Abstract
A repeated measures procedure, variable intertrial interval (ITI) spatial alternation, was used to assess scopolamine effects on memory, and to compare effects of the drug on discrimination processes with effects on storage. Rats learned in two stages to press left and right levers in alternation on discrete trials separated by 5 different ITI's ranging from 2.5 to 40 s and presented in random order during the experimental session. In the first stage, alternating discrimination, alternation was controlled by a light on over the correct lever at the time of the trial; in the second stage, variable ITI spatial alternation, a centrally located panel light signalled all trials and alternation was controlled by stimuli from prior trials (‘memory’). Alternation response occurrence declined moderately (but significantly) with increasing ITI duration in both the alternating discrimination and variable ITI spatial alternation stages; response occurrence was also significantly decreased by scopolamine treatment in both stages. Accuracy of alternating discrimination performance was not significantly altered by either ITI duration or scopolamine treatment. Accuracy of variable ITI spatial alternation performance on a trial varied inversely with the duration of the ITI that preceded the trial. Scopolamine treatment significantly reduced accuracy of lever pressing in variable ITI spatial alternation but did not alter the slope of the curves relating accuracy to ITI duration. These effects indicate that the drug impaired discrimination processes but did not alter memory storage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D'Amato, M. R.: Delayed matching and short-term memory in monkeys. In: The psychology of learning and motivation. Advances in research and theory. G. H. Bower, ed., vol. 7, pp. 227–269. New York: Academic Press 1973
Dawson, R. G., McGaugh, J. L.: Drug facilitation of learning and memory. In: The physiological basis of memory, J. A. Deutsch, ed., pp. 77–111. New York: Academic Press 1973
Dilts, S. L., Berry, C. A.: Effects of cholinergic drugs on passive avoidance in the mouse. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 158, 279–285 (1967)
Glick, S. D., Jarvik, M. E.: Differential effects of amphetamine and scopolamine on matching performance of monkeys with lateral frontal lesions. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 73, 307–313 (1970)
Glick, S. D., Zimmerberg, B.: Amnesic effects of scopolamine. Behav. Biol. 7, 245–254 (1972)
Gross, C. G., Black, P., Chorover, S.: Hippocampal lesions: Effects on memory in rats. Psychon. Sci. 12, 165–166 (1968)
Heise, G. A.: Diserete trial analysis of drug action. Fed. Proc. 34, 1898–1903 (1975)
Heise, G. A., Hrabrich, B., Lilie, N. L., Martin, R. A.: Scopolamine effects on delayed spatial alternation in the rat. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 3, 993–1002 (1975)
Krank, M., Christoph, G., Leinwand, S.: Proactive influences on spatial alternation performance in the rat. Presented to Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago 1974
Ksir, C. J., Jr.: Scopolamine and amphetamine effects on discrimination: Interaction with stimulus control. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 43, 37–41 (1975)
Martin, R. A., Conner, R. J.: Computer control for operant laboratories. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. 7, 151–156 (1975)
Masterdon, B., Skeen, L. C.: Origins of anthropoid intelligence: Prefrontal system and delayed alternation in hedgehog, tree shrew, and bush baby. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 81, 423–433 (1972)
Morrison, D. F.: Multivariate statistical methods. New York: McGraw-Hill (1967)
Petrinovich, L., Bolles, R.: Delayed alternation: Evidence for symbolic processes in the rat. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 50, 363–365 (1957)
Roberts, W. A.: Spatial separation and visual differentiation of cues as factors influencing short-term memory in the rat. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 78, 284–291 (1972)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heise, G.A., Conner, R. & Martin, R.A. Effects of scopolamine on variable intertrial interval spatial alternation and memory in the rat. Psychopharmacology 49, 131–137 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427281
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427281