Skip to main content
Log in

Competition between an Escherichia coli tyrosine auxotroph and a prototrophic revertant in glucose- and tyrosine-limited chemostats

  • Physiology and Growth
  • Published:
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A tyrosine-requiring strain of Escherichia coli was grown in tyrosine-limited chemostats at a range of dilution rates between 0.08 h-1 and 0.42 h-1, conditions which always resulted in the selection of a prototrophic revertant population able to synthesise tyrosine. Analysis of the two-membered mixed cultures which arose showed that the prototrophic population outgrew the auxotroph since its growth rate was not restricted by the growth-limiting concentrations of exogenous tyrosine. During the take-over of the culture, the prototroph population grew exponentially but the specific growth rate increased with decreasing dilution rate of the competition experiments. In glucose-limited chemostats (in the presence of non-growth-limiting concentrations of tyrosine) of the tyrosine-requiring strain, prototrophs were never detected. Constructed two-membered mixed cultures with both populations competing for limiting amounts of glucose, showed that the prototroph was less competitive than the auxotroph.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cox, E. C. and Gibson, T. C. 1974. Selection for high mutation rates in chemostats. — Genetics 77: 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, T. C. Scheppe, M. L. and Cox, E. C. 1970. Fitness of an Escherichia coli mutator gene. —Science 169: 686–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, D. and Slater, J. H. 1979. The influence of the growth environment on the stability of a drug resistant plasmid in Escherichia coli K12. — J. Gen. Microbiol. 111: 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder, W. and Veldkamp, H. 1971. Competition of marine psychrophilic bacteria at low temperature. — Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 37: 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, B. S., Burleigh, B. D., Midwinter, G. C., Moore, C. H., Morris, H. R., Rigby, P. W. J., Smith, M. J. and Taylor, S. S. 1972. p. 151–176. In J. Drenta, R. A. Oosterbaan and C. Velgar (eds), Enzymes: Structure and function. — North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jannasch, H. W.. 1967. Enrichment of aquatic bacteria in continuous culture. — Arch. Mikrobiol. 59: 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jannasch, H. W.. 1968. Competitive elimination of Enterobacteriaceae from sea water. — Appl. Microbiol. 16: 1616–1618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jannasch, H. W. 1969. Estimation of bacterial growth rates in natural waters. — J. Bacteriol. 99: 156–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilin, D. and Hartree, E. F. 1948. The properties of glucose oxidase. — Biochem. J. 42: 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenen, J. G., Boonstra, J., Schroder, H. G. J. and Veldkamp, H. 1977. Competition for inorganic substrates among chemoorganotrophic and chemolithotrophic bacteria. — Microb. Ecol. 3: 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matin, A. and Veldkamp, H. 1978. Physiological basis of the selective advantage of a Spirillum sp. in a carbon-limited environment. — J. Gen. Microbiol. 105: 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, H. 1958. The dynamics of bacterial populations maintained in a chemostat. — Publication 614 Carnegie Institute Washington, Washington DC.

  • Powell, E. O. 1958. Criteria for the growth of contaminants and mutants in continuous culture. — J. Gen. Microbiol. 18: 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udenfriend, S. and Cooper, J. R. 1952. The chemical estimation of tyrosine and tyramine. — J. Biol. Chem. 22: 104–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamenhoff, S. and Eichhorn, H. H. 1967. Study of microbial evolution through loss of biosynthetic functions: establishment of defective mutants. — Nature, London 216: 456–458.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by a grant from the Science Research Council.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mason, T.G., Slater, J.H. Competition between an Escherichia coli tyrosine auxotroph and a prototrophic revertant in glucose- and tyrosine-limited chemostats. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 45, 253–263 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00418588

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00418588

Keywords

Navigation