Summary
Conventional recording techniques of bioelectric signals using surface electrodes are often very sensitive to artefacts, in particular when carrying out physiological investigations in ergonomics and sports.
An “active” electrode, by means of impedance-converting-amplification, was developed to signals. The application of these electrodes on the skin surface does not differ from that of conventional electrodes. The circuit elements of the impedance-converting-preamplifier, including a power-supply, are placed in a small portable housing. A qualitative comparison between conventional Ag/AgCl electrodes and “active” electrodes in ECG and EMG recordings with artefact simulation shows a high degree of artefact suppression for the “active” electrodes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basmajian JV (1979) Muscles alive. The Williams & Wilkins Company, Baltimore
Finley FR, Wirta RW, Cody KA (1968) Muscle synergies in motor performance. Arch Phys Med Rehab 49: 655–660
Rau G (1973a) Der Einflu\ der Elektroden- und Hautimpedanz bei Messungen mit OberflÄchenelektroden (EMG). Biomed Technik 18: 23–27
Rau G (1973b) Ein verbessertes Me\system zur quantitativen OberflÄchenmyographie, Anthropotechnische Mitteilung Nr. 2, Forschungsinstitut für Anthropotechnik, Meckenheim
Theysohn H, Schumacher J (1984) Verbesserung der Artefaktunterdrückung beim OberflÄchenmyogramm durch aktive Hochpa\filter mit variabler Grenzfrequenz bei möglichst kleinem Nutzsignalverlust. Biomed Technik 29: 175–180
Tietze U, Schenk CH (1983) Halbleiter-Schaltungstechnik. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo
Zipp P (1978) Die Bemessung der Elektroden-Haut-KontaktflÄche und der VerstÄrkereingangsimpedanz bei der quantitativen OberflÄchenelektrographie (EKG) und (EMG). Biomed Technik 23: 130–140
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hagemann, B., Luhede, G. & Luczak, H. Improved “active” electrodes for recording bioelectric signals in work physiology. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol. 54, 95–98 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426306
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426306