Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines how ethical and unethical corporate behavior influence the perceived value of a firm's products, operationalized as the price consumers are willing to pay for that product relative to the competition. We propose that if consumers expect companies to conduct business ethically, then ethical behavior will not be rewarded but unethical behavior will be punished. The results of the first study confirm this expectation. The second study explored ways a firm can improve the perceived value of its products after an unethical act has been committed. Our results indicate that after a firm has committed an unethical act, consumer's perceptions of that company and its products were positively influenced by ethical behavior, corporate philanthropy, and cause-related marketing. However, our analyses revealed that these different strategies varied in their effectiveness. The third study used a choice task, rather than a judgment task, to confirm the finding that corporate behavior does influence perceived product value and is therefore likely to influence market choices. The implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, Walter F., and Joseph R. Monsen. (1979). “On the Measurement of Corporate Responsibility.” Academy of Management Journal 22 (September), 501–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Addelman, Sidney. (1962). “Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Fractional Factorial Plans.” Technometrics 4 (February), 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Gordon J., and Buchholz, Rogene A. (1978). “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 21 (September), 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, Kenneth E., Archie B. Carroll, and John D. Hatfield. (1985). “An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Responsibility and Profitability.” Academy of Management Journal 28 (June), 446–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhide, Amar, and Howard H. Stevenson. (1990). “Why Be Honest If Honesty Doesn't Pay.” Harvard Business Review 68 (September–October), 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, James S. (1976). “Managerial Ethics in Business and Government.” Business Horizons 19 (October), 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, David S., Jordan J. Louviere, and Don Anderson. (1994). “A Comparison of Experimental Design Strategies for Multinomial Logit Models: The Case of Generic Attributes.” Working paper, Graduate School of Management, University of California at Davis.

  • Cochrane, Philip L., and Robert A. Wood. (1984). “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 27 (March), 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, Alan J., Eric N. Berkowitz, and William Rudelius. (1980). “Ethical Problems of Field Sales Personnel.” MSU Business Topics 28 (Summer), 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O.C., and Larry G. Gresham. (1985). “A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing.” Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer), 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E., and Yoram Wind. (1975). “New Way to Measure Consumers' Judgments.” Harvard Business Review 53 (July–August), 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Joel, and William James. (1976). “The Monetary Worth of Physical Attributes: A Dollarmetric Approach.” Krannert Graduate School of Management Working Paper 579.

  • Huber, Joel, and Klaus B. Zwerina. (1995). “The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs.” Working paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.

  • Hunt, Shelby D., Lawrence B. Chonko, and James B. Wilcox. (1984). “Ethical Problems of Marketing Research.” Journal of Marketing Research 21 (August), 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (March), 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Patrick E., and Gerry R. Laczniak. (1981). “Marketing Ethics: A Review with Implications.” In Ben M. Enis and Kenneth J. Roering (eds.), Review of Marketing (pp. 251–266). Chicago: AMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard L. (1980). “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions.” Journal of Marketing Research 17 (Novermber), 460–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard L., and John E. Swan. (1989). “Equity and Disconfirmation Perceptions as Influences on Merchant and Product Satisfaction.” Journal of Consumer Research 16 (December), 372–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Diana C., and Erin Anderson. (1993). “Control System and Task Environment Effects on Ethical Judgment: An Exploratory Study of Industrial Salespeople.” Organizational Science 3(4), 617–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard. (1985). “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice.” Marketing Science 4 (Summer), 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tybout, Alice M., and Gerald Zaltman, (1974). “Ethics in Marketing Research: Their Practical Relevance.” Journal of Marketing Research 11 (November), 357–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, Stanley C. (1975). “Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks?” Management Review 64(8), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, Robert A., and Richard L. Oliver. (1991). “The Dimensionality of Consumption Emotion Patterns and Consumer Satisfaction.” Journal of Consumer Research 18 (June), 84–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, Robert B., Ernest R. Cadotte, and Roger L. Jenkins. (1983). “Modeling Consumer Satisfaction Processes Using Experience-Based Norms.” Journal of Marketing Research 20 (august), 296–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Creyer, E.H., Ross, W.T. The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value. Market Lett 7, 173–185 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434908

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434908

Key words

Navigation