Skip to main content
Log in

Extinction and dopamine receptor blockade after intermittent reinforcement training: Failure to observe functional equivalence

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Response decrements in an operant task produced by either extinction or by the dopamine receptor blocker pimozide were examined in three experiments which employed intermittent reinforcement schedules. In contrast to the congruency between these treatments previously observed following continuous reinforcement training, treatment with pimozide was markedly more effective than extinction in decreasing performance after training with variable interval, fixed interval, and fixed ratio reinforcement. The two treatments also produced substantially different patterns of responding. A shift from extinction to pimozide did not alter the progressive decline in response rate over days, but a shift from pimozide to extinction caused a pronounced increase of performance. These results indicate that the pimozide and extinction treatment did not produce functionally equivalent effects, and that the role of dopamine on reward processes should not be inferred from comparisons between pimozide and extinction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anisman, H., Remington, G., Sklar, L. S.: Effects of inescapable shock on subsequent escape performance: Catecholaminergic and cholinergic modification of response initiation and maintenance. Psychopharmacology 61, 107–124 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindra, D.: A motivational view of learning, performance, and behavior modification. Psychol. Rev. 81, 199–214 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bignami, G.: Effects of neuroleptics, ethanol, hypnotic-sedatives, tranquilizers, narcotics, and minor stimulants in aversive paradigms. In: Psychopharmacology of aversively motivated behavior, H. Anisman, G. Bignami, eds., pp. 385–455. New York: Plenum 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Bignami, G., Michalek, H.: Cholinergic mechanisms in aversively motivated behavior. In: Psychopharmacology of aversively motivated behavior, H. Anisman, G. Bignami, eds., pp. 173–255. New York: Plenum

  • Beninger, R. J., Phillips, A. G.: The blockade of conditioned reinforcement by pimozide. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 4, 255 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fibiger, H. C., Zis, A. P., Phillips, G.: Haloperidol-induced disruption of conditioned avoidance responding: Attenuation by prior training or by anticholinergic drugs. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 30, 309–314 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouriezos, G., Hansson, P., Wise, R. A.: Neuroleptic-induced attenuation of brain stimulation rewards in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 92, 661–671 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E.: Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Wadsworth: Betriont 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. F., Levitan, D., Stricker, E. M.: Activation-induced restoration of sensorimotor functions in rats with dopamine depleting brain lesions. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 90, 536–546 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. G., Fibiger, H. C.: Decreased resistance to extinction after haloperidol: Implications for the role of dopamine in reinforcement. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 10, 751–760 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls, E. T., Rolls, B. J., Kelly, P. H., Shaw, S. G., Wood, R. J., Dale, R.: The relative attenuation of self stimulation, eating, and drinking produced by dopamine receptor blockade. Psychopharmacologia 38, 219–230 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, L.: Norepinephrine reward pathway: Role in self-stimulation, memory consolidation and schizophrenia. Nebr. Symp. Motiv. 113–159 (1974)

  • Tombaugh, T. N., Tombaugh, J., Anisman, H.: Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on alimentary behaviors: Home-cage food consumption, magazine training, operant acquisition, and performance. Psychopharmacology 66, 219–226 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • White, N., Brown, Z., Yachnin, M.: Effects of catecholamine manipulations on three different self-stimulation behaviors. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 9, 273–278 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, R. A., Spindler, J., deWit, H., Gerber, G.: Neuroleptic-induced ‘anhedonia’ in rats: Pimozide blocks the reward quality of focal. Science 201, 262–264 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, R. A.: Catecholamine theories of reward: A critical review. Brain Res. 152, 215–247 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokel, R. A., Wise, R. A.: Increased lever pressing for amphetamine after pimozide in rats: Implications for a dopamine theory of reward. Science 187, 547–549 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokel, B. A., Wise, R. A.: Attenuating intravenous amphetamine reinforcement by central dopamine blockade in rats. Psychopharmacology 48, 311–318 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tombaugh, T.N., Anisman, H. & Tombaugh, J. Extinction and dopamine receptor blockade after intermittent reinforcement training: Failure to observe functional equivalence. Psychopharmacology 70, 19–28 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00432365

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00432365

Key words

Navigation