Skip to main content
Log in

Relative abuse liability of diazepam and oxazepam: Behavioral and subjective dose effects

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of diazepam (10–160 mg) and oxazepam (30–480 mg) were studied in volunteers with histories of drug abuse. Oral doses were administered every third day under double-blind and counterbalanced conditions. Dose-effects with area under the time-action curve data (AUC) showed diazepam to be 2.6-5.7-times more potent than oxazepam on various psychomotor, cognitive, staff-rated, and subjective measures. Comparison of relative potencies showed diazepam to be relatively more potent in producing ‘liking’ than in producing psychomotor and cognitive effects. Diazepam produced greater peak effects than oxazepam on a number of staff- and subject-rated measures, including liking. Onset of effect was more rapid and time to maximal effect was shorter (1–2 h versus 4–12 h) with diazepam than oxazepam, while time to offset of effect was similar for the two drugs. Diazepam was categorized as producing barbiturate-like subjective effects (38.3%) more frequently than was oxazepam (13.8%), while oxazepam was identified as placebo more often than diazepam. Repeated administration of 160 mg diazepam and 480 mg oxazepam showed that AUC liking was greater for diazepam than oxazepam and that tolerance to psychomotor and cognitive effects occurred with oxazepam but not diazepam. This study suggests that diazepam may have a higher abuse liability than oxazepam.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayd FJ (1975) Oxazepam: An overview. Dis Nerv Sys 36:14–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey HR, Davies E, Morrison IJ (1981) Oxazepam in the treatment of anxiety associated with depression: Results of treatment in 1600 cases (studies in depression VI). Curr Med Res Opin 7:156–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliding A (1974) Effects of different rates of absorption of two benzodiazepines on subjective and objective parameters. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 7:201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliding A (1978) The abuse potential of benzodiazepines with special reference to oxazepam. Acta Psychiatr Scand (Suppl) 274:111–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole JO, Orzack MH, Beake B, Bird M Bar-Tal Y (1982) Assessment of the abuse liability of buspirone in recreational sedative users. J Clin Psychiatry 43:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabre LF, Harris RT (1975) Clinical considerations in the abuse of antianziety and antidepressant drugs. In: Kagan F, Harwood T, Rickels K, Rudzik AD, Sorer H (eds) Hypnotics: Methods of development and evaluation. Spectrum, New York 283–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney JD (1964) Statistical method in biological assay. Hafner. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouks L, Pinalie B, Porcheron JB, Cardon A (1978) The clinical activity of oxazepam. Acta Psychiatr Scand (Suppl) 274:99–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt DJ (1981) Clinical pharmacokinetics of oxazepam and lorazepam. Clin Pharmacokinet 6:89–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt DJ, Shader RI, Abernethy DR, Ochs HR, Divoll M, Sellers EM (1982) Benzodiazepines and the challenge of pharmacokinetic toxonomy. In: Usdin E, Skolnick P, Tallman JF, Greenblatt D, Paul SM (eds) Pharmacology of benzodiazepines. Macmillan, London, 257–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Bigelow G, Liebson I (1979) Human drug self-administration: Double-blind comparison of pentobarbital, diazepam, chlorpromazine and placebo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 210:301–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, RR, Bigelow GE, Liebson I (1983) Differential effects of diazepam and pentobarbital on mood and behavior Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:865–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Liebson I, Kaliszak JE (1980) Drug preference in humans: Double-blind choice comparison of pentobarbital, diazepam and placebo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 215:649–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, McLeod DR, Bigelow GB, Liebson IA, Roache JD, Nowowleski P (1984) Comparison of diazepam and oxazepam: Preference, liking and extent of abose. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 229:501–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey SC (1980) Hypnotics and sedatives. In: Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Gilman A (eds) The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. Macmillan, New York, pp 339–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey ML, Pickens RW (1983) Diazepam dose preference in humans. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:449–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollister LE (1981) Dependence on benzodiazepines. In: Szara SI, Ludford JP (eds) Benzodiazepines: A review of research results, 1980. Natl Inst Drug Abuse Res Monogr 33: 70–83

  • Jasinski DR, Haertzen, CA, Henningfield JE, Johnson, RE, Makhzoumi HM, Miyasata K (1982) Progress report of the NIDA Addiction Research Center. Natl Inst Drug Abuse Res Monogr 41:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul B, Davidow B (1981) Drug abuse patterns of patients on methadone treatment in New York City. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 8:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR, Sloan JW, Sapira JD, Jasinski DR (1971) Physiologic, subjective and behavioral effects of amphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 12:245–258

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod DR, Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Yingling J (1982) An automated version of the digit-symbol substitution test (DSST). Behav Res Methods Instrum 14:463–466

    Google Scholar 

  • McNicholas LF, Martin WR, Cherian S (1983) Physical dependence on diazepam and lorazepam in the dog. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 226:783–789

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohler H, Sieghart W, Polc P, Bonetti EP, Hunkeler W (1982) Differential interaction of agonists and antagonists with benzodiazepine receptors. In: Usdin E, Skolnick P, Tallman JF, Greenblatt D, Paul SM (eds) Pharmacology of benzodiazepines. Macmillan, London, pp 63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecknold JC, McClure DJ, Fleuri D, Chang H (1982) Benzodiazepine withdrawal effects. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 6:517–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzman C, Shader RI, Greenblatt DJ Harmatz JS (1983) Long versus short half-life benzodiazepines in the elderly: Kinetics and clinical effects of diazepam and oxazepam. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:293–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöpf J (1983) Withdrawal phenomena after long-term administration of benzodiazepines: A review of recent investigations. Pharmacopsychiatria 16:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster CR, Fischman MW, Johanson CE (1981) Internal stimulus control and subjective effects of drugs. In: Thompson, T, Johanson CE (eds) Behavioral pharmacology of human drug dependence. Natl Inst Drug Abuse Monogr 37:116–129

  • Stitzer ML, Griffiths RR, McLellan AT, Grabowski J, Hawthone, JW (1981) Diazepam use among methadone maintenance patients: Patterns and dosages. Drug Alcohol Depend 8:189–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrer P, Rutherford D, Huggett T (1981) Benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms and propranolol. Lancet 1:520–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Usdin E, Skolnick P, Tallman JF, Greenblatt D, Paul SM (1982) Pharmacology of benzodiazepines. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters L, Nel P (1981) Die athanklikheidspotensiaal van die bensodiasepiene. S Afr Med J 59:115–116

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffiths, R.R., McLeod, D.R., Bigelow, G.E. et al. Relative abuse liability of diazepam and oxazepam: Behavioral and subjective dose effects. Psychopharmacology 84, 147–154 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427437

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427437

Key words

Navigation