Abstract
The influences of genotype and sex on spontaneous motor activity in a Y-maze after nicotine administration and on nicotine concentrations in liver and brain were assessed in three inbred mouse strains. The rank order of liver nicotine elimination rates in these strains was found to be C57>C3H=DBA for females and DBA>C3H=C57 for males. Within the C57 and C3H strains, females eliminated nicotine significantly faster than males, while DBA females and males eliminated nicotine at similar rates. The rank order of motor depression at early time points after nicotine administration was found to be DBA=C57>C3H for both males and females. Females of all three strains demonstrated less sensitivity to nicotine's depressant effects than males. There did not appear to be any consistent association between rate of liver nicotine elimination or brain nicotine level and motor depression as measured in the Y-maze. Although variability in liver nicotine elimination and in brain nicotine content may account for some of the observed behavioral effects, these data suggest that strain and sex differences in tissue sensitivity to nicotine are of primary importance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bättig K, Driscoll P, Schlatter J, Uster HJ (1976) Effects of nicotine on the exploratory locomotion patterns of female Roman High-and Low-Avoidance rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 4:435–439
Bovet D, Bovet-Nitti F, Oliverio A (1967) Action of nicotine on spontaneous and acquired behavior in rats and mice. Ann NY Acad Sci 142:261–267
DeFries JC, Hegmann, JP, Weir MW (1966) Open-field behavior in mice: Evidence for a major gene effect mediated by the visual system. Science 154:1577–1579
Ferguson GA (1966) Statistical analysis in psychology and education. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 181
Fleming JC, Broadhurst PL (1975) The effects of nicotine on two-way avoidance conditioning in bi-directionally selected strains of rats. Psychopharmacologia 42:147–152
Garg M (1968) The effect of nicotine on rearing in two strains of rats. Life Sci 7:421–429
Garg M (1969a) The effects of some central nervous system stimulant and depressant drugs on rearing activity in rats. Psychopharmacologia 14:150–156
Garg M (1969b) Variation in effects of nicotine in four strains of rats. Psychopharmacologia 14:432–438
Hirshhorn ID, Rosecrans JA (1974) Studies on the time course and the effect of cholinergic and adrenergic receptor blockers on the stimulus effect of nicotine. Psychopharmacologia 40:109–120
Hucker HB, Gilette JR, Brodie BB (1960) Enzymatic pathway for the formation of cotinine, a major metabolite of nicotine in rabbit liver. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 129:94–100
Kramer CY (1956) Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 12:307–310
McClearn GE (1960) Strain differences in activity of mice: Influence of illumination. J Comp Physiol Psychol 53:142–143
McReynolds WE, Weir MW, DeFries JC (1967) Open-field behavior in mice: Effect of test illumination. Psychon Sci 9:277–278
Morrison CF (1969) Effect of nicotine on motor coordination and spontaneous activity in mice. J Pharm Pharmacol 21:35–37
Morrison CF, Lee PN (1968) A comparison of the effects of nicotine and physiostigmine on a measure of activity in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 13:210–221
Rosecrans JA (1971) Effects of nicotine on brain area 5-hydroxytryptamine function in male and female rats separated for differences in activity. Eur J Pharmacol 16:123–127
Rosecrans JA (1972) Brain area nicotine levels in male and female rats with different levels of spontaneous activity. Neuropharmacology 11:863–870
Rosecrans JA, Schechter MD (1972) Brain area nicotine levels in male and female rats of two strains. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 196:46–54
Winer BJ (1962) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 92
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hatchell, P.C., Collins, A.C. The influence of genotype and sex on behavioral sensitivity to nicotine in mice. Psychopharmacology 71, 45–49 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433251
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433251