Skip to main content
Log in

Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The rate of postoperative dislocation after Stanmore total hip arthroplasty in 427 cases was 4.9%; 1.4% were classified as recurrent cases. Retroversion of the acetabular component and postoperative joint laxity were the only factors that were found to predispose to dislocation. The importance of preserving the effective femoral neck length during total hip arthroplasty is emphasized.

Zusammenfassung

Die postoperative Luxationsrate nach Implantation einer Stanmore-Hüftgelenk-Totalprothese betrug in 427 Fällen 4,9%, wovon 1,4% wiederkehrende Luxationen darstellten. Eine Retroversion der Prothesenpfanne and eine postoperative Weichteillaxität im Hüftgelenkbereich waren die einzigen Faktoren, die als pradisponierend für eine Luxation ermittelt wurden. Auf die Bedeutung der Erhaltung der effektiven Schenkelhalslänge bei der Implantation einer Totalprothese wird besonders hingewiesen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlsson ÅS, Gentz CF (1977) Postoperative dislocation in the Charnley and Brunswick total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 125:177–182

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chandler RW, Dorr LD, Perry J (1982) The functional cost of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 168:168–172

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eftekhar NS (1976) Dislocation and instability complicating low friction arthroplasty of the hip joint. Clin Orthop 121:120–125

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fackler CD, Poss R (1980) Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 151:169–177

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fraser GA, Wroblewski BM (1981) Revision of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty for recurrent or irreducible dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 63:552–555

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnsson R, Bendjelloul H, Ekelund L, Persson BM, Lidgren L (1984) Comparison between hemiarthroplasty and total hip replacement following failure of nailed femoral neck fractures focused on dislocations. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 102:187–190

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60:217–220

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lindberg HO, Carlsson Å, Gentz CF, Pettersson H (1982) Recurrent and nonrecurrent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. Acta. Orthop Scand 53:947–952

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ritter MA (1976) Dislocation and subluxation of the total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121:92–94

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scales JT, Wilson JN (1968) Some aspects of the development of the Stanmore total hip prosthesis. Rec Surg Traumatol 11:20–39

    Google Scholar 

  11. Williams JF, Gottesman MJ, Mallory TH (1982) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 171:53–58

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kristiansen, B., Jørgensen, L. & Hölmich, P. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. Arch. Orth. Traum. Surg. 103, 375–377 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435444

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435444

Keywords

Navigation