Skip to main content
Log in

A linguistic decision process in group decision making

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assuming a set of linguistic preferences representing the preferences of the individuals, a linguistic choice process is presented. This is developed using the concept of fuzzy majority for deriving a collective linguistic preference, and the concept of nondominated alternatives for deriving the selected alternatives in the linguistic choice process. The fuzzy majorities are equated with fuzzy linguistic quantifiers. The collective linguistic preference is derived by means of a linguistic ordered weighted averaging operator whose weights are defined using a fuzzy linguistic quantifier. In order to obtain the nondominated alternatives, we present a novel reformulation of Orlovski's nondominance degree under linguistic information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonissone, P.P., and K.S. Decker. (1986). “Selecting Uncertainty Calculi and Granularity: An Experiment in Trading-Off Precision and Complexity.“ In L.H. Kanal and J.F. Lemmer (eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, T.X. (1987). Co-oP: A Group Decision Support System for Cooperative Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M., J.L. Verdegay, and M.A. Vila. (1993a). “Linguistic Decision Making Models,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems 7, 479–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M., J.L. Verdegay, and M.A. Vila. (1993b). “On Aggregation Operations of Linguistic Labels,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems 8, 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedrizzi, M., and L. Mich. (1992). “Rule Based Model for Consensus Reaching Group Decisions Support.” In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in KBS (IPMU), Spain.

  • Herrera, F., and J.L. Verdegay. (1993). “Linguistic Assessments in Group Decision.” In Proceedings of the First European Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Technologies, Aachen.

  • Kacprzyk, J. (1986). “Group Decision Making with a Fuzzy Linguistic Majority,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 18, 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk, J. (1990). Multiperson Decision Making Models Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk, J., and M. Roubens. (1988). Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk, J., M. Fedrizzi, and H. Nurmi. (1990). “Group Decision Making with Fuzzy Majorities Represented by Linguistic Quantifiers.” In J.L. Verdegay and M. Delgado (eds.), Approximate Reasoning Tools for Artificial Intelligence. Cologne: Verlag TÜV Rheinland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk, J., M. Fedrizzi, and H. Nurmi. (1992). “Fuzzy Logic with Linguistic Quantifiers in Group Decision Making.” In R.R. Yager and L.A. Zadeh (eds.), An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic Applications in Intelligent Systems. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mich, L., L. Gaio, M. Fedrizzi. (1993). “On Fuzzy Logic-Based Consensus in Group Decision.” In Proceedings of the Fifth IFSA World Congress, Seoul.

  • Nurmi, H., and Kacprzyk, J. (1991). “On Fuzzy Tournaments and Their Solution Concepts in Group Decision Making,” European Journal of Operational Research 51, 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlovski, S.A. (1978). “Decision-Making with a Fuzzy Preference Relation,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillman, R., and B. Spillman. (1987). “A Survey of Some Contributions of Fuzzy Sets to Decision Theory.” In J.C. Bezdek (ed.), Analysis of Fuzzy Information. New York: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.R. (1988). “On Ordered Weighted Averaging Aggregation Operators in Multicriteria Decision Making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18, 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.R. (1992a). “Fuzzy Screening Systems.” In R. Lowen (ed.), Fuzzy Logic: State of the Art. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.R. (1992b). “Applications and Extensions of OWA Operator,” International Journal of Man-Machines Studies 37, 103–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. (1975). “The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Applications to Approximate Reasoning, Part I,” Information Sciences 8, 199–249. “Part II,” Information Sciences 8, 301–357. “Part III,” Information Sciences 9, 43–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. (1979). “Fuzzy Sets and Information Granularity.” M.M. Gupta et al. (eds.), Advances in Fuzzy Sets Theory and Applications. New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. (1983). “A Computational Approach to Fuzzy Quantifiers in Natural,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications 9, 149–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E. & Verdegay, J.L. A linguistic decision process in group decision making. Group Decis Negot 5, 165–176 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419908

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419908

Key Words

Navigation