Skip to main content
Log in

Pimozide attenuates free feeding: Best scores analysis reveals a motivational deficit

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pimozide treatment (1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg) decreased free feeding in rats. The animals were presented daily with 35 meal segments, each consisting of five 45-mg pellets; pimozide resulted in longer mean latencies to initiate eating, longer mean eating times per segment (duration scores) and more pellets left uneaten. The increase in durations was progressive both within and across test sessions; toward the end of the final session many pellets were left uneaten. Failure to initiate eating of the first pellet of each segment was rare, and was always preceded by failure to eat the fifth pellet of the preceding meal segment. To assess whether either the increase in latencies or the increase in durations reflected an impairment of absolute response capability, ‘best scores’ in the pimozide and control conditions were compared; the shortest latencies and durations in the pimozide condition were as ‘good’ as those of the control condition. However, the animals generally produced ‘best’ scores on fewer trials in the pimozide condition. An exception was on day 1 of testing, when the frequency of ‘best’ latencies was higher in the pimozide condition. The fact that the ‘best’ scores under pimozide equalled the ‘best’ scores under vehicle suggests that the pimozide-treated animals had the motoric capacity to respond normally. The facts that the pimozide-treated animals did not perform to the demonstrated limits of that capacity in a normal percentage of trials and that performance on days 2 and 3 of testing were ‘worse’ than performance on day 1 of testing suggest that pimozide causes a motivational deficit that has not been widely recognized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlenius S (1979) An analysis of behavioral effects produced by drug-induced changes in dopaminergic neurotransmission in the brain. Scand J Psychol 20:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsel A, Roussel J (1952) Motivational properties of frustration. I. Effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex. J Exp Psychol 43:363–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbeau A (1974) Drugs affecting movement disorders. Annu Rev Pharmacol 14:91–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell JE, Tombros E, Rogers PJ, Latham CJ (1980) Behavioral analysis of feeding: Implications for the pharmacological manipulation of food intake in animals and man. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol 4:319–326

    Google Scholar 

  • deWit H, Wise RA (1977) Blockade of cocaine reinforcement in rats with the dopaminergic receptor blocker pimozide but not with the noradrenergic blockers phentolamine or phenoxybenzamine. Can J Psychol 31:195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Fibiger HC, Carter DA, Phillips AG (1976) Decreased intracranial self-stimulation after neuroleptics or 6-hydroxydopamine: Evidence for mediation by motor deficits rather than by reduced reward. Psychopharmacology 47:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Fibiger HC, Zis AP, Phillips AG (1975) Haloperidol-induced disruption of conditioned avoidance responding: Attenuation by prior training or by anticholinergic drugs. Eur J Pharmacol 30:309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouriezos G, Hansson P, Wise RA (1978) Neuroleptic-induced attenuation of brain stimulation reward. J Comp Physiol Psychol 92:659–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouriezos G, Wise RA (1976) Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: Response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits. Brain Res 103:377–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin KBJ (1978) Catecholamines and self-stimulation: Reward and performance deficits dissociated. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9:813–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin KBJ, McCoy SN (1979) Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: Stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber GJ, Sing J, Wise RA (1981) Pimozide attenuates lever pressing for water reinforcement in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 14:201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffner TG, Zigmond MJ, Stricker EM (1977) Effects of dopaminergic agonists and antagonists on feeding in intact and 6-hydroxy-dopamine-treated rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 201:386–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornykiewicz O (1975) Parkinsonism induced by dopamine antagonists. Adv Neurol 9:155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen P, Niemegeers S, Schellekens KHL, Dresse A, Lenaerts FM, Pinchard A, Schaper WKA, Van Nueten JM, Verbruggen FJ (1968) Pimozide, a chemically novel, highly potent, and orally long-acting neuroleptic. I. The comparative pharmacology of pimozide, haloperidol and chlorpromazine. Arzneim Forsch 18:261–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Koob GF (1982) The dopamine anhedonia hypothesis: A pharmacological phrenology. Behav Brain Sci 5:63–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JF, Barrios N, Sawyer S (1980) Neostriatal dopamine and sensory inattention. J Comp Physiol Psychol 94:833–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx MH, Tombaugh TN, Hatch RS, Tombaugh JW (1965) Controlled operant conditioning boxes with discrete-trial programming for multiple experimental use. Percept Mot Skills 21:247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason ST, Beninger RJ, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1980) Pimozide-induced suppression of responding: Evidence against a block of food reward. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:917–923

    Google Scholar 

  • Posluns D (1962) An analysis of chlorpromazine-induced suppression of the avoidance response. Psychopharmacologia 3:361–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls ET, Rolls BJ, Kelly PH, Shaw RJ, Wood RJ, Dale R (1974) The relative attenuation of self-stimulation, eating and drinking produced by dopamine-receptor blockade. Psychopharmacology 38:219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1982) Attenuation by haloperidol of place preference conditioning using food reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 77:379–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Stricker EM, Zigmond MJ (1976) Recovery of function following damage to central catecholamine-containing neurons: A neurochemical model for the lateral hypothalamic syndrome. In: Sprague JM, Epstein AN (eds) Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology. Academic, New York, pp 121–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh TN, Tombaugh J, Anisman H (1979) Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on alimentary behaviors: Home cage food consumption, magazine training, operant acquisition, and performance. Psychopharmacology 66:219–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh TN, Anisman H, Tombaugh J (1980) Extinction and dopamine receptor blockade after intermittent reinforcement: Failure to observe functional equivalence. Psychopharmacology 70:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerstedt U (1971) Adipsia and aphagia after 6-hydroxydopamine-induced degeneration of the nigro-striatal dopamine system. Acta Physiol Scand (Suppl) 367:95–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA (1982) Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis. Behav Brain Sci 5:39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Spindler J, deWit H, Gerber GJ (1978a) Neuroleptic-induced ‘anhedonia’ in rats: Pimozide blocks the reward quality of food. Science 201:262–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Spindler J, Legault L (1978b) Major attenuation of food reward with performance-sparing doses of pimozide in the rat. Can J Psychol 32:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokel RA, Wise RA (1975) Increased lever-pressing for amphetamine after pimozide in rats: Implications for a dopamine theory of reward. Science 187:547–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokel RA, Wise RA (1976) Attenuation of intravenous amphetamine reinforcement by central dopamine blockade in rats. Psychopharmacology 48:311–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Zis AP, Fibiger HC (1975) Neuroleptic-induced deficits in food and water regulation: Similarities to the lateral hypothalamic syndrome. Psychopharmacology 43:63–68

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wise, R.A., Colle, L.M. Pimozide attenuates free feeding: Best scores analysis reveals a motivational deficit. Psychopharmacology 84, 446–451 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00431448

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00431448

Key words

Navigation