Skip to main content
Log in

Social perception and signal detectability theory: Group influence on discrimination and usage of scale

  • Published:
Psychologische Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The influence of social motivation on perception was operationalized as group pressure on the usage of a 4-point scale by which subjects discriminated two stimulus situations in a procedure analogous to signal detection experiments. After a pretest, only those subjects were taken who preferred the left end of the scale. During each main session three confederates influenced one selected subject by the opposite scale preference after each of his judgments had been given. The preformance level of the confederates was equalized to that of the naive subject in the pretest. Both the possibility of an ex post check and the resulting conflict generated motives leading to an increased performance in the experimental group but to a decrease in the control group (without influence). No subject resisted to influence. The theoretical relevance for social perception is discussed.

Zusammenfassung

Der Einfluß sozialer Motivation auf die Wahrnehmung wurde als Gruppendruck auf den Gebrauch einer 4-Punkte-Skala operationalisiert, auf der Versuchspersonen (Vpn) zwei Reizsituationen wie in Signal-Detection-Experimenten unterschieden. Nach einem Vorversuch wurden nur solche Personen genommen, die das linke Ende der Skala bevorzugten. In allen Hauptversuchen beeinflußten 3 Mitwisser des Versuchsleiters eine ausgewählte Vp durch eine gegensätzliche Bevorzugung der Skala nach jeder Antwort der Vp. Das Leistungsniveau der Mitwisser entsprach dem Niveau der naiven Vp im Vorversuch. Die Möglichkeit der nachträglichen Überprüfung und der resultierende Konflikt erzeugten Motive, die zu einer erhöhten Leistung in der experimentellen Gruppe, in der Kontrollgruppe (ohne Einfluß) jedoch zu einer Abnahme führten. Keine Vp widerstand dem Einfluß. Die theoretische Bedeutung für die soziale Wahrnehmung wird diskutiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht, H.: Elektronische Programmsteuerung und Registrierung. Fa. Heinz Albrecht, 8 München 19, Montenstraße 9.

  • Allport, F. H.: Theories of perception and the concept of structure. New York: Wiley 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E.: Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In: H. Guetzkow (ed.), Group, leadership, and men. New York: Russell and Russell 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. C.: A variable sensitivity theory of signal detection. Psychol. Rev. 70, 91–106 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernbach, H. A.: Decision processes in memory. Psychol. Rev. 74, 462–480 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S.: The motivation of behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S., Goodman, C. C.: Value and need as organizing factors in perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 42, 33–44 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, J. P., Schulman, A. I., Greenberg, G. Z.: Operating characteristics determined by binary decisions and by ratings. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 31, 768–773 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. M., Swets, J. A.: Signal detection and psychophysics. New York: Wiley 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchins, A. S., Luchins, E. H.: Previous experience with ambiguous and non-ambiguous perceptual stimuli under various social influences. J. soc. Psychol. 42, 249–270 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey-Dickinson Company Inc.: MD General equipment catalog 100. 9-11 Elen Street, Saxonville, Mass. 01701, USA.

  • Postman, L., Bruner, J. S., McGinnies, E.: Personal values as selective factors in perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 43, 142–154 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweets, J. A.: Signal detection and recognition by human observers. New York: Wiley 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Sewall, S. T.: Invariance of signal detectability over stages of practice and level of motivation. J. exp. Psychol. 66, 120–126 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweets, J. A., Tanner, W. P., Birdsall, T. G.: Decision processes in perception. Psychol. Rev. 68, 301–340 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H.: Value and the perceptual judgment of magnitude. Psychol. Rev. 64, 192–204 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Social and cultural factors in perception. In: G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.)/ Handbook of social psychology, vol. III. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Cawasjee, S. D.: Value and the accentuation of judged differences: a confirmation. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 59, 436–439 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittreich, W. J.: The Honi phenomenon: a case of selective perceptual distortion. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 47, 705–712 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Radcliffe, K. B.: Differences in the perception of an authority figure and a non-authority figure by navy recruits. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 53, 383–384 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Upmeyer, A. Social perception and signal detectability theory: Group influence on discrimination and usage of scale. Psychol. Forsch. 34, 283–294 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00424728

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00424728

Keywords

Navigation