Skip to main content
Log in

Variable resistance versus constant resistance strength training in adult males

  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Changes in strength, body composition and anthropometric measures for groups training with constant resistance and variable resistance training procedures was compared. Thirty-six male volunteers were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Constant Resistance (CR), Variable Resistance (VR) and Control (C). Strength training was conducted 3 days per week, 45 min per day, for 10 weeks. The results demonstrated that both the CR and the VR groups increased muscular strength. The CR group demonstrated significant increases in strength over the VR group when strength was assessed by CR procedures. Conversely, the VR group demonstrated significant increases in strength over the CR group when strength was assessed by VR procedures. Neither group exhibited superiority over the other relative to changes in body composition and anthropometric measures. The significance of these results is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berger, R. A.: Effect of varied weight training programs on strength. Res. Quart. Amer. Hlth phys. Educ. 33, 168–181 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berger, R. A.: Comparison between resistance load and strength improvement. Res. Quart. Amer. Hlth phys. Educ. 33, 637 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berger, R. A.: Comparison of static and dynamic strength increases. Res. Quart. Amer. Hlth phys. Educ. 33, 329–333 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, R. A.: Comparison of the effect of various weight training loads on strength. Res. Quart. Amer. Hlth phys. Educ. 33, 141–146 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Capen, E. K.: The effect of systematic weight training on power, strength and endurance. Res. Quart. Amer. Hlth phys. Educ. 21, 83–93 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chui, E.: The effect of systematic weight training on athletic power. Res. Quart. Amer. Hlth phys. Educ. 21, 188–194 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, D. H.: Adaptations in strength and muscular endurance resulting from exercise. Vol. 1. Exercise and sports sciences reviews (J. H. Wilmore, ed.). New York: Academic Press 1973

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fahey, T. D., Brown, C. H.: The effects of an anabolic steroid on the strength, body composition, and endurance of college males when accompanied by a weight training program. Med. Sci. Sports 5, 172–276 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  9. O'Shea, P.: Effect of selected weight training programs on the development of strength and muscle hypertrophy. Res. Quart. Amer. Hlth phys. Educ. 37, 95–102 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peterson, J. A.: Total conditioning: A case study. Athletic Journal 55, 40–55 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pipes, T. V., Wilmore, J. H.: Isokinetic vs isotonic strength training in adult men. Med. Sci. Sports 7, 262–274 (1975)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Plese, E.: The Colorado experiment. Athletic Journal 53, 42–44 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Siri, W. E.: Body composition from fluid spaces and density. Univ. Cal. Donner Lab. Med. Physics Dept., March 19, 1956

  14. Wilmore, J. H.: A simplified method for determination of residual lung volumes J. appl. Physiol. 27, 96–100 (1969)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilmore, J. H., Behnke, A. R.: An anthropometric estimation of body density and lean body weight in young men. J. appl. Physiol. 27, 25–31 (1969)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pipes, T.V. Variable resistance versus constant resistance strength training in adult males. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol. 39, 27–35 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429676

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429676

Key words

Navigation