Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol, barbital, and phenobarbital in rats

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Five different groups of rats were trained in a food-motivated, bar-pressing task to discriminate from the nondrug condition (physiologic saline, i.p.) the effects produced by i.p. injections of ethanol (330, 660, or 990 mg/kg), sodium barbital (80 mg/kg), or sodium phenobarbital (25 mg/kg). The establishment of highly effective discriminations required 20–40 training sessions for all drugs, with the exception that rats trained with 330 mg/kg of ethanol required 80–100 training sessions. After the drug-nondrug discriminations were well established, cross tests revealed that ethanol did not elicit drug-appropriate responding in the groups trained with sodium barbital or sodium in the groups trained with sodium barbital or sodium phenobarbital. However, both barbiturates elicited drug-approppriate responding to some extent in rats trained with ethanol as the discriminative stimulus. With barbital, the greatest generalization was observed in rats trained with the low dose of ethanol (330 mg/kg). The findings emphasize the need for the use of several training doses and for transfer tests in both directions when the stimulus effects of drugs are compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry, H., III: Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats. Fed. Proc. 33, 1814–1824 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, H., III, Krimmer, E. C.: Discriminable stimuli produced by alcohol and other CNS depressants. In: Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs, H. Lal, ed., pp 73–92. New York: Plenum 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, H., III, Krimmer, E. C.: Pentobarbital effects perceived by rats as resembling several other depressants but not alcohol. Proc. 80th Ann. Convention, Am. Psychol. Assoc. 7, 849–850 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, E. M.: Alcohol and barbiturates: two ways of getting drunk. In: Licit and illicit drugs, pp. 249–254. Boston: Little, Brown 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Devenyi, P., Wilson, M.: Barbiturate abuse and addiction and their relationship to alcohol and alcoholism. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 104, 215–218 (1971a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Devenyi, P., Wilson, M.: Abuse of barbiturates in an alcoholic population. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 104, 219–221 (1971b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, H. F., Wikler, A., Isbell, H., Johnson, N. K.: Partial equivalence of chronic alcohol and barbiturate intoxications. Q. J. Stud. Alcohol 18, 541–555 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatt, M. M.: The abuse of barbiturates in the United Kingdom. Bull. Narc. 14, 19–38 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greizerstein, H. B., Smith, C. M.: Development and loss of tolerance to ethanol in goldfish. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Exp. Ther. 187, 391–399 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. E., Haertzen, C. A., Wolbach, A. B., Jr. Miner, E. J.: The Addiction Research Center inventory: standardization of scales which evaluate subjective effects of morphine, amphetamine, pentobarbital, alcohol, LSD-25, pyrahexyl and chlorpromazine. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 4, 167–183 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Isbell, H.: Chronic barbiturate intoxication. Am. Med. Assoc. Neurol. Psychiatry 64, 8 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimble, G.: Hilgard and Marquis' conditioning and learming. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, D. A.: State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 10, 6–31 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, D. A.: Comparison of ethanol, pentobarbital and phenobarbital using drug vs. drug discrimination training. Psychopharmacology 53, 195–199 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, P. B., Ho, B. T.: Characterization of discriminative response control by psychomotor stimulants. In: Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs, H. Lal, ed., pp. 107–119. New York: Plenum 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallgren, H., Barry, H., III: Actions of alcohol, Vol. 1. Biochemical, physiological and psychological aspects. New York: Elsevier 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesson, D. R., Smith, D. E.: Barbiturates: their use, misuse, and abuse. New York: Human Science 1977

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. New York State Research Institute on Alcoholism, 1021 Main Street, 14203, Buffalo, New York, USA

    James L. York

Authors
  1. James L. York
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

York, J.L. A comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol, barbital, and phenobarbital in rats. Psychopharmacology 60, 19–23 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429173

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429173

Key words

Search

Navigation