing Co., 1991; 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ingold CT. Spore liberation. London: Oxford University Press. 1965; 75–116.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Royes VIJ. Some components of the air spora in Jamaica and their possible medical application. Grana 1987; 26: 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lyon FL, Kramer CL, Eversmeyer MG. Variation of airspora in the atmosphere due to weather conditions. Grana 1984; 23: 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Larsen LS. A three-year-suravey of microfungi in the air of Copenhagen 1977–79. Allergy 1981; 36: 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rantio-Lehtimaki A. Research on airborne-fungus spores in Finland. Grana 1977; 16: 163–165.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Budd TW. Allergens of Altemaria. Grana 1986; 25: 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vijay HM, Burton M, Young NM, Corlette M, Bernstein IL. Comparative studies of allergens from mycelia and culture media of four new strains of Alternaria tennis. Grana 1989; 28: 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Tuscarawas Regional Campus, 44663, New Philadelphia, OH, USA

    Francis Nussbaum

Authors
  1. Francis Nussbaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nussbaum, F. Variation in the airborne fungal spore population of the Tuscarawas Valley II. Mycopathologia 116, 181–198 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436834

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436834

Key words

Search

Navigation