Abstract
Brain-damaged patients with unilateral spatial neglect ignore aspects of the world located on the side opposite their lesion. In the present study we examined the performance of unilateral neglect patients (UN) on an SRT task in which a hybrid repeating sequence (21313) was used. We analyzed the patients' performance for each location separately as a function of the target's location in the trial preceding the response. The UN patients were severely limited in their learning of the sequence when compared to normal controls. In particular, they appeared to learn unique associations (21 and 13) but not ambiguous ones (31 and 32). We discuss two possible explanations for this phenomenon. The first is that UN patients show a deficit similar to that of normal subjects in dual task situations. The second is that the learning deficit is unique to spatial processing impairments of UN patients and is not directly related to research with normal population. We outline future research that may distinguish between these two explanations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bender, M. B. (1952). Disorders in perception. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
Berti, A., Allport A., Driver, J., Dieners, Z., Oxbury, J., & Oxbury, S. (1992). Levels of processing for visual stimuli in an “extinguished” field. Neuropsychologia, 30, 403–415.
Bisiach, E., & Luzzatti, C. (1978). Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex, 14, 129–133.
Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., & Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 17–30.
Cohen, A., Ivry, R. B., Rafal, R. D., & Kohn, C. (1995). Activating response codes by stimuli in the neglected visual field. Neuropsychology, 2, 165–173.
Curran, T. (1995). On the neural mechanisms of sequence learning. Psyche, 2(12), URL: http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/volume21/psyche-95-2-12-sequence-1-curran.html
Curran, T. (this volume). Effects of aging on implicit sequence learning: Accounting for sequence structure and explicit knowledge. Psychological Research.
Curran, T., & Keele, S. W. (1993) Attentional and non-attentional forms of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology.. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 189–202.
Duncan, J. (1980). The demonstration of capacity limitation. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 75–96.
Frensch, P. A., & Miner, C. S. (1994). Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Memory and Cognition. 22, 95–110.
Frensch, P. A., Buchner, A., & Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transactions in the presence and absence of a distractor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 567–584.
Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1993). The history and clinical presentation of neglect. In I. H. Robertson and J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies (pp. 3–25). Hove, U.K.: LEA.
Heilman, K. M., Watson, R. T., & Valenstein, E. (1993). Neglect and related disorders. In K. M. Heilman and E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical Nuropsychology (pp. 279–336). New York: Oxford University Press.
Keele, S. W., Cohen, A. & Ivry, R. I. (1990) Motor programs: Concepts and issues. M. H. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII (pp. 3–18). New York: Evlbaum.
Keele, S. W., & Curran, T. (in press). On the modularity of sequence learning systems in humans. In E. Covey (Ed.), Neural representation of temporal patterns. New York: Plenum.
Keele, S. W., & Jennings, P. J. (1992). Attention in the representation of sequence: Experiment and theory. Human Movement Studies, 11, 125–138.
Keele, S. W., Jennings, P. J., Jones, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representations. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 17–30.
Kinsbourne, M. (1993). Orientational bias model of unilateral neglect: Evidence from attentional gradients within hemispace. In I. H. Robertson and J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies (pp. 63–86). Hove, U.K.: LEA.
Marshall, J. C., Halligan, P. W., & Robertson, I. H. (1993). Contemporary theories of unilateral neglect: A critical review. In I. H. Robertson, J. C. Marshall (Eds) Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies (pp. 311–329). Hove, U.K.: LEA.
Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 350–365.
Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science. 240, 1627–1631.
Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal lobe injury on covert orienting of visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863–1874.
Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 585–594.
Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1983). The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 21, 589–599.
Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Perceptual and action systems in unilateral visual neglect. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect (pp. 151–181). Holland: Elsevier.
Rizzolatti, G., & Berti, A. (1993). Neural mechanisms of spatial neglect. In I. H. Robertson and J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies (pp. 87–105). Hove, U.K.: LEA.
Robertson, I. H. (1993). The relationship between lateralized and non-lateralized attentional deficits in unilateral neglect. In I. H. Robertson and J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies (pp. 257–278). Hove, U.K.: LEA.
Schmidtke, V., & Heuer, H. (this volume). Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research.
Soroker, N., Calamaro, N., & Myslobodsky, S. (1995). McGurk illusions to bilateral administration of sensory stimuli in patients with hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia, 33, 461–470.
Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195–231.
Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 21, 674–685.
Vallar, G. (1993). The anatomical basis of spatial hemineglect in humans. In I. H. Robertson and J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies (pp. 27–59). Hove, U.K.: LEA.
Werth, R. (1993). Shifts and omissions in spatial reference in unilateral neglect. In I. H. Robertson and J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies (pp. 211–231). Hove, U.K.: LEA.
Wilson, B., Cockburn, J., & Halligan, P. (1987). Development of a behavioral test of visual-spatial neglect. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab., 68, 98–102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, A., Wasserman, A. & Soroker, N. Learning spatial sequences in unilateral neglect. Psychol. Res 60, 42–52 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419679
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419679